Abstract
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) represents a multi-faceted approach to crime reduction that draws upon theories from urban design, psychology and criminology. Yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding CPTED’s definition and scope. CPTED has been defined by, amongst others Crowe (Crime prevention through environmental design: applications of architectural design and space management concepts, Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford, 2000), Ekblom (Eur J Crim Policy Res 17:7–28, 2011) and Armitage (Crime prevention through housing design: policy and practice, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 2013), and the principles upon which it is based have seen even greater discrepancy. Conscious that these principles have primarily been defined by academics and policy-makers, this research aims to rectify this imbalance. A sample of 22 incarcerated prolific burglars from three prisons (England), were asked to describe their response to 16 images of residential housing. The results confirm that the design of residential housing influences burglar decision making, but that the principles of CPTED should be re-examined, with surveillance, and physical security a clear deterrent, yet management and maintenance and defensible space not considered as important in offender decision making.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel, S. 1968. Discouraging Crime Through City Planning. Working Paper Number 75, Center for Planning and Development Research. Berkeley: University of California.
Armitage, R. 2000. An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing Within West Yorkshire. Home Office Briefing Note 7/00. London: Home Office.
Armitage, R. 2006. Predicting and Preventing: Developing a Risk Assessment Mechanism for Residential Housing. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 8 (3): 137–149.
Armitage, R. 2013. Crime Prevention through Housing Design: Policy and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Armitage, R., M. Monchuk, and M. Rogerson. 2010. It Looks Good, But What is it Like to Live There? Assessing the Impact of Award Winning Design on Crime. Special Volume of European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17 (1): 29–54.
Armitage, R., and L. Monchuk. 2011. Sustaining the Crime Reduction Impact of Secured by Design: 1999 to 2009. Security Journal 24 (4): 320–343.
Armitage, R., and C. Joyce. 2017. “Why My House?”: Exploring the Influence of Residential Housing Design on Burglar Decision-Making. In Re-building Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), ed. R. Armitage, and P. Ekblom. Oxfordshire: Taylor and Francis.
Ashton, J., B. Brown, B. Senior, and K. Pease. 1998. Repeat Victimisation: Offender Accounts. International Journal of Risk, Security and Crime Prevention 3: 269–279.
Bennett, T., and R. Wright. 1984. Burglars on Burglary. Prevention and the Offender. Vermont: Gower Publishing Company.
Bernasco, W., and F. Luykx. 2003. Effects of Attractiveness, Opportunity and Accessibility to Burglars on Residential Burglary Rates of Urban Neighborhoods. Criminology 41 (3): 981–1002.
Bernasco, W., and P. Nieuwbeerta. 2005. How do Residential Burglars Select Target Areas? British Journal of Criminology 44: 296–315.
Brown, J. (1999) An Evaluation of the Secured by Design Initiative in Gwent, South Wales. Unpublished MSc Dissertation, Scarman Centre for the Study of Public Order, Leicester.
Brown, B.B., and D. Bentley. 1993. Residential Burglars Judge Risk: The Role of Territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 51–61.
Brown, B.B., and I. Altman. 1983. Territoriality, Defensible Space and Residential Burglary: An Environmental Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 203–220.
Copes, H., and A. Hochstetler. 2014. Consenting to Talk: Why Inmates Participate in Prison Research. In In Their Own Words: Criminals on Crime, ed. P. Cromwell, and M. Birzer, 19–33. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cozens, P., D. Hillier, and G. Prescott. 2001. Defensible Space: Burglars and Police Evaluate Urban Residential Design. Security Journal 14 (4): 43–62.
Cozens, P., D. Hillier, and G. Prescott. 2002. Criminogenic Associations and British Housing Design. International Planning Studies 7 (2): 119–136.
Cozens, P., G. Saville, and D. Hillier. 2005. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED): A Review and Modern Bibliography. Property Management 23: 328–356.
Cromwell, P.F., J.N. Olson, and D.W. Avary. 1991. Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Crowe, T. 2000. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design: Applications of Architectural Design and Space Management Concepts, 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Ekblom, P. 2011. Deconstructing CPTED…and Reconstructing it for Practice, Knowledge, Management and Research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17: 7–28.
Everson, S. (2000) Repeat Offenders and Repeat Victims: Mutual Attraction or Misfortune? Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Huddersfield.
Groff, E.R., and N.G. LaVigne. 2001. Mapping an Opportunity Surface of Residential Burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38 (3): 257–278.
Hillier, B. 2004. Can Streets be Made Safer. Urban Design International 9: 31–45.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Jeffery, C.R. 1971. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Johnson, S., and K.J. Bowers. 2010. Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer? Quantitative Journal of Criminology 26 (1): 89–111.
Montoya, L., M. Junger, and Y. Ongen. 2016. The Relation Between Residential Property and its Surroundings and Day- and Night-Time Residential Burglary. Environment and Behavior 48: 515–549.
Nee, C., and M. Meenaghan. 2006. Expert Decision Making in Burglars. British Journal of Criminology 46: 935–949.
Newman, O. 1973. Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City. London: Architectural Press.
Pascoe, T. 1999. Evaluation of Secured by Design in Public Sector Housing: Final Report. Watford: BRE.
Police Crime Prevention Initiatives Limited. 2016. Secured by Design Homes 2016. http://www.securedbydesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Secured_by_Design_Homes_2016_V1.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2016
Poyner, B. 1983. Design Against Crime: Beyond Defensible Space. London: Butterworth.
Poyner, B., and B. Webb. 1991. Crime Free Housing. Oxford: Butterworth.
Rengert, G.F., and J.V. Wasilchick. 1985. Suburban Burglary. A Time and Place for Everything. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.
Taylor, R., and S.D. Gottfredson. 1987. Environmental Design, Crime and Prevention: An Examination of Community Dynamics. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of the Research 8: 387–416.
Teedon, P., Reid, T., Griffiths, P., Lindsay, K., Glen, S., McFayden, A., and Cruz, P. 2009. Secured by Design Impact Evaluation Final Report. Glasgow: Glasgow Caledonian University.
Teedon, P., T. Reid, P. Griffiths, and A. McFayden. 2010. Evaluating Secured by Design Door and Window Installations. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 12 (4): 246–262.
Tseloni, A., and Pease, K. 2003. Repeat Victimisation. ‘Boosts’ or ‘Flags’? British Journal of Criminology 43: 196–212.
Tseloni, A., R. Thompson, L.E. Grove, N. Tilley, and G. Farrell. 2014. The Effectiveness of Burglary Security Devices. Security Journal. doi:10.1057/sj.2014.30.
Van Der Voordt, T.J.M., and H.B.R. Van Wegen. 1990. Testing Building Plans for Public Safety: Usefulness of the Delft Checklist. Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 5 (2): 129–154.
Vollaard, B., and J.C. Ours. 2011. Does Regulation of Built-In Security Reduce Crime? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. The Economic Journal 121 (May): 485–504.
Wilson, J.Q., and G. Kelling. 1982. The Police and Neighbourhood Safety. The Atlantic 1982 (249): 29–38.
Winchester, S. and Jackson, H. 1982. Residential Burglary: The Limits of Prevention. Home Office Research Study Number 74. London: Home Office.
Wood, E. 1961. Housing Design: A Social Theory. New York: New York Citizens’ Housing and Planning Council.
Wright, R.T., and S. Decker. 1994. Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-Ins. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Armitage, R. Burglars’ take on crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): reconsidering the relevance from an offender perspective. Secur J 31, 285–304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-017-0101-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-017-0101-6