Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T01:21:35.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence of Libyostrongylus douglassii in commercially reared ostriches in the highveld region of Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

S. Mukaratirwa ,
Z.M. Cindzi  and
D.B. Maononga
S. Mukaratirwa*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Z.M. Cindzi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
D.B. Maononga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
*
*Fax: 263 4 333683 E-mail: smukarati@vet.uz.ac.zw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 435 freshly dropped faecal samples were collected from 11 randomly selected ostrich farms during September and November 2002 to determine the prevalence of Libyostrongylus douglassii (ostrich wireworm) in the highveld region of Zimbabwe. Samples, which consisted of 339 samples from breeder birds and 96 samples from pre-slaughter grower birds were screened for nematode eggs using the modified McMaster technique before being individually cultured in an incubator at 28°C. Cultures were examined for the presence of L. douglassii third stage larvae (L3). Using faecal egg counts, eight of 11 farms (72.7%) were positive for L. douglassii in breeders but no eggs were detected in the growers. The faecal culture method detected wireworm larvae in the breeding stock of all farms that were surveyed (100%) and five of the eight farms (62.5%) which had grower birds. Libyostrongylus douglassii was detected in all farms (100%) based on the faecal culture method. Libyostrongylus douglassii was detected for the first time in 7 of 11 farms (64%) surveyed. Data from questionnaires designed to assess farm management practices showed that four out of seven (57.1%) of the ostrich producers were unaware of the importance of wireworms in ostriches. The farms did not have a regular deworming programme for their birds and no faecal samples were sent routinely to the veterinary laboratory for screening of wireworms. Wireworm infections were not taken into consideration by farmers during buying and selling of birds.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 333 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barton, N.J. & Seward, D.A. (1993) Detection of Libyostrongylus douglassii in ostriches in Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 70, 31–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, C., Barton, N.J., Veale, P.I. & Overend, D.J. (1993) A survey of Libyostrongylus douglassii on ostrich farms in Eastern Victoria. Australian Veterinary Journal 70, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, T.M. & Diamond, P.L. (1996) Parasites of ratites. pp. 115–126 in Tully, T.N. & Shane, S.M. (Eds) Ratite management, medicine and surgery. Malabar, Florida, Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.G. (1999) Ostrich production in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Science News 33, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A.M. (1978) Veterinary helminthology. 2nd edn. 31 pp. London, William Heinemann Medical Books Limited.Google Scholar
Dzoma, B.M. & Dorrestein, G.M. (1998) Problems in ostrich rearing. Equator 10, 1–6.Google Scholar
Hoberg, E.P., Lloyd, S. & Osmar, H. (1995) Libyostrongylus dentatus, n. sp. (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) from ostriches in North America, with comments on the genera Libyostrongylus and Paralibyostrongylus . Journal of Parasitology 81, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchzermeyer, F.W. (1999) Veterinary problems in ostriches. pp. 293–320 in Deeming, D.C. (Ed.) The ostrich: biology, production and health. Wallingford, Oxon, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Lapage, G. (1965) Monning's veterinary helminthology and entomology. 5th edn. pp. 263–264. London, Bailliere, Tindall and Cassell.Google Scholar
Malan, F.S., Gruss, B., Roper, N.A., Ashburner, A.J. & DuPlesis, C.A. (1988) Resistance of Libyostrongylus douglassii in ostriches to levamisole. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 59, 202–203.Google Scholar
Reinecke, R.K. (1983) Veterinary helminthology. pp. 124–126 Durban, Butterworth.Google Scholar
Shane, S.M. (1998) Infectious diseases and parasites of ratites. Veterinary Clinics of North America 14, 455–483.Google ScholarPubMed
Sloss, M.W., Kemp, R.L. & Zajac, A. (1994) Veterinary clinical parasitology. 6th edn. pp. 9–13 Ames, Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Soulsby, E.J.L. (1982) Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals. 7th edn. pp. 260–261 London, Bailliere and Tindall.Google Scholar
Tully, T.N. & Shane, S.M. (1996) Husbandry practices as related to infectious and parasitic diseases of farmed ratites. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’ Office International des Epizooties 15, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed