Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > CP > AR06159
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(2)

Effect of second pond dairy effluent applied in spring to silage regrowth of perennial ryegrass based pasture in southern Australia. 1. Dry matter yield and botanical composition changes

J. L. Jacobs A B and G. N. Ward A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Primary Industries, 78 Henna Street, Warrnambool, Vic. 3280, Australia.

B Email: joe.jacobs@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(2) 137-143 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06159
Submitted: 12 May 2006  Accepted: 3 November 2006   Published: 22 February 2007

Abstract

In southern Australia the standard treatment system for dairy shed effluent is a 2-pond system. Effluent from the dairy is first treated in a deep anaerobic pond where sedimentation and breakdown of organic matter occur. Treated liquid effluent then enters a shallow aerobic pond where it is stored. Relatively little information is available on forage agronomic responses to application of this second pond liquid.

The effect of applying this second pond dairy effluent to perennial ryegrass based pasture was measured over a 3-year period. Effluent was applied at 6 rates: 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 mm following spring silage harvest each year. Changes to herbage dry matter (DM) accumulation, and botanical composition were determined at each subsequent grazing.

Over the 3 years of application, the average concentrations of phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur in the effluent were 31, 454, and 20 kg/ML, respectively. In addition, the effluent contained 149 kg/ML of nitrogen and 529 kg/ML of sodium.

For all 3 years, the application of effluent resulted in a linear increase (P > 0.05) in annual herbage DM accumulation. Response rates for the 3 years were 27, 22, and 9 kg DM/mm applied effluent, respectively. The majority of this response occurred by the first grazing after application, where effluent application gave rise to linear responses (P > 0.05) in herbage DM accumulation of 17, 18, and 7 kg DM/mm for Years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Botanical composition was not significantly affected by effluent application.

This experiment has highlighted the potential of using second pond dairy effluent following pasture harvesting for silage as a means to grow additional herbage and extend the growing season. Based on the N content of effluent, herbage DM accumulation responses (Year 1, 10.4; Year 2, 11.4; Year 3, 5.1 kg DM/kg N) were similar to those expected from application of fertiliser N. It is likely that the primary response in terms of herbage accumulation is due to the N component within dairy effluent. While this study has shown positive herbage DM accumulation responses to applied effluent, further work is required to determine longer term effects of repeated effluent application, especially sodium, to soil characteristics.


Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Victorian Government, Dairy Australia, and the Geoffrey Gardiner Foundation for providing financial assistance for this study. We also thank DemoDAIRY for the use of land on their farm to undertake the study. The technical support of Stewart Burch, Troy Jenkin, and Phillip Maskell and biometrical analyses by Gavin Kearney are also acknowledged.


References


APHA (1998) ‘Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.’ 20th edn (Eds LS Clesceri, AE Greenberg, AD Eaton) (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation)

Balks MR, Bond WJ, Smith CJ (1998) Effects of sodium accumulation on soil physical properties under an effluent irrigated plantation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 36, 821–830.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Bolan NS, Horne DJ, Currie LD (2004) Growth and chemical composition of legume-based pasture irrigated with dairy farm effluent. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 85–93. open url image1

Cameron KC, Di HJ, McLaren RG (1997) Is soil an appropriate dumping ground for our wastes? Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 995–1035.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Crocos A , Wrigley R (1993) ‘Dairy waste management.’ (Victorian College of Agriculture and Horticulture: Warragul, Vic.)

Di HJ, Cameron KC (2002) Nitrate leaching and pasture production from different nitrogen sources on a shallow stoney soil under flood irrigated dairy pasture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 317–334.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Earle DF, McGowan AA (1979) Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 19, 337–343.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Feigin A , Ravina I , Shalhevet J (1991) ‘Irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Management for environmental protection.’ (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Fulkerson WJ, Donaghy DJ (2001) Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence—key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

GenStat Committee (2003) ‘GenStat® Release 7.1.’(VSN International Ltd: Oxford, UK)

Goold GJ (1980) Rates of farm dairy effluent applied to pastures on clay soils in Northland. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 8, 93–99. open url image1

Jacobs JL, McKenzie FR, Rigby SE, Kearney G (1998) Effect of nitrogen fertiliser application and length of lock up on dairy pasture dry matter yield and quality for silage in south-western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 219–226.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL, McKenzie FR, Ward GN (1999) Changes in the botanical composition and nutritive characteristics of pasture, and nutrient selection by dairy cows grazing rainfed pastures in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 419–428.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jacobs JL , Ward GN (2003) Effect of different rates of dairy effluent on turnip DM yields and nutritive characteristics. In ‘Solutions for a better environment. Proceedings of the 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Geelong, Vic. (Australian Society of Agronomy)

Jacobs JL, Ward GN (2007) Effect of second pond dairy effluent applied in spring to silage regrowth of perennial ryegrass based pasture in southern Australia. 2. Changes in nutritive characteristics and mineral content. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 145–151. open url image1

Lautenenschlaeger W (1989) Atomic spectroscopy advances. Microwave digestion in a closed-vessel, high pressure system. Spectroscopy 4, 16–21. open url image1

Longhurst RD, Roberts AHC, O’Connor MB (2000) Farm dairy effluent: a review of published data on chemical and physical characteristics in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 7–14. open url image1

Nakashima S, Sturgeon E, Willie SN, Berman SS (1988) Acid digestion of marine samples for trace element analysis using microwave heating. The Analyst 113, 159–163.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Northcote KH , Skene JKM (1972) ‘Australian soils with saline and sodic properties.’ CSIRO Soil Publication No. 27. (CSIRO: Melbourne, Vic.)

Roach CG, Stevens G, Clark DA, Nicholas P (2001) Effects of effluent and urea application on groundwater, soil and pasture at WTARS. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 62, 173–178. open url image1

Roberts AHC , O’Connor MB , Lonhurst RD (1992) Wastes as plant nutrient sources: issues and options. In ‘The use of wastes and by-products as fertilisers and soil amendments for pastures and crops’. Occasional Report No. 6. (Eds PEH Gregg, LD Currie) pp. 44–55. (Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University: Palmerston North, New Zealand)

Shaw RJ (1999) Soil salinity—electrical conductivity and chloride. In ‘Soil analysis: an interpretation manual’. (Eds KI Peverill, LA Sparrow, DJ Reuter) (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) (2003) ‘Policy impact statement. Our water our future.’ Publication 905. (EPA Victoria: Southbank, Vic.)

Victorian Irrigation Research and Advisory Services Committee (1980) ‘Quality aspects of water farm supplies.’ 2nd edn (Victorian Irrigation Research and Advisory Services Committee: Melbourne, Vic.)

Wang H, Magesan GN, Bolan NS (2004) An overview of the environmental effects of land application of farm effluents. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 389–403. open url image1

Ward GN , Jacobs JL (2006) Determination of environmentally safe dairy effluent application rates to dryland pasture: 1. Effects on soil. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian Dairy Science Symposium’. (Dairy Science: Mt Gambier, S. Aust.)

Whitehead DC (1995) ‘Grassland nitrogen.’ (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

Wilcox LV (1958) Determining the quality of irrigation water. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 197, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.