Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:20:53.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of intraruminal infusions of urea, casein, glucose syrup and a mixture of casein and glucose syrup on nitrogen digestion in the rumen of cattle receiving grass-silage diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. A. Rooke ,
N. H. Lee  and
D. G. Armstrong
J. A. Rooke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
N. H. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
D. G. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NEl 7RU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In an incomplete 5 x 5 Latin square experiment, four cattle were given grass silage in two meals per d to satisfy 1.15 maintenance energy requirements. In addition, water or casein (21 g nitrogen and 0.17 kg organic matter (OM)/d) or urea (U; 28 g N/d) or a glucose syrup (G; 0.87 kg OM/d) or casein and glucose syrup (CG; 17 g N and 0.93 kg OM/d) were infused intraruminally at a constant rate.

2. A 24 h collection of duodenal digesta was made using chromic oxide for flow estimation and 35S as a marker of microbial N entering the small intestine. Samples of rumen fluid were also taken for estimation of rumen pH, and concentrations of ammonia-N and volatile fatty acids.

3. The intraruminal infusions had no significant effects on rumen pH, concentrations of volatile fatty acids or their molar proportions. Infusion of either C or U significantly (P < 0.05) increased rumen NH3-N concentrations whereas infusions of either G or CG lowered rumen NH3-N concentrations.

4. Infusions of C or U had no significant effect on the quantities of OM, acid-detergent fibre (ADF) or N constituents which entered the small intestine.

5. Infusions of G or CG increased the quantities of OM (G P < 0.05, CG P < 0.01), ADF (CG P < 0.05), non-NH3-N (G P < 0.05, CG P < 0.01), amino acid N (G P < 0.05, CG P < 0.01) and microbial N (G P < 0.05, CG P < 0.01) which entered the small intestine.

6. The efficiency of rumen microbial N synthesis was unchanged by the infusion of C, U or G (P > 0.05) but increased significantly (P < 0.05) when CG were infused.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 89 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock Supplement, no. 1. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Böttcher, W. (1982). Archiv für Tierernährung 32, 287–394.Google Scholar
Brett, P. A., Almond, M., Harrison, D. G., Rowlinson, P., Rooke, J. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1979). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 148A.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Wait, M. K. (1982). Grass and Forage Science 37, 159&164.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C., Wilson, W., Newbold, C. J. & McDonald, J. C. (1985). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 104, 331–340.Google Scholar
Dunnett, C. W. (1955). Journal of the American Statistical Association 50, 1096–1121.Google Scholar
England, P. & Gill, M. (1985). Animal Production 49, 259–265.Google Scholar
Gill, M. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1977). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 43–51.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. & Milligan, L. P. (1980). Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 205–221.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. (1981). The Biochemistry of Silage. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
McMeniman, N. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 181–188.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 23, 15–23.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 587–604.Google Scholar
Miller, E. L. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production no. 6, pp. 79–88 [Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Offer, N. W., Axford, R. F. E. & Evans, R. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 35–44.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brett, P. A., Overend, M. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1985 a). Animal Feed Science and Technology 13, 255–267.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brookes, I. M. & Armstrong, D. G. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production no. 6, pp. 185–186 [Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Brookes, I. M. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983 a). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 329–342.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Greife, H. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1983 b). Grass and Forage Science 38, 302–310.Google Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Greife, H. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1985 b). British Journal of Nutrition 53, 691–708.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Evans, R. T. & Beever, D. E. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 42, 535–545.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Nolan, J. V., Beever, D. E. & MacRae, J. C. (1985). British Journal of Nutrition 54, 175–187.Google Scholar
Syrjala, L. (1972). Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 11, 199–276.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. (1982). In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production no. 6, pp. 67–78 [Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors]. Thames Ditton: British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Chamberlain, D. G., Kelly, N. C. & Wait, M. K. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 469–480.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Lonsdale, C. R., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B. & Austin, A. R. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 193–208.Google Scholar