Abstract
Density is a key concept in urban research and theory, yet also much confused and abused. A main source of confusion in the analysis of urban densities, is that the spatial scale of measurement has a major impact on the outcome. From the scale of an urban block to that of a metropolitan area, densities can decrease a hundred-fold. Variations in the size of administrative and statistical districts can strongly bias comparative studies. For large metropolitan areas, the conventional average density measure obscures local concentrations, that are relevant for the urban experience, walking and public transport. Addressing these issues, a multi-scalar approach for mapping and measuring density is proposed, that captures concentration patterns in cities at scales relevant to everyday life: the micro-spatial scale of direct sensory experience, the meso-scale of walkable neighbourhoods, and the macro-scale of metropolitan areas. Demonstrating this approach, the Metropolitan Walkable Density (MWD) and the Urban Experiential Density (UED) are mapped and measured for cities in North America, Australia and Europe, based on census data. These multi-scalar approaches capture concentrations at scales that relate to how we access and experience the city. The findings show that lived densities vastly differ from conventional simple averages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2016. Census of Population and Housing. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2074.02016?OpenDocument. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.
Berghauser Pont, M., and P. Haupt. 2010. Spacematrix: Space, Density and Urban Form. Rotterdam: NAi.
Bertaud, A. and S. Malpezzi. 2003 The Spatial Distribution of Population in 48 World Cities: Implications for Economies in Transition. Report.
Bertolini, L. 2017. Planning the Mobile Metropolis: Transport for People, Places and the Planet. London: Palgrave.
Brucks, M. 2012. When Does Density Lead to Crowding? An Empirical Study on Perception and Judgement of Building Density. GAM 08: 152–165.
Calthorpe, P. 2000. The Pedestrian Pocket. In The City Reader, ed. R. Le Gates and F. Stout, 350–356. London: Routledge.
Churchman, A. 1999. Disentangling the Concept of Density. Journal of Planning Literature 13 (4): 389–411.
Cerdá, I. 1859. Teoría de la Construcción de Ciudades. Barcelona: Theory of City Construction.
Craig, J. 1984. Averaging Population Density. Demography 21 (3): 405–412.
DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum.
DeLanda, M. 2016. Parametrising the Social. Architectural Design 86 (2): 124–127.
Dovey, K. 2016. Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. London: Bloomsbury.
Dovey, K., and E. Pafka. 2014. The Urban Density Assemblage: Modelling Multiple Measures. Urban Design International 19 (1): 66–76.
Dovey, K., M. Ristic, and E. Pafka. 2017. Mapping as Spatial Knowledge. In Mapping Urbanities, ed. K. Dovey et al. New York: Routledge.
Eberle, D., and S. Frank. 2012. 19 Theses on Density. GAM 08: 18–23.
European Forum for Geography and Statistics (EFGS). 2011. GRID Data per Country. http://www.efgs.info/data/. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.
Florida, R. 2012. America’s Truly Densest Metros. The Atlantic Cities. 15 October.
Fooks, E. 1946. X-ray the city!. Canberra: Ministry of Post-War Reconstruction.
Forsyth, A. 2003. Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity. Design Brief 9: 2–8.
Forsyth, A. 2015. What is a Walkable Place? The Walkability Debate in Urban Design. Urban Design International 20 (4): 274–292.
Gehl, J. 1987. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gruen, V. 1973. Centers for the Urban Environment. Survival of the Cities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Howard, E. 1965. Garden Cities of To-Morrow. London: Faber and Faber.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Jacobs, A., and D. Appleyard. 1987. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 112–120.
Kärrholm, M. 2019. Scale Alignment: On the Role of Material Culture for Urban Design. Urban Design International 24 (1): 7–15.
Lampugnani, V.M., T.K. Keller, and B. Buser. 2007. Städtische Dichte: Urbanisierungsstrategien für die Schweiz. Zürich: Nzz Libro.
Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mees, P. 2009. Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age. London: Earthscan.
Newman, P., T. Beatley, and H. Boyer. 2009. Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington DC: Island Press.
Newman, P., and J.R. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower: Aldershot.
Pafka, E. 2013. Nothing Gained by only Counting Dwellings per Hectare: A Hundred Years of Confusing Urban Densities, in State of Australian Cities Conference, 26–29 November, Sydney.
Patel, S.B. 2013. Life between Buildings: The Use and Abuse of FSI. Economic & Political Weekly 48 (6): 68–74.
Rapoport, A. 1975. Toward a Redefinition of Density. Environment and Behavior 7 (2): 133–158.
Richardson, A.J., P.J. Brunton, and S.M. Roddis. 1998. The Calculation of Perceived Residential Density. Road & Transport Research 7 (2): 3–15.
Sieverts, T. 2003. Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. New York: Spon Press.
Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Soria y Puig, A. 1999. Cerdá: The Five Bases of the General Theory of Urbanization. Madrid: Electa.
Statistics Canada. 2016. Census. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.
Stevens, Q. 2016. Creative Milieux: How Urban Design Nurtures Creative Clusters. London: Routledge.
Unwin, R. 1912. Nothing Gained by Overcrowding! How the Garden City type of Development May Benefit Both Owner and Occupier. Westminster: P.S. King & Son.
US Census Bureau. 2010. Census. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade.2010.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.
Wilson, S.G., D.A. Plane, P.J. Mackun, T.R. Fischetti, and J. Goworowska. 2012. Patterns of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Population Change: 2000 to 2010. Suitland: US Census Bureau.
Acknowledgements
This research has been funded by an ECR Grant awarded by the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning of the University of Melbourne. I thank Ran Pan and Fujie Rao for the spatial and statistical analysis presented in this paper. Also thank Fujie Rao and Kim Dovey for their insightful critiques of earlier versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pafka, E. Multi-scalar urban densities: from the metropolitan to the street level. Urban Des Int 27, 53–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y