Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term fertilization regimes affect bacterial community structure and diversity of an agricultural soil in northern China

  • Soil Chemistry and Biochemistry; Soil Microbiology (Subject Editor: Chengrong Chen)
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Aims, and Scope

Knowledge about shifts of microbial community structure and diversity following different agricultural management practices could improve our understanding of soil processes and thus help us to develop sound management strategies. A long-term fertilization experiment was established in 1989 at Fengqiu (35°00′N, 114°24′E) in northern China. The soil (sandy loam) is classified as aquic inceptisols and has received continuous fertilization treatments since then. The fertilization treatments included control (CK, no fertilizer), chemical fertilizers nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) (NK), phosphorous (P) and K (PK), NP, NPK, organic manure (OM), and half chemical fertilizers NPK plus half organic manure (1/2NPKOM). The objective of this study was to examine if the microbial community structure and diversity were affected by the long-term fertilization regimes.

Materials and Methods

Soil samples were collected from the long-term experimental plots with seven treatments and four replications in April 2006. Microbial DNAs were extracted from the soil samples and the 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified. The PCR products were analyzed by DGGE, cloning and sequencing. The bacterial community structures and diversity were assessed using the DGGE profiles and the clone libraries constructed from the excised DGGE bands.

Results

The bacterial community structure of the OM and PK treatments were significantly different from those of all other treatments. The bacterial community structures of the four Ncontaining treatments (NK, NP, NPK and 1/2NPKOM), as well as CK, were more similar to each other. The changes in bacterial community structures of the OM and PK treatments showed higher richness and diversity. Phylogenetic analyses indicated that Proteobacteria (30.5%) was the dominant taxonomic group of the soil, followed by Acidobacteria (15.3%), Gemmatimonadetes (12.7%), etc.

Discussion

Irrespective of the two fertilization treatments of OM and PK, the cluster analysis showed that bacterial communities of the remaining five treatments of CK, NK, NP, NPK and 1/2NPKOM seemed to be more similar to each other, which indicated the relatively weak effects of the four N-containing treatments on soil bacterial communities. N fertilizer may be considered as a key factor to counteract the effects of other fertilizers on microbial communities.

Conclusions

Our results show that long-term fertilization regimes can affect bacterial community structure and diversity of the agricultural soil. The OM and PK treatments showed a trend towards distinct community structures, higher richness and diversity when compared to the other treatments. Contrasting to the positive effects of OM and PK treatments on the bacterial communities, N fertilizer could be considered as a key factor in the soil to counteract the effects of other fertilizers on soil microbial communities.

Recommendations and Perspectives

Because of the extremely high abundance and diversity of microorganisms in soil and the high heterogeneity of the soil, it is necessary to further examine the effects of fertilization regimes on microbial community and diversity in different type soils for comprehensively understanding their effects through the appropriate combination of molecular approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell T, Newman JA, Silverman BW, Turner SL, Lilley AK (2005): The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature 436, 1157–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jouseau C (2006): Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443, 989–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AL, Paixão SM, Caçador I, Carolino M (2007): CLPP and EEA profiles of microbial communities in salt marsh sediments. J Soils Sediments 7(6) 418–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crecchio C, Gelsomino A, Ambrosoli R, Minati JL, Ruggiero P (2004): Functional and molecular responses of soil microbial communities under differing soil management practices. Soil Biol Biochem 36, 1873–1883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel R (2005): The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Micro 3, 470–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dolfing J, Vos A, Bloem J, Ehlert PAI, Naumova NB, Kuikman PJ (2004): Microbial diversity in archived soils. Science 306, 813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enwall K, Philippot L, Hallin S (2005): Activity and composition of the denitrifying bacterial community respond differently to long-term fertilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 8335–8343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989): PHYLIP — phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006): The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 626–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freitag TE, Chang L, Clegg CD, Prosser JI (2005): Influence of inorganic nitrogen management regime on the diversity of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in agricultural grassland soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 8323–8334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gans J, Wolinsky M, Dunbar J (2005): Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309, 1387–1390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsomino A, Cacco G (2006): Compositional shifts of bacterial groups in a solarized and amended soil as determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Soil Biol Biochem 38, 91–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He JZ, Xu ZH, Hughes J (2005): Analyses of soil fungal communities in adjacent natural forest and hoop pine plantation ecosystems of subtropical Australia using molecular approaches based on 18S rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 247, 91–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He JZ, Xu ZH, Hughes J (2006): Molecular bacterial diversity of a forest soil under residue management regimes in subtropical Australia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55, 38–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He JZ, Shen JP, Zhang LM, Zhu YG, Zheng YM, Xu MG, Di HJ (2007): Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices. Environ Microbiol 9, 2364–2374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, Bohannan BJM (2001): Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 4399–4406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PH (2006): Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 1719–1728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knief C, Vanitchung S, Harvey NW, Conrad R, Dunfield PF, Chidthaisong A (2005): Diversity of methanotrophic bacteria in tropical upland soils under different land uses. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 3826–3831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004): MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5, 150–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino A, Knapp BA, Moscatelli MC, De Angelis P, Grego S, Insam H (2007): Structural and functional diversity of soil microbes is affected by elevated [CO2] and N addition in a poplar plantation. J Soils Sediments 7(6) 399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mäeder P, Fließach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002): Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296, 1694–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, de Waal E, Uitterlinden A (1993): Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59, 695–700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Li S (1997): Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock AD, Mullen MD, Ringelberg DB, Tyler DD, Hedrick DB, Gale PM, White DC (2001): Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications. Soil Biol Biochem 33, 1011–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarathchandra SU, Ghani A, Yeates GW, Burch G, Cox NR (2001): Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33, 953–964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Handelsman J (2005): Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 1501–1506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sessitsch A, Weilharter A, Gerzabek MH, Kirchmann H, Kandeler E (2001): Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 4215–4224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun HY, Deng SP, Raun WR (2004): Bacterial community structure and diversity in a century-old manure-treated agroecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 5868–5874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tolli J, King GM (2005): Diversity and structure of bacterial chemolithotrophic communities in pine forest and agroecosystem soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 8411–8418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Salte K, Sørheim R, Goksøyr J (1990): Comparison of phenotypic diversity and DNA heterogeneity in a population of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56, 776–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Daae FL, Sandaa R-A, Øvreås L (1998): Novel techniques for analysing microbial diversity in natural and perturbed environments. J Biotechnol 64, 53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Morrison M (2004): Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 4800–4806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Xia B, Treves DS, Wu LY, Marsh TL, O’Neill RV, Palumbo AV, Tiedje JM (2002): Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 326–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-zheng He.

Additional information

ESS-Submission Editor: Chengrong Chen, PhD (c.chen@griffith.edu.au)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ge, Y., Zhang, Jb., Zhang, Lm. et al. Long-term fertilization regimes affect bacterial community structure and diversity of an agricultural soil in northern China. J Soils Sediments 8, 43–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.01.270

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.01.270

Keywords

Navigation