Research on pair and small group work has shown that collaborative writing tasks generally encourage learners to focus on language. However, some studies (e.g., Storch 2002) have also shown that patterns of interaction during collaborative writing tasks affect the quantity and quality of learners’ attention to language and ultimately language learning. The study reported in this chapter compared patterns of interaction of the same pairs of intermediate ESL learners completing a collaborative writing task in a face-to-face and a computer-mediated mode (Google Docs). The study found that mode had an impact on patterns of interaction and attention to language. Learners were more likely to collaborate in the face-to-face mode and to cooperate in the computer-mediated mode. It was only when learners collaborated, that they engaged extensively in deliberations about language.
(2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–266). Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M.P
(2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In M.P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in foreign language learning (pp.91–116). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Bradley, L., Lindström, B., & Rystedt, H
(2010) Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL 22(2), 247–265.
Cumming, A
(1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141.
Donato, R
(1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J.P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A
(2010) Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14, 51–71.
Fernández Dobao, A
(2012) Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 40–58.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A
(2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430.
Fujii, A., & Mackey, A
(2009) Interactional feedback in learner-learner interactions in a task- based EFL classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 267–302.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L
(2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 189–220.
Iwasaki, J., & Oliver, R
(2003) Chat-line interaction and negative feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 60–73.
Kaneko, A
(2009) Comparing computer-mediated communication (CMC) and face-to-face (FTF) communication for the development of Japanese as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: [URL] (10 November, 2013).
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D
(2010) Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer-mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41–58.
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J
(2012) Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning and Technology,16, 91–109.
Kim, Y
(2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–130.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K
(2011) Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative language learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15, 183–199.
Kost, C
(2011) Investigating writing strategies and revision behaviour in collaborative writing projects. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 606–620.
LaPierre, D
(1994) Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Toronto.
Leeser, M.J
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55–81.
Li, M., & Zhu, W
(2011) Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 1–22.
Loewen, S., & Reissner, S
(2009) A comparison of incidental focus on form in the second language classroom and chat room. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 101–114.
Loewen, S., & Wolff, D
(2016) Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M.H
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Lund, A
(2008) Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54.
Mackey, A
(2007) Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 85–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A
(2008) Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31–47.
Moranski, K., & Toth, P
(2016) Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 291–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Niu, R
(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 384–402.
Ohta, A.S
(2001) Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ortega, L
(2009) Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. Second language research in honour of Susan Gass (pp. 226–253). New York, NY: Routledge.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I
(2011) Meeting at the wiki: The new arena for collaborative writing in foreign language courses. In M. Lee & C. McLaughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp. 209–227). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I
(2012) Understanding the impact of social tools in the FL writing classroom: Activity theory at work. In G. Kessler, A. Oskoz & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 131–153). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
O’Sullivan, B
(2002) Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19, 277–295.
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H
(2010) Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: what factors foster a focus on form?Language Awareness, 19, 261–279.
Qi, D.S, & Lapkin, S
(2001) Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277–303.
Rouhshad, A
(2013) Nature of negotiations in face-to-face and computer-mediate communication, paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL) conference, Dallas, TX, March.
Rouhshad, A
(2014) The nature of negotiations in computer-mediated and face-to-face modes with/without writing modality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: [URL] (19 April 2014).
Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N
forthcoming). The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer mediated communication in pair interaction. Language Teaching Research.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2012) Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-method examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S
(2016) Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Storch, N
(2001) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53.
Storch, N
(2002) Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119–158.
Storch, N
(2008) Metatalk in pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
Storch, N
(2009) The nature of pair interaction. Learners’ interaction in an ESL class: its nature and impact on grammatical development. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
Storch, N
(2011) Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.
Storch, N
(2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A
(2013) Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31–48.
Swain, M
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M
( 2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
Swain, M
(2010) Talking-it-through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batestone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Review, 58, 44–63.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S
(2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, M. Swain, (Eds.), Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (pp. 99–118). London: Longman.
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L
(2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29.
Tan, L., Wigglesworth G., & Storch N
(2010) Pair interactions and mode of communication: Comparing face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 1–24.
Vygotsky, L.S
(1978) Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S
(1981) The genesis of higher mental functions. In J.V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M
(2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–142.
Wells, G
(1999) Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, J
(2008) The speaking-writing connection in second language and academic literacy development. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 10–25). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Williams, J
(2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–333.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S, & Ross, G
(1976) The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Zorko, V
(2009) Factors affecting the way students collaborate in a wiki for English language learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 645–665.
2022. Wiki-Based Collaborative Writing: Undergraduate Learners’ Perspectives. In Local Research and Glocal Perspectives in English Language Teaching, ► pp. 213 ff.
Azkarai, Agurtzane, María del Pilar García Mayo & Rhonda Oliver
2021. Corrective Feedback in Computer-Mediated versus Face-to-Face Environments. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 494 ff.
2022. Enhanced Language Use Through from Peer and Teacher Feedback, Self-directed Learning and Interaction in the Target Language. In Integrated Language Learning & Social Awareness: Research and Practice [SpringerBriefs in Education, ], ► pp. 43 ff.
DAO, PHUNG, MAI XUAN NHAT CHI NGUYEN, PHUONG–THAO DUONG & VU TRAN–THANH
2021. Learners’ Engagement in L2 Computer‐Mediated Interaction: Chat Mode, Interlocutor Familiarity, and Text Quality. The Modern Language Journal 105:4 ► pp. 767 ff.
2023. “Pero yo también estoy aprendiendo”: Negotiating expert and novice positions in heritage–second language learner interaction. The Modern Language Journal 107:4 ► pp. 873 ff.
García Mayo, Maria del Pilar & Ainara Imaz Agirre
2016. Task repetition and its impact on EFL children’s negotiation of meaning strategies and pair dynamics: an exploratory study. The Language Learning Journal 44:4 ► pp. 451 ff.
2022. Peer interaction and attention to form in web-based synchronous and asynchronous L2 collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning► pp. 1 ff.
2023. Synchronous VCMC with TalkAbroad: Exploring noticing, transcription, and learner perceptions in Spanish foreign-language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 642 ff.
2020. The effects of oral discussion and text chat on L2 Chinese writing. Foreign Language Annals 53:4 ► pp. 666 ff.
Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2 ► pp. 134 ff.
Kozlova, Iryna
2019. Factors Affecting Learner Collaboration in 3D Virtual Worlds. In Assessing the Effectiveness of Virtual Technologies in Foreign and Second Language Instruction [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 26 ff.
Kozlova, Iryna
2022. Factors Affecting Learner Collaboration in 3D Virtual Worlds. In Research Anthology on Virtual Environments and Building the Metaverse, ► pp. 117 ff.
Martin‐Beltrán, Melinda, Andrés A. García & Angélica Montoya‐Ávila
2020. “I Know There's Something Like That in Spanish”: Heritage Language Learners' Multifaceted Interactions with Linguistically Diverse Peers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 530 ff.
Mizza, Daria & Fernando Rubio
2020. Creating Effective Blended Language Learning Courses,
2019. The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations. Education and Information Technologies 24:5 ► pp. 3177 ff.
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff.
Tavakol, Mahbube, Mansoor Tavakoli & Saeed Ketabi
2022. The impact of linguistic background on the nature of classroom dyadic interactions: evidence from L2 and L3 learners of English as a foreign language. International Multilingual Research Journal 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
TORRES, JULIO & BIANCA CUNG
2019. A Comparison of Advanced Heritage Language Learners’ Peer Interaction Across Modes and Pair Types. The Modern Language Journal 103:4 ► pp. 815 ff.
Wang, Shuyan
2024. The Dimensions and Dynamism of Group Engagement in Computer-Mediated Collaborative Writing in EFL Classes. SAGE Open 14:1
Wang, Weiwei & Lianjiang Jiang
2023. Writing on WeChat moments: impact on writing performance and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:7 ► pp. 1236 ff.
Zhang, Meixiu & Qi Liu
2023. Synchronous and asynchronous online collaborative writing: A study on Chinese language learners. Foreign Language Annals 56:3 ► pp. 740 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.