Abstract
Recent research applying the energy–stability–area (ESA) model to politically oriented, federated voluntary membership associations in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries has found that these organizations had additional capacity for membership. Yet, this approach does not tell us whether associations’ organizational densities restricted the growth and formation of new federated chapters because of density dependence, a finding common in modern ESA studies. Furthermore, it is not clear whether other voluntary associations, such as fraternal orders, faced similar challenges. Here, we begin to explore these questions by examining whether federated, political and non-political voluntary associations faced density dependence in both membership and the number of affiliated organizations at the state level. We find evidence that density dependence was a common concern for voluntary associations of all types. Both in terms of the number of local-level federated groups and, to a lesser extent, membership, these groups were so successful that environmental resources eventually limited their growth during this pivotal era for the development of pressure groups and civic participation in the USA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Masons, the most established and elite of the fraternal orders, did not maintain national records of state-level associations.
The 1910 report is missing from our dataset.
For a more complete explanation of these measures, please see Chamberlain et al. (2019a).
While we could exclude the black population, as African Americans were excluded from these associations, there were parallel black orders of the Odd Fellows and Knights of Pythias.
There is no theoretical reason to believe that partisan control would affect fraternal organization formation. Testing fraternal association models with the Ranney Index reveals no significant relationship.
Log–log models (not shown) that transform the similarly right-skewed constituent variables also find no evidence of density dependence, mirroring the linear regression models but without the heteroskedasticity concerns.
The KoP’s relatively strong presence in the South, where state governments spent less, likely explains this relationship.
Even for the Grange, the predictors are signed in the appropriate direction and approach, but do not reach, statistical significance.
Furthermore, women’s clubs could choose not to federate with the state and/or national association directly.
It could also help to centralize efforts at retaining members, as membership turnover in federated voluntary associations was a consistent issue (see Chamberlain et al. in press).
References
Ainsworth, Scott. 1995a. Electoral Strength and the Emergence of Group Influence in the Late 1800s: The Grand Army of the Republic. American Politics Quarterly 23(3): 319–338.
Ainsworth, Scott. 1995b. Lobbyists as Interest Group Entrepreneurs: The Mobilization of Union Veterans. American Review of Politics 16(3): 107–129.
Ainsworth, Scott H., and John Anthony Maltese. 1996. National Grange Influence on the Supreme Court Confirmation of Stanley Matthews. Social Science History 20(1): 41–62.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Beth L. Leech. 2001. Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 1191–1213.
Beito, David T. 1999. To Advance the Practice of Thrift and Economy: Fraternal Societies and Social Capital, 1890–1920. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29(4): 585–612.
Beito, David T. 2000. From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State: Fraternal Societies and Social Services, 1890–1967. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Berkhout, Joost, Brendan J. Carroll, Caelesta Braun, Adam W. Chalmers, Tine Destrooper, David Lowers, Simon Otjes, and Anne Rasmussen. 2015. Interest Organizations Across Economic Sectors: Explaining Interest Group Density in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 462–480.
Binkley, Cameron. 2002. ‘No Better Heritage Than Living Trees’: Women’s Clubs and Early Conservation in Humboldt County. Western Historical Quarterly 33(2): 179–203.
Chamberlain, Adam. 2009. Population Ecology and Niche Seeking in the Development of Gay and Lesbian Rights Groups. Social Science Journal 46(4): 656–670.
Chamberlain, Adam, Alixandra B. Yanus, and Nicholas Pyeatt. 2017. From Reconstruction to Reform: Modernization and the Interest Group State, 1875–1900. Social Science History 41(4): 705–730.
Chamberlain, Adam, Alixandra B. Yanus, and Nicholas Pyeatt. 2019a. Revisiting the ESA Model: A Historical Test. Interest Groups & Advocacy 8(1): 23–43.
Chamberlain, Adam, Alixandra B. Yanus, and Nicholas Pyeatt. 2019b. Uniting the Living through the Dead: How Voluntary Associations Made Death a Selective Benefit. Interest Groups & Advocacy 8(4): 600–620.
Chamberlain, Adam, Alixandra B. Yanus, and Nicholas Pyeatt. N.D. Exploring the Legend of a ‘Nation of Joiners’: A Research Note. The Social Science Journal (in press).
Clawson, Mary Ann. 1989. Constructing Brotherhood: Class, Gender, and Fraternalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1993. Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920. American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 755–798.
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise, and Theda Skocpol. 2001. The Rush to Organize: Explaining Associational Formation in the United States, 1860s–1920s. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 813–829.
David, Lowery, Virginia Gray, John Cluverius, and Jeffrey J. Harden. 2012. Explaining the Anomalous Growth of Public Sector Lobbying in the American States, 1997–2007. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43(4): 580–599.
Dearing, Mary. 1952. Veterans in Politics: The Story of the GAR. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dusso, Aaron. 2010. Legislation, Political Context, and Interest Group Behavior. Political Research Quarterly 63(1): 55–67.
Emery, J.C.Herbert. 2006. From Defining Characteristic to Vitiation of Principle: The History of the Odd Fellows’ Stipulated Sick Benefit and Its Implications for Studying American Fraternalism. Social Science History 30(4): 479–500.
Emery, George, and J.C. Herbert Emery. 1999. A Young Man’s Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada, 1860–1929. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Gamm, Gerald, and Robert D. Putnam. 1999. The Growth of Voluntary Associations in America, 1840–1940. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29(4): 511–557.
General Federation of Women’s Clubs. 1910. General Federation of Women’s Clubs Directory, October 1910. No publisher available.
Glenn, Brian J. 2001. Fraternal Rhetoric and the Development of the U.S. Welfare State. Studies in American Political Development 15(2): 220–233.
Grand Army of the Republic. 1916. Journal of the Forty-Ninth Encampment, Grand Army of the Republic. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. Environmental Limits on the Diversity of State Interest Organization Systems: A Population Ecology Interpretation. Political Research Quarterly 49(1): 103–118.
Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 2000. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 2001. The Expression of Density Dependence in State Communities of Organized Interests. American Politics Research 29(4): 374–391.
Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman. 1977. The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 929–964.
Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman. 1988. The Ecology of Organizational Mortality: American Labor Unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology 94(4): 25–52.
Hannan, Michael T., and John Freeman. 1989. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Hutchinson, G.Evelyn. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia; or, Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? American Naturalist 93(870): 145–159.
Improved Order of Red Men. 1911. Record of the Great Council of the United States of the Improved Order of Red Men, Sixty-Fourth Great Sun Council. No publisher available.
Independent Order of Odd Fellows. 1910. Journal of Proceedings of the Eighty-Sixth Annual Communication of the Sovereign Grand Lodge of the Independent Order of Odd Fellows. Baltimore: The Sovereign Grand Lodge, IOOF.
Interstate Commerce Commission. 1907. List of National, State, and Local Commercial Organizations and National, State, and Local Agricultural Associations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Kattelman, Kyle T. 2015. Legislative Professionalism and Group Concentration: The ESA Model Revisited. Interest Groups & Advocacy 4(2): 165–184.
Kaufman, Jason. 2003. For the Common Good? American Civic Life and the Golden Age of Fraternity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaufman, Jason, and David Weintraub. 2004. Social-Capital Formation and American Fraternal Association: New Empirical Evidence. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 35(1): 1–36.
Knights of Pythias. 1910. Official Record of Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Convention of the Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias. Nashville: Brandon Printing Company.
Lack, David. 1954. The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.
Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray. 1995. The Population Ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the Natural Regulation of Interest Group Numbers in the American States. American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–29.
Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray. 1998. Representational Concentration and Interest Community Size: A Population Ecology Interpretation. Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 919–944.
McCammon, Holly J. 1995. The Politics of Protection: State Minimum Wage and Maximum Hours Laws for Women in the United States, 1870–1930. Sociological Quarterly 36(2): 217–249.
McConnell, Stuart. 1997. Glorious Contentment: The Grand Army of the Republic, 1865–1900. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Merchant, Carolyn. 1984. Women of the Progressive Conservation Movement: 1900–1916. Environmental Review 8(1): 57–85.
Mezvinsky, Norton. 1961. Scientific Temperance Instruction in the Schools. History of Education Quarterly 1(1): 48–56.
Nordin, Dennis Sven. 1974. Rich Harvest: A History of the Grange, 1867–1900. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
Nownes, Anthony. 2004. The Population Ecology of Interest Group Formation: Mobilizing for Gay and Lesbian Rights in the United States, 1950–1998. British Journal of Political Science 34(1): 49–67.
Nownes, Anthony, and Daniel Lipinski. 2005. The Population Ecology of Interest Group Death: Gay and Lesbian Rights Groups in the United States, 1945–1998. British Journal of Political Science 35(2): 303–319.
Odegard, Peter H. 1928. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York: Columbia University Press.
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Fall of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Patrons of Husbandry. 1910. Journal of Proceedings of the National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry, Forty-Fourth Annual Session. Concord: The Rumford Press.
Rimby, Susan. 2005. ‘Better Housekeeping Out of Doors’: Mira Lloyd Dock, the State Federation of Pennsylvania Women, and Progressive Era Conservation. Journal of Women’s History 17(3): 9–34.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Skocpol, Theda, Marjorie Abend-Wein, Christopher Howard, and Susan Goodrich Lehmann. 1993. Women’s Associations and the Enactment of Mothers’ Pensions in the United States. American Political Science Review 87(3): 686–701.
Skocpol, Theda, Marshall Ganz, and Ziad Munson. 2000. A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review 94(3): 527–546.
Sparks, Cheryl Logan, and Peter R. Walniuk. 1995. The Enactment of Mothers’ Pensions: Civic Mobilization and Agenda Setting or Benefits of the Ballot? American Political Science Review 89(3): 710–720.
Tichenor, Daniel J., and Richard A. Harris. 2002–2003. Organized Interests and American Political Development. Political Science Quarterly 117(4): 587–612.
Tichenor, Daniel J., and Richard A. Harris. 2005. The Development of Interest Group Politics in America: Beyond the Conceits of Modern Times. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 251–270.
Tyler, Helen E. 1949. Where Prayer and Purpose Meet: The WCTU Story. Evanston: The Signal Press.
Velk, Tom, and A.R. Riggs. 1990. Getting Down to Business: Tactics and Ethics of the National Grange, 1905–1911. American Economist 34(2): 46–54.
Watson, Paula D. 1994. Founding Mothers: The Contribution of Women’s Organizations to Public Library Development in the United States. Library Quarterly: Information, Community, and Policy 64 (3): 233–269.
Wells, Mildred White. 1953. Unity in Diversity: The History of the General Federation of Women’s Clubs. Washington, DC: General Federation of Women’s Clubs.
Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. 1915. Report of the Forty-Second Annual Convention of the National Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. Evanston: Signal Press.
Wood, Mary I. 1912. The History of the General Federation of Women’s Clubs. New York: History Department, General Federation of Women’s Clubs.
Zimmerman, Jonathan. 1992. ‘The Queen of the Lobby’: Mary Hunt, Scientific Temperance, and the Dilemma of Democratic Education in America, 1879-1906. History of Education Quarterly 32(1): 1–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chamberlain, A., Yanus, A.B. & Pyeatt, N. Expanding the energy–stability–area model: density dependence in voluntary membership associations in the early twentieth century. Int Groups Adv 9, 57–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-019-00075-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41309-019-00075-8