Verifying legislative and customer requirements utilising animal welfare quality assurance
M. K. Edge A D , P. H. Hemsworth B C and J. L. Barnett CA Symbio Alliance Consulting, 44 Brandl Street, Eight Mile Plains, Qld 4113, Australia.
B Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.
C Animal Welfare Science Centre, Department of Primary Industries, 600 Sneydes Road, Werribee,Vic. 3030, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: medge@symbioalliance.com.au
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48(7) 1022-1027 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA08025
Submitted: 8 January 2008 Accepted: 17 April 2008 Published: 20 June 2008
Abstract
The development of animal welfare in quality assurance (QA) programs and audits for several of the livestock industries is briefly described, with emphasis on the ability of these programs to provide a framework to manage and demonstrate compliance with the various legislative and commercial animal welfare requirements in Australia. There is a clear role for these programs to provide the framework for compliance with legislative standards in a similar manner to the commercial standards set by customers of the livestock industries. However, options for implementing legislation in this manner in Australia are still under consideration. QA programs need to be acceptable to the community, be able to meet all customers’ requirements and demonstrate to government authorities that animal welfare standards have been met. QA programs that include animal welfare will be better accepted when their ability to deliver comprehensive benefits and continual improvements in animal welfare have been formally evaluated. Additionally, the impact of animal welfare QA programs will only be fully realised by better demonstrating their ability to deliver verification of legislative and commercial standards, benefits to industry in terms of efficiency and production and consequent acceptability by customers and the broad community. To date, such QA programs have only begun to meet all these needs.
Barnett JL,
Edge MK, Hemsworth PH
(2008) The place of quality assurance in managing animal welfare during long distance transport. Veterinaria Italiana 44, 121–131.
[Verified 19 April 2008]
Knierim U,
Hesse U,
von Borell E,
Herrmann HJ,
Muller C,
Rauch HW,
Sachser N, Zerbe F
(2003) Voluntary animal welfare assessment of mass-produced farm animal housing equipment using a standardised procedure. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 12, 75–84.
|
CAS |
[Verified 19 April 2008]
Von Borell E, Mitloehner FM
(2004) On-farm monitoring of animal welfare and environmental impact as a basis for quality assurance programmes. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica (Suppl. 1), 55–66.
Von Borell E, Sorensen J
(2001) Critical control points for on-farm assessment of pig housing. Livestock Production Science 72, 177–184.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Webster J
(2005) The assessment and implementation of animal welfare: theory into practice. Revue Scientifique Et Technique – Office International des Epizooties 24, 723–734.
|
CAS |
Wood JD,
Holder JS, Main DCJ
(1998) Quality assurance schemes. Meat Science 49(Suppl. 1), S191–S203.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
