Next Article in Journal
Annuity Payments Can Increase Patient Access to Innovative Cell and Gene Therapies under England’s Net Budget Impact Test
Previous Article in Journal
Balanced Assessment Systems Revisited
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Towards a More Transparent HTA Process in Poland: New Polish HTA Methodological Guidelines

by
Krzysztof Lach
1,*,
Michal Dziwisz
1,
Cécile Rémuzat
2 and
Mondher Toumi
3
1
Department of Pricing & Reimbursement and Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Cracow, Poland
2
Department of Pricing & Reimbursement and Market Access, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France
3
Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Aix-Marseille Université, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5(1), 1355202; https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202
Submission received: 10 May 2017 / Revised: 1 January 2017 / Accepted: 10 July 2017 / Published: 26 July 2017

Abstract

Introduction: Health technology assessment (HTA) in Poland supports reimbursement decisions via the Polish HTA Agency (AOTMiT), whose guidelines were updated in 2016. Methods: We identified key changes introduced by the update and, before guideline publication, analysed discrepancies between AOTMiT assessments and the submitting marketing authorisation holders (MAHs) to elucidate the context of the update. We compared the clarity and detail of the new guidelines versus those of the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Results: The update specified more precise requirements for items such as indirect comparison or input data for economic modelling. Agency–MAH discrepancies relating to the subjects of the HTA update were found in 14.6% of published documents. The new Polish HTA guidelines were as clear and detailed as NICE’s on topics such as assessing quality of evidence and economic modelling, but were less informative when describing (for example) pairwise meta-analysis. Conclusions: The Polish HTA guidelines update demonstrates lessons learned from internal and external experiences. The new guidelines adhere more closely to UK HTA standards, being clearer and more informative. While the update is expected to reduce Agency–MAH discrepancies, there remain areas for development, such as providing templates to aid HTA submissions.
Keywords: health technology assessment; guideline; methods; Poland health technology assessment; guideline; methods; Poland

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lach, K.; Dziwisz, M.; Rémuzat, C.; Toumi, M. Towards a More Transparent HTA Process in Poland: New Polish HTA Methodological Guidelines. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2017, 5, 1355202. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202

AMA Style

Lach K, Dziwisz M, Rémuzat C, Toumi M. Towards a More Transparent HTA Process in Poland: New Polish HTA Methodological Guidelines. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2017; 5(1):1355202. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lach, Krzysztof, Michal Dziwisz, Cécile Rémuzat, and Mondher Toumi. 2017. "Towards a More Transparent HTA Process in Poland: New Polish HTA Methodological Guidelines" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 5, no. 1: 1355202. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2017.1355202

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop