- Record: found
- Abstract: found
- Article: found
RHETORIC AND REPRESENTATION IN AUSTRALIAN SCIENCE IN THE 1940s AND 1980s
Abstract
The title of this paper is not meant to imply comprehensive treatment of developments in Australian science from the 1940s to the 1980s. Its more modest objective is to isolate particular parallels in the debates and rhetoric about science in these two decades. It argues that shifting political and economic contexts condition scientists' preferred strategies of self-legitimation. These shifts may cause major realignments within the scientific power structure. Two such shifts occurred during the 1940s. Coinciding with the outbreak of World War II, the catchcry of ‘science for society’ catalysed unprecedented moves to register science as a key national resource. But the projection of the scientist as social engineer/mediator was not to be realised. With the onset of the Cold War, the scientific community reverted to the defence of autonomy and non-interventionism in scientific organisation. Scientific ‘excellence’ rapidly replaced ‘relevance’ as a justification for government support of science. The appeal to freedom from political interference remains a powerful article of faith within the stratified research hierarchy. Increasingly, however, the rationale of autonomy is out of step with the economic and political climate of the 1980s. Some exploratory observations are made about the legacy of the 1940s in the emerging current political debate about Australia's so-called ‘technological dependence’ and a renewed concern about strategic relationships among science, technology, productivity and national wealth.
Content
Author and article information
NOTES AND REFERENCES
Don Price, ‘The established dissenters’, Daedalus, 94, 1965, pp. 84–111; P. G. Werskey, ‘British scientists and ‘outsider’ politics, 1931–1945’, Science Studies, 1, January 1971, pp. 67–83.
Werskey G.. 1978. . The Visible College . , p. 233 London : : Allen Lane. .
Australian National University, Business and Labor Archives, E101A/1, AASW Constitution, adopted October 1940.
Roy Kay MacLeod. . 1974. . ‘The contradictions of professionalism: scientists, trade unionism and the First World War’. . Social Studies of Science . , Vol. 9:: 2
Roy and Kay MacLeod, ‘The social relations of science and technology, 1914–39’ in C.M. Cipolla (ed.), The Fontana Economic History of Europa, Vol. 5, Harvester Press, Sussex, 1977, p. 340.
D. P. Mellor, The Role of Science and Industry, Official History of Australia in the War of 1939–1945, Series 4, Vol. V, Australian War Memorial, Canberra, 1958, p. 57.
ibid., pp. 434–5.
AASW Bulletin, 25, March 1942, p. 3.
The urgency of developing anti-malarial drugs became particularly acute when the Japanese seized the Cinchona plantations of Java which then supplied some 95 per cent of the world's supply of quinine. Mellor, op. cit., p. 619.
Australian National University Archives, E101B/4, Correspondence Files, 11 August 1939.
ibid., E101A/6/5, recruitment pamphlet of AASW's Maribyrnong Branch. The quotation was taken verbatim from a memorandum issued by the British AScW, then known as the National Union of Scientific Workers, in 1918.
The NSW conference alone passed 50 resolutions. Among the most significant were the following: that a Parliamentary and Scientific Committee and a scientific manpower secretariat be established; that postgraduate courses in all branches of science be instituted at Australian universities; that institutes of technology be founded to forge links with industry; the necessity for “decentralization of our industrial system”; that more adequate and systematic statistical data “be made available for the use and guidance of those concerned with the planning of industry and economy”; proposals for a NSW agricultural science college and research station and for expansion of agricultural extension services and training of officers; proposals for a statesubsidised medical and dental service; immediate re-introduction of legislative controls over the manufacture, advertising and sales of patent medicines; increased national R&D funding, and improved research facilities.
R. O. Chalmers, private papers. AASW (NSW Division), Conference of Scientists on Planning of Science, Summary of Addresses, p. 9.
Lloyd Ross. . 1944. . “‘A new social order’. ”. In Post-War Reconstruction in Australia . , Edited by: Campbell D. A.S.. p. 218 Sydney : : Australasian Publishing Co.. .
Smith's Weekly, 10 October 1942.
Sir David Rivett, The Application of Science to Industry in Australia, The John Murtagh Macrossan Memorial Lecture for 1943, pamphlet, pp. 24 and 37.
AASW Bulletin, 65, August 1945, pp. 4–5.
Australian National University Archives, E101A/4, AASW Circular, Report of W.C. Wentworth's speech at June 1946 public meeting.
Hansard, Representatives, 7 March 1947, p. 487.
Australian National University Archives, E101A/4, undated memorandum, AASW Federal Council in reply to Abbott's statement, 7 March 1947, p. 2.
Hansard, Representatives, 30 September 1948, p. 1045.
ibid., p. 1097.
Australian Journal of Science, April 1949, p. 147.
A. Moyal, ‘The Australian Academy of Science: the anatomy of a scientific elite. Part I, Search, 11, 7/8, 1980, pp. 231–38; J. Ronayne, ‘Scientific research, science policy, and SSTS: a country report’, Social Studies of Science, 8, 1978, pp. 361–84.
Paul Gross, ‘Diversity and adaptability in science policy’, Search, 7, 3, 1976, pp. 89–92.
Canberra Times, 12, 13, 17 June 1975; Australian, 19 June 1975; and the Age, 1 July 1975.
Ronayne, op. cit., 1978.
Rubenstein C. L.. 1978. . ‘Changes in Australian science and technology policies’. . Australian Journal of Public Administration . , Vol. 37((3)): 233––56. . SearchCurrent Affairs BulletinFuture Tense? Technology in Australia
Amilcar Herrera. . 1973. . “‘Social determinants of science policy in Latin America’. ”. In Science Technology and Development . , Edited by: Cooper C.. p. 19––37. . London : : Frank Cass. . consumptionop. tit.
Ronayne, 1978, op. cit.; C. B. Schedvin, ‘The culture of CSIRO’, Australian Cultural History, 2, 1982/83.
Growing public concern over the effects of misdirected technology was not notably fostered by scientists. Unlike their British and American counterparts, the ‘social responsibility of science’ movement in the early 1970s did not make any significant inroad in Australia.
Towards Diversity and Adaptability, Report of the Royal Commission on Australian Government Administration by its Science Task Force, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1975; Technological Change in Australia, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Technological Change in Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1980.
ASTEC, Direct Funding of Basic Research, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1979, p. 11.
Department of Science and Technology, Science and Technology Statement 1980–81, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1982, Preface.
Australian Scientific Industry Association, High and New Technology Needs of Australian Industry, mimeo, February 1983.
Stuart Macdonald, ‘Faith, hope and disparity. An example of the public justification of public research, Search, 13, 11/12, 1983, p. 290.
Paul Wild, ‘Comments’, Search, 13, 11/12, 1983, p. 299; P. B. Carne, A commentary on ‘Faith, hope and disparity …”, and S. Macdonald, ‘Faith, hope and disparity - an apologia to CSIRO”, Search, 14, 1/2, 1983, pp. 36–41.
See, for example, J. Ronayne, ‘Anti-science and the politicisation of scientists’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 12, 3, 1976, pp. 119–23, and ‘Further thoughts on diversity and adaptability’, Minerva, 3, 1979, pp. 443–58; A. Moyal, ‘Science policy studies in Australia’, Politics, 16, 1, 1981, p. 122; Brian Martin, ‘The scientific straightjacket; the power structure of science and the suppression of environmental scholarship’, Ecologist, 12, 4, 1982, pp. 33–43, and ‘The naked experts’, Ecologist, 12, 4, 1982, pp. 149–57.
Reported Australian, 13 March 1983, p. 3.
Barry Jones, Sleepers Wake! Technology and the Future of Work, Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 1982, p. 221.
Johnston, op. cit., 1982, pp. 22–23.
For an incisive critique of the quest for technological sovereignty via the high technology strategy, see S. Macdonald, ‘The Low-Down on High-Technology Industry in Australia’, paper presented to ANU Public Affairs Conference, ‘Science Research in Australia: Who Benefits?’, Canberra, 23–24 June, 1983.