Elsevier

Cytotherapy

Volume 4, Issue 2, March 2002, Pages 137-145
Cytotherapy

Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy

https://doi.org/10.1080/146532402317381848Get rights and content

Background

We have previously reported that repeated cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT), can be supported by unmanipulated autologous PBPC. Here we investigate whether purified CD34+ cells, obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the Isolex 300i device, can support such therapy.

Methods

Twenty-nine consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer had PBPC mobilized and harvested following chemotherapy and G-CSF (10 μg/kg per day). Patients with > 4.0× 106/kg CD34+ cells in the apheresis product underwent CD34-selection using the Isolex 300i (v2.0) device. All cells collected were equally divided into three aliquots and cryopreserved. Patients who did not achieve this threshold had unmanipulated cells collected and stored. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and either ifosfamide (10 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2). It was intended for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e 1/3 for each cycle) and to compare hemopoietic recovery between patients receiving CD34- selected cells or unmanipulated cells.

Results

Thirteen of the 29 patients (45%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells to undergo CD34-selection. The remaining 16 patients underwent CD34-selection with a median purity of 84.3% (range: 16.3–96.1%) and yield of 34% (range: 1–60%). Fifteen of these patients proceeded to HDT and 42 of the planned 45 cycles were administered. Nine patients had all three HDT cycles supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (× 106/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (range: 0.04–3.01). Three of the 15 patients required infusion of ‘back-up’ unmanipulated cells because of delayed neutrophil recovery. Of the 13 patients whose PBPCs did not undergo CD34+ cell selection, 11 proceeded to HDT with a median of 3.2 × 106/kg (range: 2.0–4.4) unselected cells infused per cycle and 31 of 33 planned cycles were delivered. When hemopoietic recovery was compared between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n= 34) and unmanipulated cells (n = 31), there was a modest slowing in the patients receiving CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 × 109/L = 11 days versus 10 days (P = 0.0122) and platelets > 20 × 109/L = 14 days versus 13 days (P = 0.0009). No difference in recovery to 50 × 109/L was observed (P = 0.54).

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells are capable of supporting multiple cycles of HDT. However, we were unable to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells to perform this processing in 45% (13/29) of patients and further improvements in yield are required to overcome the modest delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery.

References (29)

  • L.B. To et al.

    Clinical applications of ex vivo expanded cells

    Cancer Res Ther Control

    (1998)
  • D.N. Haylock et al.

    Ex vivo expansion of human hemopoietic progenitors with cytokines

  • H.M. Prince et al.

    Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer

    Bone Marrow Transplant

    (1999)
  • H.M. Prince et al.

    Docetaxel effectively mobilizes peripheral blood CD34+ cells

    Bone Marrow Transplant

    (2000)
  • Cited by (10)

    • CD34<sup>+</sup> Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Selection of Bone Marrow Grafts for Autologous Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

      2007, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
      Citation Excerpt :

      The specific licensed use of the Isolex® device is for CD34+ selection of hematopoietic stem cells from autologous peripheral blood of patients with malignancies. The majority of published literature has described its use in processing peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts of patients with breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma [2,7-10]. CD34+-selected grafts have reproducibly resulted in acceptable neutrophil and platelet engraftment in these circumstances [1].

    • Recent Australian experience with hemopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion

      2007, Cytotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In brief, this study involved three cohorts of three patients with advanced breast cancer who received three repetitive cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) comprising CY (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (17 mg/m2) and then infusion with either unmanipulated and/or ex vivo-expanded cells. It had previously been demonstrated that this HDT regimen was extremely myelosuppressive [15, 16] and as such provided a ‘window of opportunity’ to test whether transfusion of ex vivo-expanded cells could abrogate the predictably severe cytopenia. In the first cohort (three patients), the first of three HDT cycles was supported by unmanipulated cells infused on day 0, and the second and third cycles were supported with ex vivo-expanded cells and unmanipulated PBPC, both infused on day 0.

    • Osteopontin, a key component of the hematopoietic stem cell niche and regulator of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells

      2005, Blood
      Citation Excerpt :

      Low-density BM cells were isolated from CB by discontinuous density centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque (1.077 g/mL; Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). A variation of the Dynal bead method for clinical scale selection of cells using the Isolex 300i (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch, Germany) was used for isolation of CD34+ cells.30 CB mononuclear cells were incubated with anti-CD34, washed, and exposed to Dynal anti–mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) beads to rosette CD34+ cells.

    • Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

      2004, Handbook of Pediatric Transfusion Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text