Skip to main content
Log in

Entry and Survival in the Export Market: Spillovers from Foreign and Outward-Looking Domestic Firms in Ethiopia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines spillovers from domestic-exporting and foreign-owned firms to the export entry and exit of local manufacturing firms in Ethiopia for the period 1996-2010. We find that downstream and upstream foreign-owned exporting firms improve the probability of domestic firms’ entering into export markets. Besides, foreign-owned exporting firms generate intraindustry spillovers that increase the export entry and survival rates of local firms. Spillovers from domestic exporters enhance the exporting likelihood of firms in input-supplying sectors. Moreover, exporting domestic and foreign-owned firms generate backward productivity spillovers that advance the export entry and survival of domestic firms through productivity gains.

Résumé

Cet article étudie les retombées des entreprises étrangères exportatrices de produits locaux sur les exportations des entreprises manufacturières locales en Éthiopie de 1996 à 2010. Nous constatons que les entreprises étrangères exportatrices présentes en aval et en amont augmentent la probabilité que les entreprises nationales pénètrent sur les marchés de l’exportation. En outre, les entreprises étrangères exportatrices génèrent des externalités intra-industrie qui augmentent les taux d’entrée sur les marchés d’exportation et de survie des entreprises locales. Les retombées des exportateurs de produits locaux augmentent la probabilité d’exportation des entreprises des secteurs de l’approvisionnement. En outre, les entreprises étrangères exportatrices de produits locaux génèrent des retombées tardives et positives sur la productivité, favorisant l’entrée sur le marché d’exportation des entreprises nationales, ainsi que leur survie, grâce aux gains de productivité.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On the literature seeking to distinguish between learning from exporting and self-selection, see Melitz (2003), Clerides et al. (1998), Bernard and Jensen (1999), and Alvarez and Lopez (2005).

  2. Widely applied approaches to control for endogeneity of input choices include those of Olley and Pakes (1996) and Levinsohn and Petrin (2003).

  3. The system-GMM approach accounts for endogeneities of the input choices, spillover indexes, and firm characteristics such as export status and import ratio.

  4. Foreign ownership of firms is defined by at least 10% equity (paid-up capital) share.

  5. It was prepared by the Ethiopian Development Research Institute in collaboration with the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. Detailed documentation on the SAM can be found in Tebekew et al. (2009).

  6. The data have been used in many studies, including those of Shiferaw (2007), Bigsten and Gebreeyesus (2009), and Bigsten and Gebreeyesus (2007).

  7. In subsequent discussions, we refer to wearing apparel and tanning leather and footwear sectors as apparel and leather, respectively.

  8. The entry (exit) rate shown in Table 1 is a ratio of the number of firms starting (quitting) exporting in the current year to the total number of exporting firms in the previous year.

  9. The horizontal spillover from foreign-owned firms in sector j, \(Hor\_for_{jt} = s_{jt}^{f} /s_{jt}\), is computed as the sales share of foreign-owned firms in the total sales of the sector; and the horizontal spillover from exporting firms, \({\text{Hor}}\_{\text{export}}_{jt} = E_{jt} /s_{jt}\), is the share of total exports in the total sales of the sector. Following the spillover indexes in “Spillover Indexes” section, we construct aggregate backward and forward indexes as well.

References

  • Aitken, B.J., and A.E. Harrison. 1999. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89 (3): 605–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, B., G.H. Hanson, and A.E. Harrison. 1997. Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. Journal of International Economics 43 (1–2): 103–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R., and R.A. Lopez. 2005. Exporting and performance: Evidence from Chilean plants. Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (4): 1384–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R., and R.A. Lopez. 2008. Is exporting a source of productivity spillovers? Review of World Economics 144 (4): 723–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendolagine, V., A. Boly, N.D. Coniglio, F. Prota, and A. Seric. 2013. FDI and local linkages in developing countries: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 50: 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, S., H. Gorg, and E. Strobl. 2003. Explaining firms export behaviour: R&D, spillovers and the destination market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65 (4): 475–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B., and J.B. Jensen. 1999. Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics 47 (1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besedes, T., and T.J. Prusa. 2006. Product differentiation and duration of US import trade. Journal of International Economics 70 (2): 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besedes, T., and T. Prusa. 2007. The role of extensive and intensive margins and export growth. NBER Working Paper 13628.

  • Bigsten, A., and M. Gebreeyesus. 2007. The small, the young, and the productive: Determinants of manufacturing firm growth in Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 55 (4): 813–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigsten, A., and M. Gebreeyesus. 2009. Firm productivity and exports: Evidence from Ethiopian manufacturing. The Journal of Development Studies 45 (10): 1594–1614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomstrom, M., and F. Sjöholm. 1999. Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? European Economic Review 43 (4): 915–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerides, S.K., S. Lach, and J.R. Tybout. 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 903–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., H. Görg, and M. Pisu. 2008. Exporting, linkages and productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics 41 (1): 320–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorg, H., and D. Greenaway. 2004. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer 19 (2): 171–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorg, H., and E. Strobl. 2005. Spillovers from foreign firms through worker mobility: An empirical investigation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 107 (4): 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., N. Sousa, and K. Wakelin. 2004. Do domestic firms learn to export from multinationals? European Journal of Political Economy 20 (4): 1027–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. 2013. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, M., and A. Harrison. 1993. Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment. Journal of Development Economics 42: 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.I., and Q.C. Li. 2011. The determinants of firm exit from exporting: Evidence for the UK. International Journal of the Economics of Business 18 (3): 381–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havranek, T., and Z. Irsova. 2011. Estimating vertical spillovers from FDI: Why results vary and what the true effect is. Journal of Development Economics 85 (2): 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, W., and M. Persson. 2012. The duration of trade revisited. Empirical Economics 43 (3): 1083–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilmakunnas, P., and S. Nurmi. 2010. Dynamics of export market entry and exit. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 112 (1): 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B.S. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 94 (3): 605–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S.P. 2005. Survival analysis. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.176.7572&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2019.

  • Kneller, R., and M. Pisu. 2007. Industrial linkages and export spillovers from FDI. The World Economy 30 (1): 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. 1994. Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics 43 (2): 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71 (6): 1695–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, G.S., and A. Pakes. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment. Econometrica 64 (6): 1263–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., A. Skrondal, and A. Pickles. 2004. Gllamm manual. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiferaw, A. 2007. Competitive selection and technological capabilities in Ethiopian manufacturing. The European Journal of Development Research 19 (1): 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebekew, T., A. Amoge, B. Teferra, et al. 2009. Ethiopia Input Output Table and Social Accounting Matrix 2005/06. Ethiopian Development Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in collaboration with the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

  • Van Biesebroeck, J. 2005. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Journal of International Economics 67 (2): 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldkirch, A., and A. Ofosu. 2010. Foreign presence, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from Ghana. World Development 38 (8): 1114–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willenbockel, D., and S. Robinson. 2008. GTAP 7 Data Base DocumentationChapter 7 I-O Table: Ethiopia (Center for Global Trade Analysis). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN: Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP). https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/res_display.asp?RecordID=2916. Accessed 29 Sept 2019. 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melaku Abegaz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We are very grateful to an anonymous referee for very detailed and helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abegaz, M., Lahiri, S. Entry and Survival in the Export Market: Spillovers from Foreign and Outward-Looking Domestic Firms in Ethiopia. Eur J Dev Res 32, 847–872 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00242-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00242-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation