Abstract
Marketing is a system and operational process which includes various interconnected subsystems, harmonising with contributor elements to reach maximum efficiency. In this quest to sustain the most efficient sales trend, “sales promotions” have an essential role in stimuli of sales trends. Although earlier studies treat promotions as an interim activity to dissolve excess stock, starting from the 1980s, promotions had been seen as a critical element in creating a sustainable sales trend for the products. This paper focuses on the significance of the effect of promotional decisions on mean level and volatility of category sales trend. We employed time series methods, including exogenous variables. In our investigative methodology, sales trend considered in two different contexts, first the current level of sales, which corresponds to an increase in average sales trend and later variability of sales, leading to change in the level of uncertainty in category sales. To illustrate this research question, we use data belonging to one of the largest supermarket chains in Turkey. Category sales data span for five years between 2014 and 2018 in daily frequency queried from the company's database. We select the “laundry powder detergents” category sales quantity as a pilot category. The study exhibits that promotion policy variables have a significant effect on the average level of category sales. However, the uncertainty caused through promotional variables has a weakly significant effect compared to their impacts on the mean level of sales. Our study verifies previous studies claiming promotional variables significantly positively affect the mean level of sales trend. Besides, we found concrete evidence that the volatility of sales trend has a diminishing effect on the trend, while most of this adverse effect stemming from sales series own endogenous volatility process, not promotional variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E.T., and E.J. Fox. 2019. How price promotions work: A review of practice and theory. In Handbook of the economics of marketing (vol. 1), 1st ed., ed. J.P. Dubé and P.F. Rossi, 497–552. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Aspley, J.C. 1945. The sales manager’s handbook. New York: Dartnell corporation.
Blattberg, R.C., R. Briesch, and E.J. Fox. 1995. How promotions work. Marketing Science 14 (3): G122–G132.
Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31 (3): 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.
Borden, N.H. 1964. The concept of the marketing mix. In Science in marketing, ed. G. Schwartz. New York: Wiley.
Box, G.E.P., and D.R. Cox. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological) 26: 11–252.
Box, G., and G. Jenkins. 1970. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Fransisco: Holden-Day.
Bruzda, J. 2020. Multistep quantile forecasts for supply chain and logistics operations: Bootstrapping, the GARCH model and quantile regression based approaches. Central European Journal of Operations Research 28: 309.
Bucklin, R.E., S. Gupta, and S. Siddarth. 1998. Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research 35 (2): 189–197.
Candent, C.G. 2017. 2017 Marketing Spend Study. Retrieved from http://cadentcg.com/wp-content/uploads/2017-Marketing-Spending-Study.pdf.
Catal, C., K. Ece, B. Arslan, and A. Akbulut. 2019. Benchmarking of regression algorithms and time series analysis techniques for sales forecasting. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7 (1): 20–26.
Chiang, J. 1991. A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy questions. Marketing Science 10 (4): 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.10.4.297.
Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (366a): 427–431.
Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49 (4): 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517.
Ducharme, B. 2005. 25 Years of Database History 25 Years of Database History (Starting in 1955 ). Retrieved May 14, 2021 from http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2005/12/25-years-of-database-history-s-1.html.
Engle, R.F. 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50 (4): 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773.
Engle, R.F., D.M. Lilien, and R.P. Robins. 1987. Estimating time varying risk premia in the term structure: The arch-M model. Econometrica 55 (2): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913242.
Fattah, J., L. Ezzine, Z. Aman, H. El Moussami, and A. Lachhab. 2018. Forecasting of demand using ARIMA model. International Journal of Engineering Business Management 10: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979018808673.
Fok, D. 2003. Advanced Econometric Marketing Models (ERIM PhD S). Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
Goad, N., J. Robinson, J.A. Callersten, A, Malby, and J. Opstrup. 2015. How retailers can improve promotion effectiveness. BCG Report.
Granger, C.W.J. 1989. Forecasting in business and economics (second). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
Guidolin, M., R. Guseo, and C. Mortarino. 2019. Regular and promotional sales in new product life cycles: Competition and forecasting. Computers & Industrial Engineering 130: 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIE.2019.02.026.
Gupta, S. 1988. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research 25 (4): 342–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172945.
Hanssens, D.M., L.J. Parsons, and R.L. Schultz. 1990. Response models in marketing. In Market response models, 3–26. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kurtz, D. L. (2012). Contemporary Marketing (15th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54 (1–3): 159–178.
Narasimhan, C., S.A. Neslin, and S.K. Sen. 1996. Promotional elasticities and category characteristics. Journal of Marketing 60 (2): 17–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251928.
Nijs, V.R., M.G. Dekimpe, J.-B.E.M. Steenkamps, and D.M. Hanssens. 2001. The category-demand effects of price promotions. Marketing Science 20 (1): 1–22.
Omar, H., V.H. Hoang, and D.R. Liu. 2016. A hybrid neural network model for sales forecasting based on ARIMA and search popularity of article titles. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9656453.
Pauwels, K., D.M. Hanssens, and S. Siddarth. 2002. The long-term effects of price promotions on category incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (4): 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.4.421.19114.
Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75 (2): 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
Raju, J.S. 1992. The effect of price promotions on variability in product category sales. Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.11.3.207.
Ramos, P., N. Santos, and R. Rebelo. 2015. Performance of state space and ARIMA models for consumer retail sales forecasting. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.12.015.
Soguero-Ruiz, C., F.-J. Gimeno-Blanes, I. Mora-Jiménez, M.P. Martínez-Ruiz, and J.-L. Rojo-Álvarez. 2012. On the differential benchmarking of promotional efficiency with machine learning modelling (II): Practical applications. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (17): 12784–12798. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2012.04.035.
Temür, A.S., M. Akgün, and G. Temür. 2019. Predicting housing sales in Turkey using Arima, Lstm and hybrid models. Journal of Business Economics and Management 20 (5): 920–938. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10190.
Van Heerde, H.J., S. Gupta, and D.R. Wittink. 2003. Is 75% of the sales promotion bump due to brand switching? No, only 33% is. Journal of Marketing Research 40 (4): 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.4.481.19386.
Van Heerde, H.J., P.S.H.H. Leeflang, and D.R. Wittink. 2004. Decomposing the sales promotion bump with store data. Marketing Science 23 (3): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0061.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeybek, Ö., Ülengin, B. The effect of sales promotions intensity on volume and variability in category sales of large retailers. J Market Anal 10, 19–29 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00121-y
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00121-y