Next Article in Journal
Establishing the Cost of Implementing a Performance-Based, Managed Entry Agreement for a Hypothetical CAR T-Cell Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Price and Access Implications of the Cost-Utility and Budget Impact Methodologies Applied by NICE in England and ICER in the US for a Novel Gene Therapy in Parkinson’s Disease
 
 
Journal of Market Access & Health Policy (JMAHP) is published by MDPI from Volume 12 Issue 1 (2024). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Taylor & Francis.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Systematic Review of Pharmacoeconomic Models for Schizophrenia

by
Junwen Zhou
1,*,
Aurélie Millier
2 and
Mondher Toumi
1
1
Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
2
Health Economics and Outcomes Research Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2018, 6(1), 1508272; https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272
Submission received: 14 May 2018 / Revised: 24 July 2018 / Accepted: 26 July 2018 / Published: 14 August 2018

Abstract

Background: Economic models are broadly used in the economic evaluation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Our objective was to summarize the structure of these models. Methods: Model-based economic evaluations of antipsychotics in schizophrenia were identified through Medline and Embase. General information was extracted including analysis type, model type, perspective, population, comparator, outcome, and timeframe. Model-specific structures for decision tree (DT), cohort- and patient-level Markov model (CLMM, PLMM), and discrete-event simulation (DES) models were extracted. Results: A screen of 1870 records identified 79 studies. These were mostly cost-utility analyses (n = 48) with CLMM (n = 32) or DT models (n = 29). They mostly applied payer perspective (n = 68), focused on general schizophrenia for relapse prevention (n = 73), compared pharmacotherapies as first-line (n = 71), and evaluated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (n = 40) with a 1-year (n = 32) or 5-year (n = 26) projection. DT models progressed with the branching points of response, relapse, discontinuation, and adherence. CLMM models transitioned between disease states, whereas PLMM models transitioned between adverse event states with/without disease state. DES models moved forward with times to remission, relapse, psychiatrist visit, and death. Conclusions: A pattern of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia was identified. More subtle structures and patient-level models are suggested for a future modelling exercise.
Keywords: schizophrenia; pharmacotherapy; antipsychotics; pharmacoeconomics; economic model; model structure schizophrenia; pharmacotherapy; antipsychotics; pharmacoeconomics; economic model; model structure

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, J.; Millier, A.; Toumi, M. Systematic Review of Pharmacoeconomic Models for Schizophrenia. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 2018, 6, 1508272. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272

AMA Style

Zhou J, Millier A, Toumi M. Systematic Review of Pharmacoeconomic Models for Schizophrenia. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. 2018; 6(1):1508272. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Junwen, Aurélie Millier, and Mondher Toumi. 2018. "Systematic Review of Pharmacoeconomic Models for Schizophrenia" Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 6, no. 1: 1508272. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1508272

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop