Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational innovation in the multinational enterprise: Internalization theory and business history

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article engages in a methodological experiment by using historical evidence to challenge a common misperception about internalization theory. The theory has often been criticized for maintaining that it assumes a hierarchically organized MNE based on knowledge flowing from the home country. This is not an accurate description of how global firms operate in recent decades, but this article shows it has never been true historically. Using longitudinal data on individual firms from the nineteenth century onwards, it reveals evidence of how entrepreneurs and firms with multinational activity faced with market imperfections changed the design of their headquarters and their organizational structures.

Resume

Cet article se présente comme une expérience méthodologique en utilisant des preuves historiques pour contester une perception erronée commune sur la théorie d’internalisation. La théorie a souvent été critiquée pour avoir soutenu qu’elle faisait l’hypothèse d’une entreprise multinationale (EMN) organisée hiérarchiquement et fondée sur des connaissances qui proviennent du pays d’origine. Ce n’est pas une description exacte de la façon dont les entreprises mondiales ont fonctionné au cours des dernières décennies; cet article montre que cela n’a jamais été vrai historiquement. Utilisant des données longitudinales sur des entreprises individuelles à partir du XIXe siècle, il révèle la façon dont les entrepreneurs et les entreprises ayant une activité multinationale faisant face aux imperfections du marché ont changé la conception de leur siège social et de leurs structures organisationnelles.

Resumen

Este artículo se dedica a un experimento metodológico usando evidencia histórica para retar una percepción errónea común sobre la teoría de la internalización. La teoría con frecuencia ha sido criticada por mantener que esta asume que una empresa multinacional organizada jerárquicamente basada en el conocimiento que fluye desde el país de origen. Esta no es una descripción precisa de cómo operan las empresas globales en las últimas décadas, pero este artículo muestra que nunca ha sido cierto históricamente. Utilizando datos longitudinales de empresas individuales desde el siglo XIX en adelante, pone en evidencia cómo los empresarios y las empresas con actividad multinacional que se enfrentaron a imperfecciones del mercado cambiaron el diseño de sus casas matrices y sus estructuras organizacionales.

Resumo

Este artigo se apoia em um experimento metodológico usando evidência histórica para desafiar um equívoco comum sobre a teoria da internalização. A teoria tem sido frequentemente criticada por sustentar que pressupõe uma MNE hierarquicamente organizada baseada no conhecimento proveniente do país de origem. Esta não é uma descrição precisa de como empresas globais operam nas últimas décadas, mas este artigo mostra que nunca foi verdade historicamente. Usando dados longitudinais de empresas individuais a partir do século XIX, este artigo revela evidência de como empreendedores e empresas com atividade multinacional, caracterizada por imperfeições de mercado, mudaram o design de suas sedes empesariais e suas estruturas organizacionais.

抽象

本文进行方法论实验, 用历史证据来挑战有关内化理论的常见误解。该理论经常受批评, 因为它假设一个基于来自本国知识流的分级组织的跨国企业。这不是对近几十年来全球公司如何运作情况的准确描述, 但本文表明, 从历史上看它也从来不是真实的。使用十九世纪以来各公司的纵向数据, 本文揭示了企业家和具有跨国活动的公司如何面对市场的不完善而改变其总部及组织结构设计的证据。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Source: Authors

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. N. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aharoni, Y. 1966. The foreign investment decision process. Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aharoni, Y., Tihanyi, L., & Connelly, B. L. 2011. Managerial decision-making in international business: A forty-five-year retrospective. Journal of World Business, 46: 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Holm, U. 2010. Managing the contemporary multinational: The role of headquarters. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G., Dávila, C., & Jones, G. 2017. The alternative business history: Business in emerging markets. Business History Review, 91(3): 537–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, M. I. 2015. Business groups in nineteenth and twentieth century Argentina. In G. Jones & A. Lluch (Eds), The impact of globalization on Argentina and Chile: Business enterprises and entrepreneurship: 6–44. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, M. I., & Lluch, A. 2015. El capitalismo familiar en Argentina: Modelos y dinámicas a largo plazo. In P. Fernández Pérez & A. Lluch (Eds), Familias iempresariales y grandes empresas familiars: 219–246. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, E. 2003. Approaches to technology transfer in history and the case of nineteenth century Mexico. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 1(2): 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, E. 2009. Bottles of beer: The business of technological innovation in Mexico, 1890–1920. Business History Review, 83(2): 317–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S. 1998. The German metal traders before 1914. In G. Jones (Ed), The multinational traders: 66–85. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T., & Swedberg, R. (Eds). 2011. The entrepreneur: Classic texts by Joseph Schumpeter. Stanford: Standford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedingfield, R. E. 1963. Personality: New vista for platinum king, New York Times, November 3.

  • Benito, G. R., Petersen, B., & Welch, L. S. 2009. Towards more realistic conceptualisations of foreign operation modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1455–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Braunerhjelm, P., Holm, U., & Terjesen, S. 2006. Why do some multinational corporations relocate their headquarters overseas? Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 681–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc, H., & Sierra, C. 1999. The internationalisation of R&D by multinationals: A trade-off between external and internal proximity. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2): 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. 1983. Foreign direct divestment theory: Is it the reverse of FDI theory? Review of World Economics, 119(2): 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. L. 1994. International-business political behaviour: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19(1): 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, F., & Jones, G. 1994. Foreign multinationals in British manufacturing, 1850–1962. Business History, 36(1): 89–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. A. 2000. Chinese big business and the wealth of nations. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. (Ed). 2009. Business history and international business. Business History Special Issue, 51(3).

  • Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 2009a. The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1563–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., & Casson, M. 2009b. The internalisation theory of the multinational enterprise: A review of the progress of a research agenda after 30 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1563–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. 2017. Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9): 1045–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cage, R. A. (Ed). 1985. The Scots abroad: Labour, capital, enterprise, 1750–1914. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlos, A. M., & Nicholas, S. 1988. Giants of an earlier capitalism: The chartered trading companies as modern multinationals. Business History Review, 62(3): 398–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, F. V. 1984. American enterprise in foreign markets: Singer and International Harvester in Imperial Russia. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassis, Y. (Ed). 1992. Finance and financiers in European history, 1880–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassis, Y. 2006. Capital of capitals: The rise and fall of international financial centres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassis, Y., & Minoglou, I. P. (Eds). 2005. Entrepreneurship in theory and history. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1985. Transaction costs and the theory of the multinational enterprise. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1986. General theories of the multinational enterprise: Their relevance to business history. In P. Hertner & G. Jones (Eds), Multinationals: Theory and history: 42–63. London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1987. The firm and the market: Studies in multinational enterprise and the scope of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1990. Enterprise and competitiveness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1994. Institutional diversity in international business. Business History, 36(4): 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 2003. The entrepreneur: An economic theory (2nd ed.). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., & Casson, C. (Eds). 2013. History of entrepreneurship: Innovation and risk-taking, 1200–2000. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., & Godley, A. 2005. Entrepreneurship and historical explanation. In Y. Cassis & I. P. Monoglou (Eds), Entrepreneurship in theory and history: 25–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., & Lopes, Td S. 2013. Foreign direct investment in high-risk environments: An historical perspective. Business History, 55(3): 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M., Porter, L., & Wadeson, N. 2016. Internalization theory: An unfinished agenda. International Business Review, 25(6): 1223–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. 2015. The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1977. The visible hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. 1991. The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Amatori, F., & Hikino, T. (Eds). 1997. Big business and the wealth of nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Sloan, A., & Williamson, O. 1987. The role of the centre. In M. Goold & A. Campbell (Eds), Strategies and styles: The role of the centre in managing diversified corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. 2003. Merchant enterprise in Britain: From the Industrial Revolution to World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, B., & Hatton, T. 2003. International migration and the integration of labor markets. In M. D. Bordo, A. M. Taylor, & J. G. Williamson (Eds), Globalization in historical perspective: 65–120. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coeurderoy, R., & Verbeke, A. 2016. The unbalanced geography of the world’s largest MNEs: Institutional quality and the head office distribution across countries. Global Strategy Journal, 6, 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D., Young, D., & Goold, M. 2007. The size, structure and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 383–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpan, A. M., & Jones, G. 2016. Business groups, entrepreneurship and the growth of Koç Group in Turkey. Business History, 58(1): 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, T. A. B. 1983. A history of Burmah Oil Company, 1860–1924. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, T. A. B. 1994. Britain’s overseas investments in 1914 revisited. Business History, 36(1): 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, T. A. B. 1998. The free-standing company in theory and practice. In M. Wilkins & H. G. Schröter (Eds), The free-standing company in the world economy: 1830–1996: 129–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, P. L. 1979. Industrial finance, 1830–1914. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criscuolo, P., Narula, R., & Verspagen, B. 2005. Role of home and host country innovation systems in R&D internationalisation: A patent citation analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5): 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Fernández, P Adl. 2014. Marketing the hearth: Ornamental embroidery and the building of the multinational Singer sewing machine company. Enterprise & Society, 15(3): 442–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A beharioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport-Hines, R. P. T. 1986. Glaxo as a multinational before 1963. In G. Jones (Ed), British multinationals: Origins, management and performance: 137–163. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport-Hines, R. P. T., & Slinn, J. 1992. Glaxo—A history to 1962. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, T., & Westerhuis, G. (Eds). 2014. The power of corporate networks: A comparative and historical perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B. 1969. Peacefully working to conquer the world: The Singer manufacturing company in foreign markets, 1854–1889. Business History Review, 43(3): 299–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. B. 1976. Peacefully working to conquer the world: Singer sewing machines in foreign markets, 1854–1920. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzé, P. Y. 2010. Switzerland and the industrialization of Japan: Swiss direct investment and technology transfers to Japan during the twentieth century. Business History, 52(5): 713–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donzé, P. Y., & Kurosawa, T. 2013. Nestlé coping with Japanese nationalism: Political risk and the strategy of a foreign multinational enterprise in Japan, 1913–1945. Business History, 55(8): 1318–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguid, P., & Lopes, Td S. 1999. Ambiguous company: Institutions and organization in the port wine trade, 1814–1834. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47(1): 84–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational enterprise and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. 2009. Location and the multinational enterprise: John Dunning’s thoughts on receiving the Journal of International Business Studies 2008 decade award. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1): 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & McQueen, M. 1981. The eclectic theory of international production: A case study of the international hotel industry. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2(4): 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear, J. 2008. Cartels. In G. Jones & J. Zeitlin (Eds), The Oxford handbook of business history: 268–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, R. W. 1982. The history of the British Petroleum Company. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. 1997. On the relations of corporate headquarters. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2): 313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez-Muñoz, L., & Jones, G. 2001. Foreign multinationals in the United States. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Ruiz, J., & Toninelli, P. A. 2010. The determinants of entrepreneurship: Leadership, culture, institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. The Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, A. 2001. Jewish immigrant entrepreneurship in New York and London, 1880–1914. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, A. 2006. Selling the sewing machine around the world: Singer’s international marketing strategies, 1850–1920. Enterprise and Society, 7(2): 266–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, N. 1990. Two hundred years of Port and Sherry. London: House of Sandeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlaftis, G., & Minoglou, I. P. (Eds). 2005. Diaspora entrepreneurial networks: Four centuries of history. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. 1998. The Age of mass migration: Causes and economic impact. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. 2002. What fundamentals drive world migration? National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 9159.

  • Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNE—A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, J. 1966. World events, 1866–1966—The first hundred years of Nestlé. Vevey: Nestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, J. 1991. Nestlé-125 years, 1866–1991. Vevey: Nestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. (Ed). 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Cambridge MA: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1986. Internalization in practice: Early foreign direct investments in Malaysian tin mining. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(2): 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1991. Transaction cost theory of the multinational enterprise. In C. N. Pitelis & R. Sugden (Eds), The nature of the transnational firm: 72–119. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1993. The swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of “Market” and “Hierarchy”. Organizational Science, 4(4): 529–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F. 1994. The ‘comparative institutional’ theory of the firm: Some implications for corporate strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 31(2): 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J.-F., & Reddy, S. 1997. The choice between mergers/acquisitions and joint ventures: The case of Japanese investors in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., & Kim, W. C. 1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2): 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilleman, J., & Verbeke, A. 2014. Internalization theory and the governance of the global factory. In A. Verbeke, R. Van Tulder, & S. Lundan (Eds), Multinational enterprises, markets and institutional diversity: 27–28. New York: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. 2008. Political risk, democratic institutions, and foreign direct investment. The Journal of Politics, 70(4): 1040–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 1981. The state and the emergence of the British oil industry. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 1985. The Gramophone Company: An Anglo-American multinational, 1898–1931. Business History Review, 59(1): 76–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (Ed). 1986. British multinationals: Origins, management and performance. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 1988. Foreign multinationals and British industry before 1945. Economic History Review, 41(3): 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 1993. British multinational banking, 1830–1990. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 1998. British overseas banks as free-standing companies 1830–1994. In M. Wilkins & H. G. Schröter (Eds), The free-standing company in the world economy: 1830–1996: 344–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2000. Merchants to multinationals. British trading companies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2005a. Multinationals and global capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2005b. Renewing Unilever: Transformation and tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2010. Beauty imagined. A history of the global beauty industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2013. Entrepreneurship and multinationals: Global business and the making of the modern world. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. 2014. Business history and the impact of MNEs on host economies. In J. Boddewyn (Ed), Multidisciplinary insights from new AIB fellows: 177–200. Emerald: Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Atzberger, A. 2015. Hans Wilsdorf and Rolex (p. 805–138. Boston: Harvard Business School. (rev. September 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Benton, E. R. 2016. Goldfinger: Charles W. Engelhard Jr. and Apartheid-era South Africa (p. 313–148. Boston: Harvard Business School. (rev. Nov. 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Bostock, F. 1996. US multinationals in British manufacturing before 1962. Business History Review, 70(2): 207–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Khanna, T. 2006. Bringing history (back) into international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4): 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Lluch, A. (Eds). 2015. The impact of globalization on Argentina and Chile: Business enterprises and entrepreneurship. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Lubinski, L. 2012. Managing political risk in global business: Beiersdorf, 1914–1990. Enterprise and Society, 13(1): 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., Norris, M., & Kim, S. 2016. Horst Dassler, Adidas, and the commercialization of sport (p. 316–007. Boston: Harvard Business School. (rev. June 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Pitelis, C. 2015. Entrepreneurial imagination and a demand and supply-side perspective on the MNE and cross-border organization. Journal of International Management, 21(4): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Schröter, H. G. (Eds). 1993. The rise of multinationals in continental Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G., & Wadhwani, R. D. (Eds). 2007. Entrepreneurship and global capitalism. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, J., & van Zanden, J. L. 2007. A history of Royal Dutch Shell (Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-W. 1995. J.&P. Coats in Tsarist Russia, 1889–1917. Business History Review, 69(4): 465–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-W. 1997. Coats as a multinational before 1914. Business and Economic History, 26(2): 526–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kininmonth, K. W. 2006. The growth, development and management of J. & P. Coats Ltd, c.1890–1960: An analysis of strategy and structure. Business History, 48(4): 551–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. G., & Cavusgil, S. T. 1996. The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internaitonlization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrak, C., & Hansen, P. (Eds). 2004. European business, dictatorship and political risk, 1920–1945. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrak, C., & Wüstenhagen, J. 2006. International investment and Nazi politics. The cloaking of German assets abroad: 1936–1945. Business History, 48(3): 399–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, P. H., & Zeitlin, J. 2004. Local players in global games. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunisch, S., Menz, M., & Ambos, B. 2015. Changes at corporate headquarters: Review, integration, and future research. International Journal of Management Review, 17(3): 356–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurosawa, T. 2010. Neutral Switzerland and national socialism: The Second World War and the recognition of history. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. E., Mokyr, J., & Baumol, W. J. (Eds). 2010. The invention of enterprise: Entrepreneurship from ancient Mesopotamia to modern times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesay, H. C. 2000. Andrew Carnegie and the rise of big business. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S. 1997. Internationacionalização e concentração no vinho do porto. Porto: ICEP/GEHVID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S. 2007. Global brands: The growth of multinationals in the alcoholic drinks industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S. 2010. The entrepreneur, ownership advantages, and the eclectic paradigm. Multinational Business Review, 18(2): 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S, & Casson, M. 2007. Entrepreneurship and the development of global brands. Business History Review, 81(4): 651–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S, & Casson, M. 2012. Brand protection and globalization of British business. Business History Review, 86(2): 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S, & Casson, M. 2013. Foreign direct investment in high-risk environments: An historical perspective. Business History, 55(3): 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S, Guimarães, C. G., Saes, A., & Saraiva, L. F. 2017. The ‘disguised’ foreign investor. Business History, 59(5): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, Td S, & Simões, V. C. 2017. Foreign investment in Portugal and knowledge spillovers: From the Methuen Treaty to the 21st century. Business History, 59(6): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. 1997. The internationlization of born globals: An evolutionary process. International Business Review, 6: 561–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of economics. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. 1992. American multinationals and Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, I. B., Harlaftis, G., & Minoglou, I. P. (Eds). 2005. Diaspora entrepreneurial networks: Four centuries of history. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCraw, T. K. 1995. Creating modern capitalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., & Benito, G. 2016. Where do MNEs locate their headquarters? At home! Global Strategy Journal, 6(2): 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. 1991. Foreign acquisitions: When do they make sense? Managerial Finance, 17(6): 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R., & Santangelo, G. D. 2012. Location and collocation advantages in international innovation. Multinational Business Review, 20(1): 6–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R., & Verbeke, A. 2015. Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 612–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oonk, G. 2007. Global Indian diasporas: Exploring trajectories of migration and theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1): 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, P. 1974. British entrepreneurship in the nineteenth century. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquet, C. 2004. The Suez company’s concession in Egypt, 1854–1956: Modern infrastructure and local economic development. Enterprise & Society, 5(1): 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 1998. The competitive advantage of nations. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1): 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. B. 1972. The organisation of industry. The Economic Journal, 82(327): 883–896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridings, E. 1985. Foreign predominance among overseas traders in nineteenth century Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 20(2): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. 1976. Risk reduction by international diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 7(2): 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. 1981. A test of internalization theory. Managerial and Decision Eocnomics, 2(4): 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M. 2005. The regional multinationals: MNEs and ‘global’ strategic management. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2003. Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic management perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2008. Internalization theory and its impact on the field of international business. In J. J. Boddewyn (Ed), International business scholarship: AIB fellows on the first 50 years and beyond: Research in global strategic management, Vol. 14: 155–174. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. 2011. Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal’s classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 253–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A. 2014. Organizational innovation in nineteenth century railway investment: Peripheral countries in a global economy. Business History Review, 88(4): 709–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simson, V., & Jennings, A. 1992. Dishonored games: Corruption, money and greed at the Olympics. Toronto: Spi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölvell, Ö., & Zander, I. 1995. The dynamic multinational firm. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(1–2): 17–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2015. Jardine Matheson—Return to China (July 4).

  • Tomlinson, B. R. 1989. British business in India. In R. P. T. Davenport Hines & G. Jones (Eds), British business in Asia since 1860: 92–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. 2014. Replacing traditional economics with behavioural assumptions in constructing the Uppsala model: Toward a theory on the evolution of the multinational business enterprise (MBE). In J. J. Boddewyn (Ed), Multidisciplinary insights from new AIB fellows—Research in global strategic management, Vol. 16: 159–176. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeser, C. 2009. Concessions as a modernizing strategy in the Dominican Republic. Business History Review, 83(4): 731–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. 2003. The evolutionary view of the MNE and the future of internalization theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 498–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A. 2009. International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Greidanus, N. 2009. The end of opportunism versus trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope-concept in research on MNE governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1471–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2012. An internalization theory rationale for MNE regional strategy. Multinational Business Review, 20(2): 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2015. The new internalization theory and multinational enterprises from emerging economies: A business history perspective. Business History Review, 42(1): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, A., Zargarzadeh, M. A., & Osiyevskyym, O. 2014. Internalization theory, entrepreneurship and international new ventures. Multinational Business Review, 22(3): 246–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. 1983. Third World Multinationals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1970. The emergence of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from the colonial era to 1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1974. The maturing of multinational enterprise: American business abroad from 1914–1970. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1977. Modern European economic history and the multinationals. Journal of European Economic History, 6(3): 575–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1988. The free-standing company, 1870–1914: An important type of British foreign direct investment. Economic History Review, 41(2): 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1989. The history of foreign investment in the United States to 1914. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1998a. Multinational corporations: An historical account. In R. Kozul-Wright & R. Rowthorn (Eds), Transnational corporations and the global economy: 95–133. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1998b. The free-standing company revisited. In M. Wilkins & H. Schröter (Eds), The free-standing company in the world economy, 1830–1996: 3–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 1999. Cosmopolitan finance in the 1920s: New York’s emergence as an international financial centre. In R. Sylla, R. Tilly, & G. Tortella (Eds), The state, the financial system and economic modernization: Comparative historical perspectives: 271–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 2004a. Comparative hosts. Business History, 36(1): 18–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 2004b. The history of foreign investment in the US, 1914–1945. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 2009. Multinational enteprise in insurance: An historical overview. Business History, 51(3): 334–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M. 2015. The history of multinationals: A 2015 view. Business History Review, 89(3): 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, M., & Hill, F. E. 1964/2011. American business abroad: Ford in six continents. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wilkins, M., & Schröter, H. G. (Eds). 1998. The free-standing company in the world economy, 1830–1996. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organizations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1981a. The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4): 1537–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1981b. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. 1996. The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. 1954. History of unilever: A study in economic growth and social change. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. 1968. Unilever, 1945–1965: Challenge and response in the post-war industrial revolution. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wubs, B. 2008. International business and national war interests: Unilever between Reich and Empire, 1939–1945. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., & Goold, M. 1999. Effective headquarters staff: A guide to the size, structure and role of corporate headquarters staff in the UK. London: Ashridge Strategic Management Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, J. 2008. Industrial districts and regional clusters. In G. Jones & J. Zeitlin (Eds), The Oxford handbook of business history: 219–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Jones.

Additional information

Accepted by Alain Verbeke, Editor-in-Chief, 15 April 2018. This article has been with the authors for two revisions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Lopes, T., Casson, M. & Jones, G. Organizational innovation in the multinational enterprise: Internalization theory and business history. J Int Bus Stud 50, 1338–1358 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0156-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0156-6

Keywords

Navigation