Skip to main content
Log in

Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationships between foreign ownership, managers' independence in decision-making and exporting of foreign-invested firms in five European Union accession countries. Using a unique, hand-collected data set of 434 foreign-invested firms in Poland, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and Estonia, we show that foreign investors' ownership and control over strategic decisions are positively associated with export intensity, measured as the proportion of exports to total sales. The study also analyzes specific governance and control configurations in foreign-invested firms, showing that foreign equity and foreign control over business functions are complementary in terms of their effects on export intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the following OECD classification according to NACE two- and three-digit codes: high-tech 242, 244, 30, 32, 333, 3530; medium-high-tech: 24 excl. 242, 29, 34, 352, 354, 359; medium-low-tech: 23, 25–28, 351; low-tech: 15–22, 36–37.

  2. The ANOVA test statistics show that there are significant differences between clusters and similarities within clusters with respect to all variables.

References

  • Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (3): 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, O. 1993. On the internationalization process of firms: A critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (2): 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. 1994. The Japanese firm as a system of attributes. In M. Aoki & R. Dore (Eds), The Japanese firm: Sources of competitive strength: 11–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aulakh, P., Masaaki, K., & Teegen, H. 2000. Export strategies and performance of firms from emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile and Mexico. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 342–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15 (1): 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, A., Estrin, S., & Meyer, K. 2004. Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review, 13 (1): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. 1996. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (3): 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. 1997. How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (3): 467–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capabilities and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Morrison, A. J. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (4): 729–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., & Demina, N. 2000. Exporting activity in transitional economies: An enterprise-level study. Journal of Development Studies, 37 (2): 44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, T., Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., & Demina, N. 2003. Insider ownership, human resource strategies and performance in a transition economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 34 (6): 530–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., & Fredrickson, J. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (3): 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. 1998. Politicians and firms in seven Central and Eastern European countries. World Bank Technical Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2): 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichtl, E., Koeglmayr, H.-G., & Mueller, S. 1990. International orientation as a precondition for export success. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, L. V., & Sequeira, C. G. 1993. Determinants of LDC exporters’ performance: A cross-national study. Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (1): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. 2006. Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (7): 637–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Wright, M. 1999. Corporate governance in the former Soviet Union: An overview. Journal of Comparative Economics, 27 (3): 398–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., Wright, M., & Buck, T. 1996. Corporate restructuring in Russian privatizations: Implications for US investors. California Management Review, 38 (2): 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Zhukov, V. 2000. Downsizing in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Demina, N., Wright, M., & Buck, T. 2001a. Strategic choices, export orientation and corporate governance in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (4): 853–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Demina, N., & Kapelyushnikov, R. 2001b. The effects of ownership concentration on investment and performance in privatized firms in Russia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22 (6): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Lien, Y.-C., & Piesse, J. 2007. FDI by firms from newly industrialized economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4): 556–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, M., & Williams, K. 2006. Global, national and local practices of multinational corporations: Towards a sociopolitical framework. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (1): 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 1993. Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (6): 401–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J. 2002. The principal's other problems: Honest incompetence and the specification of objectives. Academy of Management Review, 27 (1): 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F., & Park, Y. R. 1993. Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39 (9): 1054–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (5): 1084–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: effects of innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C.-M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. 2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (4): 697–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1980. Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52 (3): 1131–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54 (3): 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1–2): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, L. C., & Katsikeas, C. S. 1996. The export development process: An integrative review of empirical models. Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (3): 517–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, Y.-C., Piesse, J., Strange, R., & Filatotchev, I. 2005. The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions: Evidence from Taiwan. International Business Review, 14 (6): 739–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Peng, M. 1999. Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30 (2): 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, I. 2003. Privatisation in Hungary and its aftermath. In D. Parker & D. Saal (Eds), International handbook on privatisation: 427–453. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhija, M. V. 2004. The value of restructuring in emerging economies: The case of the Czech Republic. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (3): 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., & Oviatt, B. M. 1996. New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: A follow-up study. Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (1): 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E. 2002. Management challenges in privatization acquisitions in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 37 (4): 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Estrin, S. 2001. Brownfield entry in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickiewicz, T., & Baltowski, M. 2003. All roads lead to outside ownership: Polish piecemeal privatisation. In D. Parker & D. Saal (Eds), International handbook on privatisation: 402–426. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. 1994. Complementarities and systems: Understanding Japanese economic organization. Estudios Economicos, 9 (1): 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. 1995. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19 (2–3): 179–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. 1999. MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence. International Business Review, 8 (2): 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. 2000. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3): 602–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. 2000. Business strategies in transition economies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. 2004. Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (5): 453–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M., & Ilinitch, A. 1998. Export intermediary firms: A note on export development research. Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (3): 609–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, G., Anderson, R. E., Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. 1997. Privatization and restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Technical Paper #368, World Bank, Washington, DC.

  • Rediker, K. J., & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (2): 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4): 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G., & Carpenter, M. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (2): 158–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. 1982. Summated rating scale constructions: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, J. 2004. Firm-specific determinants of productivity gaps between East and West German industrial branches. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, 7 (2): 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas III, L. G., & Waring, G. 1999. Competing capitalisms: Capital investment in American, German and Japanese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (8): 729–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Organizational transformation in transition economies: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (2): 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15 (3): 421–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, L., & Luostarinen, R. 1988. Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14 (2): 36–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Tavares, A. T. 2004. Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review, 13 (2): 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, R. J., & Pound, J. 1990. Are large shareholders effective monitors? An investigation of share ownership and corporate performance. In R. G. Hubbard (Ed.), Asymmetric information, corporate finance and investment: 149–180. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an EU research grant ‘EU Integration and the Prospects for Catch-Up Development in CEECs – The Determinants of the Productivity Gap’ (contract no. HPSE-CT-2001-00065). We thank Keith Brouthers, Saul Estrin, Klaus Meyer, Mike Wright, the participants of the 2006 Academy of Management Annual Meeting (Atlanta, USA), David K. Tse (the Departmental Editor) and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Filatotchev.

Additional information

Accepted by Arie Y Lewin, Editor-in-Chief, 23 August 2007. This paper has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filatotchev, I., Stephan, J. & Jindra, B. Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies. J Int Bus Stud 39, 1133–1148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400404

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400404

Keywords

Navigation