Abstract
This paper explores the application of positioning theory to public diplomacy as a way to develop the theorization and empirical investigation of dialogue in the literature. First, it offers an overview of how dialogue has been conceptualized in the new public diplomacy. Secondly, it argues that there are two main problems with its current conceptualization: it is based on normative theories of communication and it does not take sufficiently into account the context where the communicative act occurs. In line with existing critical approaches to public diplomacy, the paper applies positioning theory to public diplomacy through the analysis of the case study of the Euro-Mediterranean intercultural dialogue. The preliminary conclusion is that positioning theory can enrich the theoretical foundations and empirical research of dialogue in public diplomacy and expand the use of social constructivism in IR by investigating the conditions of possibility for dialogue when relationships become mired with conflict, power, and difference.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arsenault, A. 2009. Public diplomacy 2.0. Toward a new public diplomacy, 135–153. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baert, F., L. Van Langenhove, and M. James. 2019. Rethinking role theory in foreign policy analysis: Introducing positioning theory to international relations. Papers on Social Representations 28 (1): 4.1-4.20.
Baert, P. 2015. The existentialist moment: The rise of Sartre as a public intellectual. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. 2003. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bouris, D., and T. Schumacher. 2017. The revised European neighbourhood policy: Continuity and change in EU foreign policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brockmier, J., and R. Harré. 1997. Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4): 263–283.
Brown, R. 2013. The politics of relational public diplomacy. Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift, 56–57. London: Routledge.
Buber, M. 1958. I and Thou/with a postscript by the author added; translated by Ronald Gregor Smith. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Carbaugh, D., E.V. Nuciforo, M. Saito, and D. Shin. 2011. “Dialogue” in cross-cultural perspective: Japanese, Korean, and Russian discourses. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 4 (2): 87–108.
Cebeci, M. (2017). The EU’s Construction of the Mediterranean. MedReset Policy Paper 1,
Comor, E., and H. Bean. 2012. America’s ‘engagement’ delusion. International Communication Gazette 74 (3): 203–220.
Council of the European Union. “Presidency Conclusions for the Euro-Mediterranean Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs (The Hague 29–30 November 2004), 14869/04 (Presse 331)
Council of the European Union. “Presidency Conclusions for the Mid-Term Euro-Mediterranean Conference” (Crete 26–27 May 2003), 9890/03 (Presse 151)
Council of the European Union. “Presidency Conclusions for the Euro-Mediterranean Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs (Naples 2–3 December 2003), 15380/03 (Presse 353)
Council of the European Union. “Presidency Conclusions for the Vth Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Foreign Ministers” (Valencia 22–23 April 2002), 8254/02 (Presse 112)
Council of the European Union. “Presidency Conclusions for the Euro-Mediterranean Mid-Term Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs” (Dublin 5–6 May 2004), 9064/04 (Presse 137)
Cowan, G., and A. Arsenault. 2008. Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 10–30.
Dahlberg, L. 2013. The Habermasian public sphere and exclusion: An engagement with poststructuralist-influenced critics. Communication Theory 24 (1): 21–41.
Davies, B., and R. Harré. 1990. Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
Deetz, S., and J. Simpson. 2004. Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of “otherness.” In Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies, 141–158. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dolea, A. 2018. Public diplomacy as co-constructed discourses of engagement. In The handbook of communication engagement, 331–345. Hoboken: Wiley.
Dolea, A. 2015. The need for critical thinking in country promotion: Public diplomacy, nation branding and public relations. In The Routledge Handbook of critical public relations, 274–288. Hoboken: Wiley.
Dutta-Bergman, M.J. 2006. U.S. Public Diplomacy in the Middle East. Journal of Communication Inquiry 30 (2): 102–124.
European Union. 2016. Towards an EU Strategy for International Cultural Relations, Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. https://ec.europa.eu/culture/policies/strategic-framework/strategy-international-cultural-relations_en
Ferri, G. 2014. Ethical communication and intercultural responsibility: A philosophical perspective. Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2013.866121.
Fitzpatrick, K. 2013. Public diplomacy and ethics: From soft power to social conscience. In Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift, 41–55. London: Routledge.
Fitzpatrick, K. R. 2011. US Public Diplomacy in a Post 9/11World: From Messaging to Mutuality. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy, Paper 6
Fitzpatrick, K.R. 2010. The future of U.S. Public Diplomacy: An uncertain fate. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Ganesh, S., and H.M. Zoller. 2012. Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory 22 (1): 66–91.
Gilboa, E. 2008. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 55–77.
Gorski, P.C. 2008. Good intentions are not enough: A decolonizing intercultural education. Intercultural Education 19 (6): 515–525.
Graham, S.E. 2014. Emotion and public diplomacy: Dispositions in international communications, dialogue, and persuasion. International Studies Review 16 (4): 522–539.
Gregory, B. 2008. Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 274–290.
Habermas, J. 1986. The theory of communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
Handelman, D. 2008. Afterword: Returning to cosmology—Thoughts on the positioning of belief. Social Analysis 52 (1): 181–195.
Harré, R. 2012. Positioning theory: Moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0010.
Harré, R., F.M. Moghaddam, T.P. Cairnie, D. Rothbart, and S.R. Sabat. 2009. Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology 19 (1): 5–31.
Harré, R., and F.M. Moghaddam. 2003. The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. Westport: Praeger.
Harré, R., and N. Slocum. 2003. Disputes as complex social events: On the uses of positioning theory. In The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, 123–136. West Port: Political and Cultural Contexts. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Harré, R., and L. Van Langenhove. 1991. Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (4): 393–407.
Harrison, T.R., and J.W. Muhamad. 2018. Engagement in conflict. In The handbook of communication engagement, 187–204. Hoboken: Wiley.
Hermans, H., and A. Hermans-Konopka. 2010. Dialogical self theory positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hollway, W. 1984. Gender differences and the production of subjectivity. In Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, 227–263. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis Group.
James, M. 2014. Positioning theory and strategic communications: A new approach to public relations research and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
James, M. 2010. The Use of Intentional Positioning Techniques in Government Agencies’ Communication Campaigns, Government Communication: Proceedings of the 17th International Public Relations Research Symposium BledCom, pp. 140–137
Kennedy, A.K., and E.J. Sommerfeldt. 2018. Habits of the heart and mind. In The Handbook of Communication Engagement, 357–370. Hoboken: Wiley.
Louis, W.R. 2008. Intergroup positioning and power. In Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis, 21–39. New York: Springer.
Macdonald, M.N., P. Holmes, and V. Crosbie. 2014. Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (2): 151–155.
Maclennan, J. 2011. “To build a beautiful dialogue”: Capoeira as contradiction. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 4 (2): 146–162.
Melissen, J. 2005. Wielding soft power: The new public diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael.”
Miller, D. 2013. The morality play: Getting to the heart of media influence on foreign policy. In: Foreign correspondence. London: Routledge.
Moghaddam, F.M., and R. Harré. 2010. Words of conflict, words of war: How the language we use in political processes sparks fighting. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Moghaddam, F.M., R. Harré, and N. Lee. 2008. Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis. New York: Springer.
Moghaddam, F.M., and K.A. Kavulich. 2008. Nuclear positioning and supererogatory duties: The illustrative case of positioning by Iran, the United States and the European Union. In Global conflict resolution through positioning analysi, 247–260. New York: Springer.
Mor, B.D. 2007. The rhetoric of public diplomacy and propaganda wars: A view from self-presentation theory. European Journal of Political Research 46 (5): 661–683.
O’Loughlin, B. 2013. Book review: New public diplomacy in the 21st century: A comparative study of policy and practice, New public diplomacy in the 21st century: A comparative study of policy and practice. Media, War & Conflict 6 (3): 330–332.
Pacher, A. 2018. Strategic publics in public diplomacy: A typology and a heuristic device for multiple publics. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 13 (3): 272–296.
Pamment, J. 2013. New public diplomacy in the 21 century: A comparative study of policy and practice. London: Routledge.
Phipps, A. 2014. ‘They are bombing now’: ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in times of conflict. Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 108–124.
Riis, H.B. 2017. It doesn’t matter if you’re Black or White: Negotiating identity and danishness in intercultural dialogue meetings. Journal of Intercultural Studies 38 (6): 694–707.
Riitaoja, A., and F. Dervin. 2014. Interreligious dialogue in schools: Beyond asymmetry and categorisation? Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 76–90.
Riordan, S. 2005. Dialogue-based public diplomacy: A new foreign policy paradigm? In The new public diplomacy, 180–195. New York: Springer.
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Saunders, H.H. 2013. The relational paradigm and sustained dialogue. In Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift, 140–151. London: Routledge.
Schmidle, R. 2008. Positioning and military leadership. In Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis, 189–206. New York: Springer.
Scott-Smith, G. 2008. Mapping the undefinable: Some thoughts on the relevance of exchange programs within international relations theory. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 173–195.
Sevin, E. 2015. Pathways of connection: An analytical approach to the impacts of public diplomacy. Public Relations Review 41 (4): 562–568.
Slocum-Bradley, N. 2008. Discursive production of conflict in Rwanda. In Global conflict resolution through positioning analysis, 207–226. New York: Springer.
Theunissen, P. 2018. Philosophy and ethics of engagement. In The handbook of communication engagement, 49–60. Hoboken: Wiley.
Trobbiani, R. 2017. EU cultural diplomacy in the MENA region: A qualitative mapping of initiatives promoting regional cooperation, Working Paper, EL-CSID, issue 2017/2, pp. 1–47
Van Ham, P. 2008. Place branding: The state of the art. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 126–149.
Van Ham, P. 2002. Branding territory: Inside the wonderful worlds of PR and IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (2): 249–269.
Van Langenhove, L. 2017. Varieties of moral orders and the dual structure of society: A perspective from positioning theory. Frontiers in Sociology 2: 9.
Van Langenhove, L. 2011. People and societies. London: Routledge.
Van Langenhove, H. 1999. Positioning theory: Moral contexts of international action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Van Langenhove, L., and R. Harré. 1994. Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (4): 359–372.
Vanc, A.M., and K.R. Fitzpatrick. 2016. Scope and status of public diplomacy research by public relations scholars, 1990–2014. Public Relations Review 42 (3): 432–440.
Weizman, E. 2008. Positioning in media dialogue: Negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wise, D., and M. James. 2013. Positioning a price on carbon: Applying a proposed hybrid method of positioning discourse analysis for public relations. Public Relations Inquiry 2 (3): 327–352.
Witteborn, S. 2011. Discursive grouping in a virtual forum: Dialogue, difference, and the “intercultural.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 4 (2): 109–126.
Zaharna, R.S. 2018. Culture and communication insights from public diplomacy. In The handbook of communication engagement, 313–330. Hoboken: Wiley.
Zaharna, R.S. 2014. Battles to bridges: Us strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zaharna, R.S., A. Arsenault, and A. Fisher. 2013. Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift. London: Routledge.
Zaharna, R.S. 2010. Battles to bridges: U.S. strategic communication and public diplomacy after 9/11. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavón-Guinea, A. Conflict, power, and difference in dialogue: a conversation between public diplomacy and positioning theory. Place Brand Public Dipl 20, 44–54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00207-5
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00207-5