Skip to main content
Log in

Transmedia storytelling and memetic warfare: Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ukraine has long been perceived internationally as a troubled post-Soviet country with crucial internal divisions. The “cleft” country narrative was dominant across media, expert, and even academic discourses. The 2022 full-scale unprovoked invasion by Russia has led, among other things, to the striking change of narrative about Ukraine. Instead of being portrayed by others, Ukraine has managed to advance its own strategic narrative—one of a brave, unified, and defiant nation, struggling against an evil empire. We discuss several factors that can explain the successful advent of the new narrative. While peculiarities of global journalistic storytelling contributed to the oversimplified narrative of Ukraine as a divided country before the full-scale invasion, the new narrative has benefited from these inherent features of journalistic coverage as well. Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy has largely relied on effective transmedia storytelling. Embracing the third phase of mediatization, Ukraine has mastered memetic warfare of various formats across different media platforms. The case of Ukraine’s storytelling approach in times of war suggests the need for further exploration of the mechanisms of transmedia storytelling and its implications for public diplomacy research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chaisty, P., and S. Whitefield. 2022. How challenger parties can win big with frozen cleavages: Explaining the landslide victory of the servant of the people party in the 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary elections. Party Politics 28 (1): 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, G., & Såhlberg, P. (forthcoming). The management of meaning in turbulent times: Information policy, agency and media in Ukraine. MIT Press.

  • Horbyk, R. 2020. Road to the stadium. Televised election debates and “non-debates” in Ukraine: Between spectacle and democratic instrument. In Routledge international handbook on electoral debates, ed. J. Juárez-Gámiz, C. Holtz-Bacha, and A. Schroeder, 157–165. NY: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, A., and B. O’Loughlin. 2015. Arrested war: The third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society 18 (11): 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1068350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulyk, V., Riabchuk, M., Zarembo, K., Fakhurdinova, M., Koval, N., & Zarembo, K. (2020). Iнтepпpeтaцiя pociйcькo-yкpaїнcькoгo кoнфлiктy в зaxiдниx нayкoвиx i eкcпepтнo-aнaлiтичниx пpaцяx [Interpretation of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict in Western Scientific and Expert-Analytical Works]. Kyiv.

  • Matlock, J.F. Jr. (2000). The nowhere nation. New York Review of Books, February 24, pp. 41–4.

  • Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle. 2017. Introduction. In Forging the world: Strategic narratives and international relations, ed. A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, 1–22. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. 2014. Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review 40 (1): 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., and A. Tyushka. 2017. ‘Hacking’ into the West: Russia’s ‘anti-hegemonic’ drive and the strategic narrative offensive. Defence Strategic Communications 2: 35–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheafer, T., and S.R. Shenhav. 2009. Mediated public diplomacy in a new era of warfare. The Communication Review 12 (3): 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420903124192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, N., and N.J. Cull, eds. 2020. Routledge handbook of public diplomacy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostek, J. 2020. What happens to public diplomacy during information war? Critical reflections on the conceptual framing of international communication. International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 2728–2748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetkova, N., and D. Rushchin. 2021. Russia’s public diplomacy: From soft power to strategic communication. Journal of Political Marketing 20 (1): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2020.1869845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariya Orlova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horbyk, R., Orlova, D. Transmedia storytelling and memetic warfare: Ukraine’s wartime public diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 228–231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00283-1

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00283-1

Keywords

Navigation