Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Role of Fonts in Linking Brand Identity to Brand Perception

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to examine role of fonts as a vehicle in linking identity to perception of selected brands. Fonts are crucial constituent in the entire gamut of visual communication of brands. They communicate a brands’ identity through two means: explicit and implicit. Explicit aspect consists of physical dimensions such as weight, contrast, stress, x-height etc. Implicit aspect implies semiotics exuded by fonts formed at sub-conscious level and vary with change in identity a brand intends to communicate. The examination of symbiotic relationship connecting specific dimensions of font evaluated on basis of their ability to make text more readable and attractive with specific semiotics and how does such association vary with brand identity was the main focus of this study. This was achieved by conducting two experiments. Secondly, influence of explicit and implicit means of communication on linking identity with perception was examined through mediation analysis. Results showed direct effect of explicit aspect to be significantly reduced with inclusion of semiotic impact emphasizing importance of their congruency. Such inference is important in logo design, as it indicated that a brand communicating a message should use font with specific dimensions reflecting particular semiotics so as to influence customers’ perception of brand favourably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, Ken. 2011. Business statistics: for contemporary decision making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumberger, Eva R. 2003. The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication 50 (2): 206–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers, Terry L., and Jeffrey Jass. 2002. All dressed up with something to say: Effects of typeface semantic associations on brand perceptions and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12 (2): 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, A., and D. Kinsey. 2019. An examination of consumers’ subjective views that affect the favorability of organizational logos: An exploratory study using Q methodology. Corporate Reputation Review 22: 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.A., and D. Iacobucci. 2006. Marketing research: Methodological foundations. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. 2013. Semiotizing a product into a brand. Social Semiotics 23 (4): 464–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silveira, C., C. Lages, and C. Simoes. 2013. Reconceptualizing brand identity in a dynamic environment. Journal of Business Research 66 (1): 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., and L. Wang. 2020. The impact of semantic fluency on consumers’ aesthetic evaluation in graphic designs with text. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science 3 (3): 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J.R., and P.A. Bottomley. 2004. Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research 57 (8): 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Andy. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foroudi, P., T.C. Melewar, and S. Gupta. 2014. Linking corporate logo, corporate image, and reputation: An examination of consumer perceptions in the financial setting. Journal of Business Research 67 (11): 2269–2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroudi, P. 2019. Influence of brand signature, brand awareness, brand attitude, brand reputation on hotel industry’s brand performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management 76: 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, B. 2009. Gender dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (2): 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, B., J.L. Giese, and I.D. Parkman. 2013. Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands. Journal of Brand Management 20 (5): 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann, B. 2016. Communicating brand gender through type fonts. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (4): 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Andrew F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P.W., J.L. Giese, and J.A. Cote. 2004. Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 60–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., and J. Kandampully. 2012. The role of emotional aspects in younger consumer-brand relationships. Journal of Product and Brand Management 21 (2): 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japutra, A., S. Molinillo, and S. Wang. 2018. Aesthetic or self-expressiveness? Linking brand logo benefits, brand stereotypes and relationship quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44 (9): 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, C., M. Yoon, and J. Lee. 2019. The influence of brand color identity on brand association and loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management 28 (1): 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, S. 2008. Keeping your readers’ eyes on the screen: An eye-tracking study comparing sans serif and serif typefaces. Visual Communication Quarterly 15 (1–2): 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. 2017. Analysing the complex relationship between logo and brand. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 13 (1): 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., A.R. Rao, and A.Y. Lee. 2009. It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (6): 877–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koll, O., and S. Von Wallpach. 2009. One brand perception? Or many? The heterogeneity of intra-brand knowledge. Journal of Product & Brand Management 8: 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luna, K., M. Nogueira, and P.B. Albuquerque. 2019. Words in larger font are perceived as more important: Explaining the belief that font size affects memory. Memory 27 (4): 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M.S., and D.L. Mothersbaugh. 2002. Effects of typographic factors in advertising-based persuasion: A general model and initial empirical tests. Psychology and Marketing 19 (7–8): 663–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, J.A., R. Richerson, and W. Li. 2020. Dynamic right-slanted fonts increase the effectiveness of promotional retail advertising. Journal of Retailing 96 (2): 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikaere, E. J. 2011. How Favourable Attitudes are Formed when the Semantic Associations of a Logotype are Congruent with Brand Personality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato).

  • Moret-Tatay, C., and M. Perea. 2011. Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23 (5): 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandan, S. 2005. An exploration of the brand identity–brand image linkage: A communications perspective. Journal of Brand Management 12 (4): 264–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, N. 2009. The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach. Orbis Litterarum 64 (2): 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhout, L. 2013. Word marks: a helpful tool to express your identity: an empirical study regarding fonts of word marks as a tool for transmitting an archetypal identity (Master's thesis, University of Twente).

  • Osgood, C.E., G.J. Suci, and P.H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The measurement of meaning (No. 47). Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Sobrino, P., J. Littlemore, and D. Houghton. 2019. The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics 40 (6): 957–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, A.T., and R.B. Franken. 1923. A study of the appropriateness of typefaces. Journal of Applied Psychology 7 (4): 312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J., K. McElroy, and N.J. Martin. 2016. The role of font size and font style in younger and older adults’ predicted and actual recall performance. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 23 (3): 366–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, I. 2019. Typography Essentials Revised and Updated: 100 Design Principles for Working with Type. New York: Rockport Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroll, R., B. Schnurr, and D. Grewal. 2018. Humanizing products with handwritten typefaces. Journal of Consumer Research 45 (3): 648–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singla, V., and G. Gupta. 2019. Emotional branding scale and its role in formation of brand trust. Paradigm 23 (2): 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs, S. 2020. The semiotics of visual identity: Logos. The American Journal of Semiotics 35 (3/4): 277–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Grinsven, B., and E. Das. 2016. Logo design in marketing communications: Brand logo complexity moderates exposure effects on brand recognition and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications 22 (3): 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veg-Sala, N., and E. Roux. 2018. Cross-gender extension potential of luxury brands: A semiotic analysis. Journal of Brand Management 25 (1): 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, C., and C. Spence. 2019. The Role of Typeface in Packaging Design. In Multisensory Packaging, ed. C. Velasco and C. Spence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., R. Chen, and M.W. Liu. 2017. The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions. Marketing Letters 28 (3): 449–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky, J.L. 2010. Strategies for distinctive brands. Journal of Brand Management 17 (8): 548–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikas Singla.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singla, V., Sharma, N. Understanding Role of Fonts in Linking Brand Identity to Brand Perception. Corp Reputation Rev 25, 272–286 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00127-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00127-3

Keywords

Navigation