Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T23:58:14.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency of digestion in germ-free and conventional rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

T. Yoshida ,
J. R. Pleasants ,
B. S. Reddy  and
B. S. Wostmann
T. Yoshida
Affiliation:
Lobund Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
J. R. Pleasants
Affiliation:
Lobund Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
B. S. Reddy
Affiliation:
Lobund Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
B. S. Wostmann
Affiliation:
Lobund Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Germ-free (GF) and conventional (CV) rabbits wearing collars to prevent coprophagy were fed an autoclaved diet with added cellulose. Their faecal excretion was analysed to determine nutrient digestibility.

2. Clearly distinguishable hard faeces were excreted by the GF rabbit only if the diet contained at least 15% cellulose. Unlike CV rabbits, the GF rabbits did not consume their soft faeces even when permitted to do so. Soft faeces made up a larger proportion of the total output of GF than of CV rabbits. Food intake and total dry-matter excretion per kg body-weight were similar in both groups.

3. Although digestibility of dry matter was similar in the two groups, in the GF rabbits there was a higher digestibility of crude fat and true protein and a lower digestibility of crude fibre and nitrogen-free extract. GF rabbits excreted a higher percentage of ingested calcium and phosphorus in the urine than did CV rabbits.

4. The results suggest that intestinal microbes, even without the enhancing effect of coprophagy, aid in the digestion of carbohydrate by rabbits. The greater faecal excretion of crude fat and true protein by CV rabbits could result from poorer digestion and absorption, but could also represent nutrients synthesized by microbes from simpler materials. The reingestion of faecal crude fat and true protein might therefore improve the quality of the total nutrient intake. The results suggest ways of assuring an adequate dietary intake by GF rabbits in the absence of contributions from an intestinal microflora.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 1968 , pp. 723 - 737
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1968

References

Abrams, G. D., Bauer, H. & Sprinz, H. (1963). Lab. Invest. 12, 355.Google Scholar
Allen, R. J. L. (1940). Biochem. J. 34, 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AndersonR. F., R. F.,Rhodes, R. A., Nelson, G. E. N., Shekleton, M. C., Barreto, A. Jr & Arnold, M. (1958). J. Bact. 76, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Official Methods of Analysis, 9th ed. Washington, D.C.: Association of Official Agricultural ChemistsGoogle Scholar
Baker, F., Nasr, H., Morrice, F. & Bruce, J. (1950). J. Path. Bact. 62, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigwood, E. J. (1963). C. r. Rech. Inst. Encour. scient. Ind. Agric. no. 30, p. 142.Google Scholar
Block, R. J. & Weiss, K. W. (1956). Amino Acid Handbook: Methods and Results of Protein Analysis. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Combe, É., Penot, É., Charlier, H. & Sacquet, E. (1965). Annls Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 5, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1962). Scand. J. clin. Lab. Invest. 4, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1963). Biochim J. 86, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, A. M. & Isselbacher, K. J. (1960). J. clin. Invest. 39, 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, A. (1940 a). Nature, Lond. 145, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eden, A. (1940 b). Nature, Lond. 145, 628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, H. M. Jr & Boyd, F. M. (1963). Poult. Sci. 42, 1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrard, E., Hoet, P. O., Eyssen, H., Charlier, H. & Sacquet, E. (1964). Br. J. exp. Path. 45, 409.Google Scholar
Griffiths, M. & Davies, D. (1963). J. Nutr. 80, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, B. E. & Norman, A. (1962). J. exp. Med. 116, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, W. (1949). Verh. dt. Zool. Mainz. 2, 95.Google Scholar
Herndon, J. F. & Hove, E. L. (1955). J. Nutr. 57, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T. C., Ulrich, H. E. & McCay, C. M. (1954). J. Nutr. 54, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingols, R. S. & Murray, P. E. (1949). Analyt. Chem. 21, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kametaka, M. (1967). Agric. biol. Chem. 31, 616.Google Scholar
Kandatsu, M. & Yasui, T. (1955). J. agric. chem. Soc. Japan 25, 27.Google Scholar
Kandatsu, M., Yoshihara, I. & Yoshida, T. (1959). Jap. J. zootech. Sci. 29, 365.Google Scholar
Kubo, S. & Tsutsumi, C. (1951). Shokuryo Kenkyujo Hokoku 5, 171.Google Scholar
Kulwich, R., Struglia, L. & Pearson, P. B. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S., Furuta, F., Ozone, K., Koike, T. & Wagner, M. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, S. M. & Tennant, B. (1963). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 22, 109.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, G., Lindstedt, S. & Gustafsson, B. E. (1965). J. exp. Med. 121, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luckey, T. D. (1963). Germfree Life and Gnotobiology. New York and London: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
McNaught, M. L., Smith, J. A. B., Henry, K. M. & Kon, S. K. (1950). Biochem. J. 46, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, H. (1939). Nature, Lond. 143, 981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyakawa, M. (1963). Mukindobutsu (Germfree Animals). Tokyo: Ishiyakushuppan.Google Scholar
Morot, C. (1882). Mém. Soc. cent. Med. vet. 12, Ser. 1.Google Scholar
Newton, W. L. & DeWitt, W. B. (1961). J. Nutr. 75, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olcese, O., Pearson, P. B. & Schweigert, B. S. (1948). J. Nutr. 35, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, H. M. & Madsen, H. (1944) Vidensk, Meddr. dansk. natur. Foren. 107, 37.Google Scholar
Pleasants, J. R., Zimmerman, D. R., Reddy, B. S. & Wostmann, B. S. (1963). In Proceedings of the Gnotobiote Workshop and Symposium, p. 36. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Reddy, B. S., Pleasants, J. R., Zimmerman, D. R. & Wostmann, B. S. (1965). J. Nutr. 87, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, B. S. & Wostmann, B. S. (1966). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 113, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyniers, J. A. (1959). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 78, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyniers, J. A. & Sacksteder, M. R. (1958). Proc. Anim. Care Panel 8, 41.Google Scholar
Rice, E. E. & Beuk, J. F. (1953). In Advances in Food Research. Vol. 4, p. 233. [Mrak, E. M. and Stewart, G. F. editors.] New York, N.Y.: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Scheunert, A. & Zimmermann, K. (1952). Arch. f. Tierernahr. 3, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, H. N. (1940). Nature, Lond. 145, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southern, H. H. (1942). Nature, Lond. 149, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperry, W. M. (1929). J. biol. Chem. 81, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinz, H. (1962). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 21, 57.Google Scholar
Stern, P., Huković, S. & Fukarek, V. (1955). Gastroenterologia 83, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1939). Nature, Lond. 143, 982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1940). Vet. Rec. 52, 259.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. L. (1941). Proc. zool. Soc., Lond. A 110, 519.Google Scholar
Thacker, E. J. (1956). J. Nutr. 58, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, E. J. & Brandt, C. S. (1955). J. Nutr. 55, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trexler, P. C. (1959). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 78, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M. (1958). Bact. Proc. 11, 88.Google Scholar
Wostmann, B. S. & Bruckner-Kardoss, E. (1959). Am. J. Physiol. 197, 1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wostmann, B. S. & Knight, P. L. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynngate, A. E., Horton, R. E. & Forbes, M. (1958). Germfree Animal Studies, p. 93. (University of Pennsylvania Project, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center.)Google Scholar
Yoshida, T. (1967). Jap. J. zootech. Sci. 38, 370.Google Scholar
Yoshihara, T. & Kandatsu, M. (1960). Bull. agric. chem. Soc. Japan 24, 543.Google Scholar