Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating development options for a rain-fed dairy farm in Gippsland

D. P. Armstrong A , K. A. Tarrant A D , C. K. M. Ho B , L. R. Malcolm C and W. J. Wales A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, Ellinbank Centre, 1301 Hazeldean Road, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

B Department of Primary Industries, Tatura Centre, Private Bag 1, Ferguson Road, Tatura, Vic. 3616, Australia.

C Melbourne School of Land and Environment, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: katherine.tarrant@dpi.vic.gov.au

Animal Production Science 50(6) 363-370 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10009
Submitted: 11 January 2010  Accepted: 14 April 2010   Published: 11 June 2010

Abstract

A case study and modelling approach was used to examine options for a dairy farm in the high rainfall area of Gippsland (southern Victoria) that would enable it to maintain or increase profit in the future (next 5–10 years) in the face of a continuing ‘cost-price squeeze’. The economic performance of the business under a range of development options, identified by an ‘expert panel’, was analysed for a planning period of 10 years. The options analysed were: (i) increased herd size without purchasing more land, (ii) increased milking area and (iii) purchasing non-milking area for production of conserved fodder. Expanding the milking area by purchasing more land without significantly increasing herd size (reducing stocking rate from 2.5 to 2.1 cows/ha) increased annual operating profit without increasing variability in profit between years compared with the base farm. The increased profit resulted from a reduction in the amount of purchased feed. The purchase of an additional outblock for fodder production reduced risk compared with the base farm system, but did not improve the profitability of the farm system. Other options significantly reduced profit while increasing risk. The most appropriate changes to dairy farm businesses in response to changes in the operating environment will vary from farm to farm. The analysis suggested that there may be an alternate path to the historical trends of larger and more intensive operations. It has also highlighted the importance of home-grown feed and efficient supplement use to increase or maintain profitability in the medium term.

Additional keywords: case study, dairy business, farming systems, modelling, profitability.


Acknowledgements

We thank the case study farm family for their cooperation and willingness to participate in the study. We acknowledge the valuable input of John Mulvany and the interest, time and effort afforded to the project by the members of the project steering group: Illona Kingston, Bernhard Lubitz, Paul Myers, Graeme Nicoll, John Versteden, Neil Walker and Hans van Wees. We also acknowledge Peter Doyle for commenting on this paper. This work was supported by funding from Dairy Australia, GippsDairy and the Department of Primary Industries, Victoria.


References


AgChallenge (2000) ‘Gippsland agribusiness audit reports and findings.’ August 2000 . Gippsland Agribusiness Forum. Available at http://www.gippslandagribusiness.com.au/library/Audit/audit_appendix_b.pdf [Verified 7 May 2010]

Armstrong D, Knee J, Doyle P, Pritchard K, Gyles O (2000) Water-use efficiency on irrigated dairy farms in northern Victoria and southern New South Wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 643–653.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 7 May 2010]

Valentine S, Lewis P, Cowan RT, DeFaveri J (2009) The effects of high stocking rates on milk production from dryland and irrigated Mediterranean pastures. Animal Production Science 49, 100–111.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Verified 25 April 2010]

VDIA (2000) ‘Dairy farm survey report.’ (Victorian Dairy Industry Authority: Abbotsford, Victoria)