Abstract
In a provocative paper Marshall (2012) suggests that a range of seminal urban design theories stemming from the 1960s – Jacobs, Alexander, Lynch and Cullen – can be construed as pseudo-science because they have not been tested empirically. Adding Sitte and Cerdá, we take this provocation as a chance to raise some questions about the nature of urban design knowledge, theory and practice. We suggest that this work is not and cannot be empirical science but is based in the detailed observation of cities using multiple logics. While there is an emerging science of cities, urban design knowledge is much broader, spanning both natural and social sciences as well as the arts and humanities. We also argue that it is a particular form of diagrammatic socio-spatial knowledge that cannot be reduced to either words or numbers. These thinkers remain seminal more for the questions they open than the answers they provide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Alexander, C. (1965) A city is not a tree. Architectural Forum (172 April/May).
Alexander, C. (1966) The city as a mechanism for sustaining human contact, Research report, Center for Planning and Development Research. Berkeley: University of California.
Alexander, C. (1979) The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C. (1987) A New Theory of Urban Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. (1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnheim, R. (1954) Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of The Creative Eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Ashby, W.R. (1960) Design for a Brain: The Origin of Adaptive Behaviour. New York: Wiley.
Barcelona City Council. (2010) Cerda and the Barcelona of the Future. Reality Versus Project. Barcelona, Spain: Barcelona City Council.
Batty, M. (2013) The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baumeister, R. (1876) Stadt-erweiterungen in technischer, baupolizeilicher und wirtschaftlicher Beziehung. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Korn.
Bettencourt, L.M.A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C. and West, G.B. (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104 (17): 7301–7306.
Brillembourg, A. and Klumpner, H. (2005) The Informal City. Munich, Germany: Prestel.
Cerdá, I. (1867) Teoria General de la Urbanizacion. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta Española.
Choay, F. (1997) The Rule and the Model: On the Theory of Architecture and Urbanism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, S. and Sherrod, D.R. (1978) When density matters: Environmental control as a determinant of crowding effects in laboratory and residential settings. Journal of Population 1 (3): 189–202.
Collins, G.R. and Collins, C.C. (1965) Camillo Sitte and the Birth of Modern City Planning. New York: Random House.
Cullen, G. (1961) Townscape. London: Architectural Press.
Cullen, G. (1991) Townscape. Das Vokabular der Stadt. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
DeLanda, M. (2011) Philosophy and Simulation. London: Continuum.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press.
Douven, I. (2011) Abduction. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/.
Dovey, K. and Pafka, E. (2014) The Urban Density Assemblage. Urban Design International 19 (1): 66–76.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
Frow, J. (2005) Theory. In: T. Bennett, L. Grossberg and M. Morris (eds.) New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Malden, MA: Blackwel.
Gombrich, E.H. (1960) Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon.
Goodey, B. (1982) Cut down to size? Christopher Alexander’s ‘a city is not a tree’. Built Environment 8 (4): 258–261.
Gosling, D. (1996) Gordon Cullen: Visions of Urban Design. London: Academy Editions.
Gunderson, L.H. and Holling, C.S. (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington DC: Island Press.
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hoek, J.W.van den (2008) The MXI (mixed-use index) as tool for urban planning and analysis. Paper presented at the Corporations and Cities: Envisioning Corporate Real Estate in the Urban Future, Delft University of Technology.
Isaacs, R. (2000) The urban picturesque: An aesthetic experience of urban pedestrian places. Journal of Urban Design 5 (2): 145–180.
Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
Kepes, G. (1944) Language of Vision. Chicago, IL: Paul Theobald.
Lampugnani, V.M. (2012) Gedächtnis und kritische Wissenschaft – Für eine Neugründung der Disziplin Städtebau. Geographische Revue 14 (1): 53–57.
Larice, M. and Macdonald, E. (eds.) (2013) Editors’ introduction to the concise townscape. In: The Urban Design Reader. New york: Routledge, pp. 118–119.
Lefebvre, H. (2004) Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.
Ley, K. (2007) Die Intellektualisierung des Städtebaus in Deutschland: Schriften zum Städtebau und das Entstehen einer wissenschaftlichen Disziplin im späten 19. Jahrhundert. RWTH Aachen.
Lynch, K. (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Macarthur, J. (2007) The Picturesque: Architecture, Disgust and Other Irregularities. London: Routledge.
Marshall, S. (2009) Cities, Design & Evolution. London: Routledge.
Marshall, S. (2012) Science, pseudo-science and urban design. Urban Design International 17 (4): 257–271.
Mehaffy, M.W. (2008) Generative methods in urban design: A progress assessment. Journal of Urbanism 1 (1): 57–75.
Mitchell, R.E. (1971) Some social implications of high density housing. American Sociological Review 36 (1): 18–29.
Nes, A., Berghauser Pont, M. and Mashhoodi, B. (2012) Combination of space syntax with spacematrix and the mixed use index. The Rotterdam South test case. Paper presented at the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile.
Rapoport, A. (1990) History and Precedent in Environmental Design. New York: Plenum Press.
Rapoport, A. and Kantor, R.E. (1967) Complexity and ambiguity in environmental design. AIP Journal 33 (4): 210–221.
Schmidt, C.G. (1977) Influence of land use diversity upon neighbourhood success: An analysis of Jacobs’ theory. Annals of Regional Science 11 (1): 53–65.
Serratosa, A. (1999) Foreword. In: A. Soria y Puig (ed.) Cerdá: The Five Bases of the General Theory of Urbanization. Madrid, Spain: Electa, pp. 13–19.
Shelton, B. (2012) Learning from the Japanese City: Looking East in Urban Design. London: Routledge.
Sitte, C. (1889) Der Städtebau nach seinen künstlerischen Grundsätzen. Vienna, Austria: Graeser.
Soria y Puig, A. (ed.) (1999) Cerdá: The Five Bases of the General Theory of Urbanization. Madrid, Spain: Electa.
Stübben, J. (1890) Der Städtebau. Darmstadt, Germany: Bergstrasser.
Walker, B.H. and Salt, D. (2006) Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in A Changing World. Washington DC: Island Press.
Weicher, J.C. (1973) A test of Jane Jacobs’ theory of successful neighbourhoods. Journal of Regional Science 13 (1): 29–40.
Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics, or, Control and Communication in the Animal and The Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wilhelm, K. (2006) Ordnungsmuster der Stadt. Camillo Sitte und der moderne Städtebaudiskurs. In: K. Wilhelm and D. Jessen-Klingenberg (eds.) Formationen der Stadt: Camillo Sitte weitergelesen. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, pp. 15–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dovey, K., Pafka, E. The science of urban design?. Urban Des Int 21, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.28
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2015.28