Skip to main content
Log in

Philosophy as political technē: The tradition of invention in Simondon’s political thought

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

Gilbert Simondon has recently attracted the interest of political philosophers and theorists, despite the fact that he is renowned as a philosopher of technics – author of Of the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects – who also elaborated a general theory of complex systems in Individuation in the Light of the Notions of Form and Information. A group of scholars has developed Gilles Deleuze’s early suggestion that Simondon’s social ontology might offer the basis for a re-theorisation of radical democracy. Others, following Herbert Marcuse, have instead focused on Simondon’s analysis of the relationship between technology and society. However, only a joint study of Simondon’s two major works can reveal their implicit political stakes. As I will argue, Simondon’s anti-Aristotelianism and his anti-Heideggerian understanding of the Greek origins of philosophy, allow us to conceive philosophical thought as a ‘tradition of invention’, that is, a pedagogical technē endowed with the political task of maintaining the openness of the social system and allowing normative invention to emerge from within.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1991) The Complete Works of Aristotle, Translated by J. Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Balibar, É. (1997) Spinoza: from Individuality to Transindividuality. Mededelingen vanwege Het Spinozahuis 71: 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, A. (2015) Epistemology and Political Philosophy in Gilbert Simondon: Individuation, Technics, Social Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bardin, A. (2016) La société, «machine autant que vie»: régulation et invention politique entre Wiener, Canguilhem et Simondon. In: V. Bontems (ed.) Gilbert Simondon et l'invention du futur. Actes de la décade des 5-15 août 2013 du Centre culturel international de Cerisy-la-Salle. Paris: Klincksieck, pp. 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy, J.H. (2008) Simondon ou l’encyclopédisme génétique. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy, J.H. (2015) Life and Technology: An Inquiry into and Beyond Simondon. Luneburg: Meson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1932) Les deux sources de la moralité et de la religion. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti, E. (2004) The Reception of Aristotle’s Intellectual Virtues in Gadamer and the Hermeneutic Philosophy. In: R. Pozzo (ed.) The Impact of Aristotelianism on Modern Philosophy. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press, pp. 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (1998) The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (2002) Le problème des régulations dans l’organisme et dans la société. In: Écrits sur la médecine. Paris: Seuil, pp. 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrozzini, G. (2011) Gilbert Simondon filosofo della Mentalité technique. Milano: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, M. (2013) Gilbert Simondon and the Philosophy of the Transindividual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boever et al. (2012) Being and Technology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1966) Gilbert Simondon, L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. In: L’île déserte et autres textes. Paris: Minuit, pp. 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Lucchese, F. (2009) Monstrous individuations: Deleuze, Simondon, and relational ontology. Differences 20(2–3): 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, L. (2012) Apeiron et physis: Simondon transducteur des Présocratiques. Cahiers Simondon 4: 33–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. (2009) Back to the Rough Ground. Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, A. (1991) Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guchet, X. (2010) Pour un humanisme technologique. Culture, technique et société dans la philosophie de Gilbert Simondon. Paris: PUF.

  • Guchet, X. (2011) Technology, sociology, humanism: Simondon and the problem of the human sciences. SubStance 129(41/3): 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A.D. (2007) Body Politic: Political Metaphor and Political Violence. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1992) Parmenides. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) Basic Writings. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1998a) Off the Beaten Track. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1998b) Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2008) Basic Concepts of Ancient Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, E. (1957) The King’s Two Bodies: a Study in Mediaeval Political Theology.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1943–45) Evolution et techniques, 2 vols. Paris: Albin Michel.

  • Loeve, S. (2011) Technique, travail et anthropologie chez Arendt et Simondon. Cahiers Simondon 3: 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964) One-dimensional Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, O. (1986) Authority, Liberty and Automatic Machinery in Early Modern Europe. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlanger, J. (1995) Les métaphores de l’organisme. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (1989[1958]) Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier.

  • Simondon, G. (2005a[1958]) L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et information. Grenoble: Gerome Million.

  • Simondon, G. (2005b) L’Invention dans les techniques. Paris: Seuil.

  • Simondon, G. (2008) Imagination et invention. Chatou: La Transparence.

  • Simondon, G. (2010) The Limits of Human Progress: A Critical Study. Cultural Politics6(2): 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2012) Technical Mentality. In: De Boever et al. (eds.) Being and Technology.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2014) Sur la technique. Paris: PUF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simondon, G. (2015) Culture and Technics. Radical Philosophy 189: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simondon. G. (1964) Gilbert Simondon, L’individu et sa genèse physico-biologique. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998), Technics and Time 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2009) The Theatre of Individuation: Phase-Shift and Resolution in Simondon and Heidegger. Pharresia 7: 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, A. (2006) The theatre of production: philosophy and individuation between Kant and Deleuze. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Caneghem, D. (1989) Hommage à Gilbert Simondon. Bulletin de Psychologie 42(392): 815–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpi, F. (1994) Being and Time: A ‘Translation’ of the Nichomachean Ethics? In: T. Kisiel and J. Van Buren (eds.) Reading Heidegger From the Start. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpi, F. (2010) Heidegger e Aristotele. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1954) The Human use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this work were presented in 2015 and 2016 at the Universidad de Buenos Aires, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. I would like to thank all the convenors and the audience members, as well as the two anonymous reviewers, for their questions, suggestions and corrections. I am greatly indebted to colleagues from the University of Padua, Brunel University and the Centre international des études simondoniennes for the stimulating exchanges during these years, and I am especially grateful to Giovanni Menegalle for his extensive comments on and careful criticisms of the present article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Bardin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bardin, A. Philosophy as political technē: The tradition of invention in Simondon’s political thought. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 417–436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0210-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0210-y

Keywords

Navigation