Abstract
This study aimed to examine role of fonts as a vehicle in linking identity to perception of selected brands. Fonts are crucial constituent in the entire gamut of visual communication of brands. They communicate a brands’ identity through two means: explicit and implicit. Explicit aspect consists of physical dimensions such as weight, contrast, stress, x-height etc. Implicit aspect implies semiotics exuded by fonts formed at sub-conscious level and vary with change in identity a brand intends to communicate. The examination of symbiotic relationship connecting specific dimensions of font evaluated on basis of their ability to make text more readable and attractive with specific semiotics and how does such association vary with brand identity was the main focus of this study. This was achieved by conducting two experiments. Secondly, influence of explicit and implicit means of communication on linking identity with perception was examined through mediation analysis. Results showed direct effect of explicit aspect to be significantly reduced with inclusion of semiotic impact emphasizing importance of their congruency. Such inference is important in logo design, as it indicated that a brand communicating a message should use font with specific dimensions reflecting particular semiotics so as to influence customers’ perception of brand favourably.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173.
Black, Ken. 2011. Business statistics: for contemporary decision making. New York: Wiley.
Brumberger, Eva R. 2003. The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication 50 (2): 206–223.
Childers, Terry L., and Jeffrey Jass. 2002. All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12 (2): 93–106.
Chung, A., and D. Kinsey. 2019. An examination of consumers’ subjective views that affect the favorability of organizational logos: An exploratory study using Q methodology. Corporate Reputation Review 22: 89–100.
Churchill, G.A., and D. Iacobucci. 2006. Marketing research: Methodological foundations. New York: Dryden Press.
Danesi, M. 2013. Semiotizing a product into a brand. Social Semiotics 23 (4): 464–476.
Da Silveira, C., C. Lages, and C. Simoes. 2013. Reconceptualizing brand identity in a dynamic environment. Journal of Business Research 66 (1): 28–36.
Deng, X., and L. Wang. 2020. The impact of semantic fluency on consumers’ aesthetic evaluation in graphic designs with text. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science 3 (3): 433–446.
Doyle, J.R., and P.A. Bottomley. 2004. Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research 57 (8): 873–880.
Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Foroudi, P., T.C. Melewar, and S. Gupta. 2014. Linking corporate logo, corporate image, and reputation: An examination of consumer perceptions in the financial setting. Journal of Business Research 67 (11): 2269–2281.
Foroudi, P. 2019. Influence of brand signature, brand awareness, brand attitude, brand reputation on hotel industry’s brand performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management 76: 271–285.
Grohmann, B. 2009. Gender dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (2): 105–119.
Grohmann, B., J.L. Giese, and I.D. Parkman. 2013. Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands. Journal of Brand Management 20 (5): 389–403.
Grohmann, B. 2016. Communicating brand gender through type fonts. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (4): 403–418.
Hayes, Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.
Henderson, P.W., J.L. Giese, and J.A. Cote. 2004. Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 60–72.
Hwang, J., and J. Kandampully. 2012. The role of emotional aspects in younger consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Product and Brand Management 21 (2): 98–108.
Japutra, A., S. Molinillo, and S. Wang. 2018. Aesthetic or self-expressiveness? Linking brand logo benefits, brand stereotypes and relationship quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44 (9): 191–200.
Jin, C., M. Yoon, and J. Lee. 2019. The influence of brand color identity on brand association and loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management 28 (1): 50–62.
Josephson, S. 2008. Keeping your readers’ eyes on the screen: An eye-tracking study comparing sans serif and serif typefaces. Visual Communication Quarterly 15 (1–2): 67–79.
Kelly, M. 2017. Analysing the complex relationship between logo and brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 13 (1): 18–33.
Kim, H., A.R. Rao, and A.Y. Lee. 2009. It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (6): 877–889.
Koll, O., and S. Von Wallpach. 2009. One brand perception? Or many? The heterogeneity of intra-brand knowledge. Journal of Product & Brand Management 8: 338–345.
Luna, K., M. Nogueira, and P.B. Albuquerque. 2019. Words in larger font are perceived as more important: Explaining the belief that font size affects memory. Memory 27 (4): 555–560.
McCarthy, M.S., and D.L. Mothersbaugh. 2002. Effects of typographic factors in advertising-based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests. Psychology and Marketing 19 (7–8): 663–691.
Mead, J.A., R. Richerson, and W. Li. 2020. Dynamic right-slanted fonts increase the effectiveness of promotional retail advertising. Journal of Retailing 96 (2): 282–296.
Mikaere, E. J. 2011. How Favourable Attitudes are Formed when the Semantic Associations of a Logotype are Congruent with Brand Personality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).
Moret-Tatay, C., and M. Perea. 2011. Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23 (5): 619–624.
Nandan, S. 2005. An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective. Journal of Brand Management 12 (4): 264–278.
Norgaard, N. 2009. The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach. Orbis Litterarum 64 (2): 141–160.
Oosterhout, L. 2013. Word marks: a helpful tool to express your identity: an empirical study regarding fonts of word marks as a tool for transmitting an archetypal identity (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning (No. 47). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Perez-Sobrino, P., J. Littlemore, and D. Houghton. 2019. The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics 40 (6): 957–991.
Poffenberger, A.T., and R.B. Franken. 1923. A study of the appropriateness of typefaces. Journal of Applied Psychology 7 (4): 312.
Price, J., K. McElroy, and N.J. Martin. 2016. The role of font size and font style in younger and older adults’ predicted and actual recall performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 23 (3): 366–388.
Saltz, I. 2019. Typography Essentials Revised and Updated: 100 Design Principles for Working with Type. New York: Rockport Publishers.
Schroll, R., B. Schnurr, and D. Grewal. 2018. Humanizing products with handwritten typefaces. Journal of Consumer Research 45 (3): 648–672.
Singla, V., and G. Gupta. 2019. Emotional branding scale and its role in formation of brand trust. Paradigm 23 (2): 148–163.
Skaggs, S. 2020. The semiotics of visual identity: Logos. The American Journal of Semiotics 35 (3/4): 277–307.
Van Grinsven, B., and E. Das. 2016. Logo design in marketing communications: Brand logo complexity moderates exposure effects on brand recognition and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (3): 256–270.
Veg-Sala, N., and E. Roux. 2018. Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Brand Management 25 (1): 436–448.
Velasco, C., and C. Spence. 2019. The Role of Typeface in Packaging Design. In Multisensory Packaging, ed. C. Velasco and C. Spence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Xu, X., R. Chen, and M.W. Liu. 2017. The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions. Marketing Letters 28 (3): 449–460.
Zaichkowsky, J.L. 2010. Strategies for distinctive brands. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 548–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singla, V., Sharma, N. Understanding Role of Fonts in Linking Brand Identity to Brand Perception. Corp Reputation Rev 25, 272–286 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00127-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00127-3