Abstract
Ukraine has long been perceived internationally as a troubled post-Soviet country with crucial internal divisions. The “cleft” country narrative was dominant across media, expert, and even academic discourses. The 2022 full-scale unprovoked invasion by Russia has led, among other things, to the striking change of narrative about Ukraine. Instead of being portrayed by others, Ukraine has managed to advance its own strategic narrative—one of a brave, unified, and defiant nation, struggling against an evil empire. We discuss several factors that can explain the successful advent of the new narrative. While peculiarities of global journalistic storytelling contributed to the oversimplified narrative of Ukraine as a divided country before the full-scale invasion, the new narrative has benefited from these inherent features of journalistic coverage as well. Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy has largely relied on effective transmedia storytelling. Embracing the third phase of mediatization, Ukraine has mastered memetic warfare of various formats across different media platforms. The case of Ukraine’s storytelling approach in times of war suggests the need for further exploration of the mechanisms of transmedia storytelling and its implications for public diplomacy research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chaisty, P., and S. Whitefield. 2022. How challenger parties can win big with frozen cleavages: Explaining the landslide victory of the servant of the people party in the 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary elections. Party Politics 28 (1): 115–126.
Bolin, G., & Såhlberg, P. (forthcoming). The management of meaning in turbulent times: Information policy, agency and media in Ukraine. MIT Press.
Horbyk, R. 2020. Road to the stadium. Televised election debates and “non-debates” in Ukraine: Between spectacle and democratic instrument. In Routledge international handbook on electoral debates, ed. J. Juárez-Gámiz, C. Holtz-Bacha, and A. Schroeder, 157–165. NY: Routledge.
Hoskins, A., and B. O’Loughlin. 2015. Arrested war: The third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society 18 (11): 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1068350.
Kulyk, V., Riabchuk, M., Zarembo, K., Fakhurdinova, M., Koval, N., & Zarembo, K. (2020). Iнтepпpeтaцiя pociйcькo-yкpaїнcькoгo кoнфлiктy в зaxiдниx нayкoвиx i eкcпepтнo-aнaлiтичниx пpaцяx [Interpretation of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict in Western Scientific and Expert-Analytical Works]. Kyiv.
Matlock, J.F. Jr. (2000). The nowhere nation. New York Review of Books, February 24, pp. 41–4.
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle. 2017. Introduction. In Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations, ed. A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, 1–22. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Pamment, J. 2014. Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review 40 (1): 50–59.
Rogers, J., and A. Tyushka. 2017. ‘Hacking’ into the West: Russia’s ‘anti-hegemonic’ drive and the strategic narrative offensive. Defence Strategic Communications 2: 35–60.
Sheafer, T., and S.R. Shenhav. 2009. Mediated public diplomacy in a new era of warfare. The Communication Review 12 (3): 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420903124192.
Snow, N., and N.J. Cull, eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. Routledge.
Szostek, J. 2020. What happens to public diplomacy during information war? Critical reflections on the conceptual framing of international communication. International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 2728–2748.
Tsvetkova, N., and D. Rushchin. 2021. Russia’s public diplomacy: From soft power to strategic communication. Journal of Political Marketing 20 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2020.1869845.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Horbyk, R., Orlova, D. Transmedia storytelling and memetic warfare: Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 228–231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00283-1
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00283-1