Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-scalar urban densities: from the metropolitan to the street level

  • Original Article
  • Published:
URBAN DESIGN International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Density is a key concept in urban research and theory, yet also much confused and abused. A main source of confusion in the analysis of urban densities, is that the spatial scale of measurement has a major impact on the outcome. From the scale of an urban block to that of a metropolitan area, densities can decrease a hundred-fold. Variations in the size of administrative and statistical districts can strongly bias comparative studies. For large metropolitan areas, the conventional average density measure obscures local concentrations, that are relevant for the urban experience, walking and public transport. Addressing these issues, a multi-scalar approach for mapping and measuring density is proposed, that captures concentration patterns in cities at scales relevant to everyday life: the micro-spatial scale of direct sensory experience, the meso-scale of walkable neighbourhoods, and the macro-scale of metropolitan areas. Demonstrating this approach, the Metropolitan Walkable Density (MWD) and the Urban Experiential Density (UED) are mapped and measured for cities in North America, Australia and Europe, based on census data. These multi-scalar approaches capture concentrations at scales that relate to how we access and experience the city. The findings show that lived densities vastly differ from conventional simple averages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2016. Census of Population and Housing. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2074.02016?OpenDocument. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.

  • Berghauser Pont, M., and P. Haupt. 2010. Spacematrix: Space, Density and Urban Form. Rotterdam: NAi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A. and S. Malpezzi. 2003 The Spatial Distribution of Population in 48 World Cities: Implications for Economies in Transition. Report.

  • Bertolini, L. 2017. Planning the Mobile Metropolis: Transport for People, Places and the Planet. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brucks, M. 2012. When Does Density Lead to Crowding? An Empirical Study on Perception and Judgement of Building Density. GAM 08: 152–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calthorpe, P. 2000. The Pedestrian Pocket. In The City Reader, ed. R. Le Gates and F. Stout, 350–356. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A. 1999. Disentangling the Concept of Density. Journal of Planning Literature 13 (4): 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerdá, I. 1859. Teoría de la Construcción de Ciudades. Barcelona: Theory of City Construction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, J. 1984. Averaging Population Density. Demography 21 (3): 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. 2016. Parametrising the Social. Architectural Design 86 (2): 124–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. 2016. Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., and E. Pafka. 2014. The Urban Density Assemblage: Modelling Multiple Measures. Urban Design International 19 (1): 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K., M. Ristic, and E. Pafka. 2017. Mapping as Spatial Knowledge. In Mapping Urbanities, ed. K. Dovey et al. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, D., and S. Frank. 2012. 19 Theses on Density. GAM 08: 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Forum for Geography and Statistics (EFGS). 2011. GRID Data per Country. http://www.efgs.info/data/. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.

  • Florida, R. 2012. America’s Truly Densest Metros. The Atlantic Cities. 15 October.

  • Fooks, E. 1946. X-ray the city!. Canberra: Ministry of Post-War Reconstruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. 2003. Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity. Design Brief 9: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A. 2015. What is a Walkable Place? The Walkability Debate in Urban Design. Urban Design International 20 (4): 274–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, J. 1987. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, V. 1973. Centers for the Urban Environment. Survival of the Cities. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. 1965. Garden Cities of To-Morrow. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., and D. Appleyard. 1987. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 112–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kärrholm, M. 2019. Scale Alignment: On the Role of Material Culture for Urban Design. Urban Design International 24 (1): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampugnani, V.M., T.K. Keller, and B. Buser. 2007. Städtische Dichte: Urbanisierungsstrategien für die Schweiz. Zürich: Nzz Libro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mees, P. 2009. Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., T. Beatley, and H. Boyer. 2009. Resilient Cities: Responding to Peak Oil and Climate Change. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., and J.R. Kenworthy. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence: An International Sourcebook. Gower: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafka, E. 2013. Nothing Gained by only Counting Dwellings per Hectare: A Hundred Years of Confusing Urban Densities, in State of Australian Cities Conference, 26–29 November, Sydney.

  • Patel, S.B. 2013. Life between Buildings: The Use and Abuse of FSI. Economic & Political Weekly 48 (6): 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. 1975. Toward a Redefinition of Density. Environment and Behavior 7 (2): 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A.J., P.J. Brunton, and S.M. Roddis. 1998. The Calculation of Perceived Residential Density. Road & Transport Research 7 (2): 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts, T. 2003. Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. New York: Spon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. 2000. Postmetropolis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soria y Puig, A. 1999. Cerdá: The Five Bases of the General Theory of Urbanization. Madrid: Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. 2016. Census. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.

  • Stevens, Q. 2016. Creative Milieux: How Urban Design Nurtures Creative Clusters. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, R. 1912. Nothing Gained by Overcrowding! How the Garden City type of Development May Benefit Both Owner and Occupier. Westminster: P.S. King & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 2010. Census. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census/decade.2010.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2018.

  • Wilson, S.G., D.A. Plane, P.J. Mackun, T.R. Fischetti, and J. Goworowska. 2012. Patterns of Metropolitan and Micropolitan Population Change: 2000 to 2010. Suitland: US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been funded by an ECR Grant awarded by the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning of the University of Melbourne. I thank Ran Pan and Fujie Rao for the spatial and statistical analysis presented in this paper. Also thank Fujie Rao and Kim Dovey for their insightful critiques of earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elek Pafka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pafka, E. Multi-scalar urban densities: from the metropolitan to the street level. Urban Des Int 27, 53–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00112-y

Keywords

Navigation