Register      Login
Microbiology Australia Microbiology Australia Society
Microbiology Australia, bringing Microbiologists together
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Manipulating the soil microbiome for improved nitrogen management

Hang-Wei Hu A and Ji-Zheng He B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9035 7639, Email: hang-wei.hu@unimelb.edu.au

B School of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Vic. 3010, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9035 8890, Email: jizheng.he@unimelb.edu.au

Microbiology Australia 39(1) 24-27 https://doi.org/10.1071/MA18007
Published: 21 February 2018

Abstract

The soil microbiome, including bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, and other microbial eukaryotes, has crucial roles in the biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen (N), the maintenance of soil fertility, and the plant N use efficiency (NUE) in agro-ecosystems1. Recent advances in omics-based technologies (e.g. metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metaproteomics) have expanded our understanding of the soil microbiome and their controls on specific N-cycling processes13. Given the growing N-based fertiliser consumption and continuous land degradation, innovative technologies are needed to manipulate the soil microbiome to improve crop NUE, reduce N losses and increase N reservation in soil. This article discusses the research directions to facilitate the development of microbiome-manipulating technologies for sustainable management of N transformation processes.


References

[1]  Fierer, N. (2017) Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579–590.
Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhtlGktbfN&md5=b79aeb90c64d09f110fd78ab6a3d9586CAS |

[2]  Thompson, L.R. et al. (2017) A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463.
A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhslehurzL&md5=3c9acc3e93eae5c4dd3365fb6c68e566CAS |

[3]  Trivedi, P. et al. (2017) Tiny microbes, big yields: enhancing food crop production with biological solutions. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 999–1003.
Tiny microbes, big yields: enhancing food crop production with biological solutions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Hu, H.W. et al. (2015) Microbial regulation of terrestrial nitrous oxide formation: understanding the biological pathways for prediction of emission rates. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 729–749.
Microbial regulation of terrestrial nitrous oxide formation: understanding the biological pathways for prediction of emission rates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhs1ektrnO&md5=943ad334f9e26eb47172bac459efceacCAS |

[5]  Coskun, D. et al. (2017) Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition. Nat. Plants 3, 17074.
Nitrogen transformations in modern agriculture and the role of biological nitrification inhibition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXpt1yjs7k%3D&md5=bd98e8cb593e7a1fe0a3351d8cf30f60CAS |

[6]  Zhang, L.M. et al. (2012) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea have more important role than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in ammonia oxidation of strongly acidic soils. ISME J. 6, 1032–1045.
Ammonia-oxidizing archaea have more important role than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in ammonia oxidation of strongly acidic soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XlvVGktrw%3D&md5=5cea00b9ab880ef964fd12c7ed406817CAS |

[7]  Hu, H.W. and He, J.Z. (2017) Comammox – a newly discovered nitrification process in the terrestrial nitrogen cycle. J. Soils Sediments 17, 2709–2717.
Comammox – a newly discovered nitrification process in the terrestrial nitrogen cycle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhslGhtrrP&md5=3647a6bbb6d31d5d0dd27dd7582d4d00CAS |

[8]  Hu, H.W. et al. (2017) Harnessing microbiome-based biotechnologies for sustainable mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 1226–1231.
Harnessing microbiome-based biotechnologies for sustainable mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhsFOntLvF&md5=a842bcd5688ac66dc2b3cc3a6238f928CAS |

[9]  Shi, X. et al. (2016) Effects of the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate on nitrification and nitrifiers in two contrasting agricultural soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5236–5248.
Effects of the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate on nitrification and nitrifiers in two contrasting agricultural soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitVahurvN&md5=6a15180298b7f54c308a0cbbd0d3ff79CAS |

[10]  Shi, X.Z. et al. (2017) Response of ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers to repeated applications of a nitrification inhibitor and a urease inhibitor in two pasture soils. J. Soils Sediments 17, 974–984.
Response of ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers to repeated applications of a nitrification inhibitor and a urease inhibitor in two pasture soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhvVyns73I&md5=f8a1a162cda396dbcf35bb1a58acee0aCAS |

[11]  Fisk, L.M. et al. (2015) Root exudate carbon mitigates nitrogen loss in a semi-arid soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 380–389.
Root exudate carbon mitigates nitrogen loss in a semi-arid soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhtVyiurnN&md5=8b629fa03e023cf18df6153533bd0f5bCAS |

[12]  Lam, S.K. et al. (2017) Using nitrification inhibitors to mitigate agricultural N2O emission: a double-edged sword? Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 485–489.
Using nitrification inhibitors to mitigate agricultural N2O emission: a double-edged sword?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Singh, B.K. and Trivedi, P. (2017) Microbiome and the future for food and nutrient security. Microb. Biotechnol. 10, 50–53.
Microbiome and the future for food and nutrient security.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Leach, J.E. et al. (2017) Communication in the phytobiome. Cell 169, 587–596.
Communication in the phytobiome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXnt1Cmsb8%3D&md5=e1afc132f5dfe69ee7c9fcffbcfd71aaCAS |

[15]  Subbarao, G.V. et al. (2009) Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 17302–17307.
Evidence for biological nitrification inhibition in Brachiaria pastures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhs1WktrjE&md5=ba98009760b893f13c7f5f972201acf3CAS |

[16]  Bardon, C. et al. (2014) Evidence for biological denitrification inhibition (BDI) by plant secondary metabolites. New Phytol. 204, 620–630.
Evidence for biological denitrification inhibition (BDI) by plant secondary metabolites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhslOjs7jO&md5=a2f2a68a49d255a2282a1c312c640735CAS |

[17]  Itakura, M. et al. (2013) Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions from soils by Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 208–212.
Mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions from soils by Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjtVajsr8%3D&md5=b2b5887b1438e68023f15f5101f69c49CAS |

[18]  Gao, N. et al. (2017) Nitrous oxide (N2O)-reducing denitrifier-inoculated organic fertilizer mitigates N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 53, 885–898.
Nitrous oxide (N2O)-reducing denitrifier-inoculated organic fertilizer mitigates N2O emissions from agricultural soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXht1yltL%2FM&md5=373202f519ac722361df221995203767CAS |

[19]  Sheth, R.U. et al. (2016) Manipulating bacterial communities by in situ microbiome engineering. Trends Genet. 32, 189–200.
Manipulating bacterial communities by in situ microbiome engineering.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitlSgtbw%3D&md5=5c627b40e940984b0ae0fd748c736b4dCAS |

[20]  Alivisatos, A.P. et al. (2015) A unified initiative to harness Earth’s microbiomes. Science 350, 507–508.
A unified initiative to harness Earth’s microbiomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsl2nsL%2FM&md5=017c0a759b18ee933d6dcb83da560ddbCAS |

[21]  Mellbye, B.L. et al. (2016) Quorum quenching of Nitrobacter winogradskyi suggests that quorum sensing regulates fluxes of nitrogen oxide(s) during nitrification. MBio 7, e01753–16.
Quorum quenching of Nitrobacter winogradskyi suggests that quorum sensing regulates fluxes of nitrogen oxide(s) during nitrification.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Citorik, R.J. et al. (2014) Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145.
Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFyhsrjP&md5=0f1eb87f8b3f5893d9f0675053886990CAS |

[23]  Mueller, U.G. and Sachs, J.L. (2015) Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends Microbiol. 23, 606–617.
Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsFKhtL7L&md5=85771a94a2e5267c5c2b377ec5c9d1a5CAS |