Abstract

The rapid decline in the number of strong Lyα emitting galaxiesat z > 6 provides evidence for neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium, but is difficult to explain with plausible models for reionization. We demonstrate that the observed reduction in Lyα flux from galaxies at z > 6 can be explained by evolution in the escape fraction of ionizing photons, fesc. We find that the median observed drop in the fraction of galaxies showing strong Lyα emission, as well as the observed evolution of the Lyα luminosity function both follow from a small increase in fesc of Δfesc ∼ 0.1 from fesc ∼ 0.6 at z ∼ 6. This high escape fraction may be at odds with current constraints on the ionizing photon escape fraction, which favour smaller values of fesc ≲ 20 per cent. However, models that invoke a redshift evolution of fesc that is consistent with these constraints can suppress the z ∼ 7 Lyα flux to the observed level, if they also include a small evolution in global neutral fraction of Δ xH i ∼ 0.2. Thus, an evolving escape fraction of ionizing photons can be a plausible part of the explanation for evolution in the Lyα emission of high-redshift galaxies. More generally, our analysis also shows that the drop in the Lyα fraction is quantitatively consistent with the observed evolution in the Lyα luminosity functions of Lyα emitters.

1 INTRODUCTION

Observations of Lyα emitting galaxies are often interpreted to indicate that the intergalactic medium (IGM) is more opaque to Lyα photons at |$z$| > 6, than at lower redshifts. In particular, while the Lyα luminosity function (LF) of Lyα selected galaxies (LAE) remains constant at |$z=3{\rm -}6$| (e.g. Hu, Cowie & McMahon 1998; Ouchi et al. 2008), it is observed to drop rapidly at |$z$| > 6 (Kashikawa et al. 2006; Ouchi et al. 2010; Clément et al. 2012). Since their rest-frame UV-LFs do not exhibit the same evolution (Kashikawa et al. 2006), this reduction in the Lyα LF at |$z$| > 6 is likely caused by a reduction in the observed Lyα flux from these galaxies. Moreover, the so-called Lyα fraction – which denotes the fraction of galaxies selected via the drop-out technique that exhibit strong Lyα emission lines – increases between |$z$| = 3 and 6 (Stark et al. 2010; Stark, Ellis & Ouchi 2011), but then drops at |$z$| > 6 (Fontana et al. 2010; Pentericci et al. 2011; Caruana et al. 2012, 2013; Ono et al. 2012; Schenker et al. 2012; Treu et al. 2012, 2013).

The observed reduction in Lyα flux from galaxies at |$z$| > 6 is most readily explained by having additional intervening neutral atomic hydrogen, which is opaque to the Lyα flux, but not to the (non-ionizing) UV-continuum. This additional neutral atomic hydrogen is likely present naturally at |$z$| > 6 when reionization has not been completed. Indeed, it has been predicted that the end of reionization should coincide with a reduction in the observed Lyα flux from galaxies (e.g. Haiman & Spaans 1999).

Reionization was likely an inhomogeneous process in which fully ionized ‘bubbles’ were separated by neutral intergalactic gas (Furlanetto, Zaldarriaga & Hernquist 2004; McQuinn et al. 2007a). In this scenario, the progress of reionization is regulated by the growth of percolating H ii bubbles. The final stages of reionization are characterized by the presence of large bubbles, whose individual sizes exceeded tens of cMpc (e.g. Zahn et al. 2011). The majority of the galaxies we can detect with existing instruments preferentially resided inside large H ii bubbles. Their Lyα photons would have been able to travel a significant distance before entering the neutral IGM, and redshift out of the Lyα resonance due to the Hubble expansion, which would facilitate their subsequent transmission through the neutral IGM (Miralda-Escude 1998; Santos 2004; Cen, Haiman & Mesinger 2005; McQuinn et al. 2007b; Mesinger & Furlanetto 2008).

Because of this effect, it is difficult to interpret the observed reduction of Lyα flux from galaxies at |$z$| > 6 in the context of inhomogeneous reionization models, since the imprint of the neutral IGM on the detectability of Lyα emission from galaxies is found to be subtle. For example, Dijkstra, Mesinger & Wyithe (2011) showed that the observed drop in the Lyα fraction at |$z$| > 6 requires a change in the volume averaged neutral fraction of hydrogen of |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}} \sim 0.5$| (also see Jensen et al. 2013, but see Taylor & Lidz 2013 who caution that the required change can be reduced when effects of galaxy sample variance are accounted for), which is consistent with earlier constraints on this quantity by McQuinn et al. (2007b) and Mesinger & Furlanetto (2008) from modelling the Lyα LFs. As was pointed out by Dijkstra et al. (2011), this required rapid evolution of |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}} \sim 0.5$| over such a short time is extreme.1

To alleviate this tension, Bolton & Haehnelt (2013) recently showed that the required |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$| may be reduced significantly by Lyman limit systems (LLSs, self-shielding clouds with |$N_{\rm H\,\small {I}}> 10^{17}$| cm−2), whose number density may evolve rapidly at the end of reionization (although this rise is slowed down when recombinations in the IGM are taken into account, see Sobacchi & Mesinger 2014). Similarly, the opacity of residual H i in the ionized IGM can increase by as much as ∼30 per cent between |$z$| = 5.7 and 6.5 (Dijkstra, Wyithe & Haiman 2007b; Laursen, Sommer-Larsen & Razoumov 2011). However, these models also predict that the IGM transmits low fraction of Lyα photons, |$T_{\rm IGM}=0.1{\rm -}0.3$|. This is lower than current observational constraints on this quantity, which is likely related the impact of galactic winds on the Lyα line shape emerging from galaxies (Dijkstra & Jeeson-Daniel 2013). In any case, these possibilities will need to be explored and quantified further in future work.

Lyα emission is powered by recombination following photoionization inside H ii regions. The Lyα luminosity of a galaxy, Lα, is therefore proportional to the total number of ionizing photons that do not escape from galaxies, i.e. |$L_{\alpha } \propto (1-f_{\rm esc})\dot{N}_{\rm ion}$|, where fesc denotes the escape fraction of ionizing photons. Thus, having fesc increase between |$z$| = 6 and 7 will reduce the Lyα luminosity of galaxies as observed. We expect this effect to be especially strong when fesc is large. For example, the intrinsic Lyα luminosity Lα doubles when fesc = 0.8 → 0.9, while there is little impact when fesc = 0.1 → 0.2.

Modelling fesc and its redshift dependence from first principles requires properly resolving the multiphase structure of the interstellar medium (ISM; see e.g. Fernandez & Shull 2011), and the small spatial scales that are relevant for the transport of ionizing radiation in high-density gas (e.g. Rahmati et al. 2013). Direct observational constraints on the escape fraction, and its redshift dependence are still highly uncertain. However, there are several lines of indirect evidence that fesc increases with redshift. Measurements of the redshift dependence of the photoionization rate of the Lyα forest in combination with the observed redshift evolution of the UV-LF of drop-out galaxies, suggest that fesc increases quite rapidly with redshift at |$z$| ≳ 4 (e.g. Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère 2012; Mitra, Ferrara & Choudhury 2013, also see Inoue, Iwata & Deharveng 2006). Moreover, the covering factor of low-ionization absorbers in drop-out galaxies has been observed to increase from |$z$| = 3 to 4, which provides independent evidence that fesc is increasing with redshift (Jones, Stark & Ellis 2012; Jones et al. 2013). This inferred redshift evolution could reflect e.g. (i) an evolution of the UV-emissivity per unit gas mass, (ii) an evolution in the clumpiness in the ISM of high-|$z$| galaxies which affects the covering factor of high column density gas (Fernandez & Shull 2011), and/or (iii) an evolution in the fraction of stars formed in low-mass haloes which can efficiently ‘self-ionize’ (e.g. Ferrara & Loeb 2013).

The goal of this paper is to explore the impact of an increasing escape fraction on the visibility of the Lyα emission line from galaxies at |$z$| > 6. We stress the purpose of our paper is a proof-of-concept, and that a systematic study will be performed in future work. The outline is as follows: we describe our model in Section 2, present our results in Section 3. We discuss our results in Section 4 and present our conclusions in Section 5.

2 THE MODEL

2.1 The EW-PDF and its redshift evolution

The strength of the Lyα line emerging from galaxies is regulated by several physical processes: (i) The amount of Lyα that is produced, which depends on the initial mass function, stellar metallicity (e.g. Schaerer 2003) and fesc; (ii) the amount of Lyα that escapes from the (dusty) ISM of galaxies, which is correlated with the dust content of galaxies (Atek et al. 2009; Kornei et al. 2010; Hayes et al. 2011); and (iii) the amount of Lyα that is scattered in the intergalactic/circum galactic medium. The Lyα line strength relative to the non-ionizing UV-continuum is quantified by the (rest-frame) equivalent width EW, i.e. EW|$\equiv \frac{L_{\alpha }}{L_{\rm c}(\lambda _{\rm UV})}$|, where LcUV) denotes the luminosity density of the continuum at λUV = 1300–1600 Å. The Lyα emitting properties of a collection of galaxies can be quantified by the (cumulative) EW-distribution function (PDF), denoted with P(EW).

All processes listed above leave their imprint on the observed EW-PDF, and its redshift evolution. In particular, the EW-PDF evolves towards larger EWs from |$z$| = 3 to 6 (Stark et al. 2010), which can most easily be attributed to a decreasing dust content of galaxies in this redshift range (Hayes et al. 2011). Moreover, since the opacity of the IGM is expected to increase over the same redshift interval (and which would thus reduce the EW-PDF towards higher |$z$|), its impact appears subdominant to that of dust. However, the average2 dust content of galaxies keeps decreasing at |$z$| > 6 (e.g. Bouwens et al. 2012b; Finkelstein et al. 2012a), and we would expect the EW-PDF to keep increasing. This is not what has been observed, and it becomes natural to search for alternative explanations for this sudden reduction in the EW-PDF at |$z$| > 6. Suppression of the Lyα line by neutral intergalactic gas is a natural explanation, as there exist other observational indications for the presence of neutral intergalactic gas at |$z$| > 6 (e.g. in quasar absorption line spectra, see Wyithe & Loeb 2004; Mesinger & Haiman 2007; Bolton et al. 2011).

Previous models (e.g. Dijkstra et al. 2011; Bolton & Haehnelt 2013; Jensen et al. 2013) have explored this possibility quantitatively, and assumed that the EW-PDF at |$z$| = 7 only differs from the one measured at |$z$| = 6 due to the intervening neutral IGM. Under this assumption, we have EW7 = EW|$_6\times \mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,7}/\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,6}$|, where |$\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,x}$| corresponds to the IGM transmission fraction at redshift |$z$| = x. We can then derive the EW-PDF at |$z$| = 7 from the one observed at |$z$| = 6 simply from3|$P_7({\rm EW}) \propto P_6({\rm EW}\times \mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,6}/\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,7})$|. Because it is difficult to explain the observed |$z$|-evolution with reionization alone (see Section 1), we perform a similar analysis which includes a redshift escape fraction in this paper, as is discussed in more detail next.

2.2 The redshift evolution of the EW-PDF with fesc(z)

To incorporate the impact of fesc, we first introduce the distribution P0(EW) which denotes the EW-PDF, if the escape fraction of ionizing photons at |$z$| = 6 were fesc = 0. This model maximizes the produced Lyα luminosity/EW for a given IMF and stellar metallicity. We assume that P0(EW) is an exponential function at EW > 0 with a scalelength EW0, zero otherwise. We next assume that galaxies have a distribution of fesc, which we denote with4p(fesc). In this case, we have
\begin{equation} P_x({\rm EW}) \propto \int P_0({\rm EW}/[1-f_{\rm esc}])p_{\rm x}(f_{\rm esc}){\rm d}f_{\rm esc}, \end{equation}
(1)
where px(fesc) denotes the differential distribution of fesc, and where Px(EW) denotes the cumulative distribution of EW at redshift |$z$| = x. We assume that px(fesc) is Gaussian when 0 ≤ fesc ≤ 1, and zero otherwise. We denote the mean, or expectation value, of fesc with |$\langle f_{\rm esc} \rangle \equiv \int _0^1 {\rm d}f_{\rm esc} f_{\rm esc} p(f_{\rm esc})$|. For a given px(fesc), we constrain the scalelength EW0 by comparing to the observed Px(EW). We point out that the expression for Px(EW) in equation (1) is a weighted sum of exponential functions with different scalelengths. The final function is therefore generally not an exponential function, which differs from previous analyses (as in Dijkstra et al. 2011; Bolton & Haehnelt 2013; Jensen et al. 2013). In our analysis, we make the following additional assumptions:
  • fesc at a fixed |$z$| is the same for all galaxies: i.e. fesc does not depend on MUV. As discussed in Section 4.1, this assumption is likely unrealistic. However, the precise MUV-dependence of fesc is still poorly constrained. Instead of including this possible dependence in our models, we opt to study simpler models, which can provide a baseline for more complex future models that include this effect. Moreover, the range of UV-luminosities of the galaxies we are modelling is still limited, and the impact of fesc depending on MUV does not affect our main results.

  • First, we assume that the EW-PDF at |$z$| = 7 differs only from the one at |$z$| = 6 due to the change in the escape fraction of ionizing photons, fesc (see Section 2.1 for a motivation of this assumption). We present our results on this analysis in Section 3. We discuss how our analysis is modified if we assume that the EW-PDF evolves at |$z$| > 6 as a result of a joint evolution in fesc(|$z$|) and reionization in Section 2.3. We generally present our results in terms of the expectation values 〈fesc, 7〉 ≡ 〈fesc, 6〉 + Δ〈fesc〉 ≤ 1. We point out that the large impact on the redshift evolution in P(EW) for large 〈fesc, 6〉 at fixed Δ〈fesc〉 (as mentioned in Section 1) arises because fesc appears as (1 − fesc)−1 in the argument of P0(EW) in equation (1), which increases rapidly when fesc → 1.

  • Our analysis implicitly assumes that the |$z$|-evolution of fesc does not affect the |$z$|-evolution of other quantities: e.g. increasing the escape fraction does not increase (i) the fraction of Lyα photons that are transmitted through the IGM, or (ii) the fraction of Lyα photons that can escape from the dusty ISM of galaxies. As we argue in Section 4.3, (i) is reasonable, while (ii) presents a limitation of the model, but may help explain why the redshift evolution of the escape fraction may only have noticeable effects on the visibility of the Lyα line at |$z$| > 6.

2.3 The redshift evolution of the EW-PDF with fesc(z) and xH i(z)

If we add the effect of an (modest) evolution in reionization together with a modest evolution in fesc, then we can achieve a larger drop in the Lyα fraction. The additional impact of reionization on the EW-PDF can be incorporated as5
\begin{eqnarray} P_x({\rm EW}) &\propto &\int {\rm d}\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}\ p_{\rm x}(\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}) \nonumber\\ &&\times \int P_0({\rm EW}/[1-f_{\rm esc}]\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})p_{\rm x}(f_{\rm esc})\,{\rm d}f_{\rm esc}, \end{eqnarray}
(2)
where |$p(\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})$| denotes the |$\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}$|-PDF. Computing this PDF was the prime focus of the analysis described in Dijkstra et al. (2011), who combined galactic outflow models with large-scale semi-numeric simulations of reionization.

Following Dijkstra et al. (2011), we model the impact of the galactic outflow on the Lyα photons emerging from the galaxy using spherical shell models. For the analysis in this paper, we used shells with |$N_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=10^{20}$| cm−2 and wind velocities of |$v$|wind = 25 km s−1. For a more detailed discussion on these models, the reader is referred to Dijkstra & Wyithe (2010) and Dijkstra et al. (2011). We simulate inhomogeneous reionization at |$z$| = 7 with the publicly available, semi-numerical code dexm (Mesinger & Furlanetto 2007; http://homepage.sns.it/mesinger/Sim). dexm combines excursion set and perturbation formalisms to generate various cosmic fields, and has been extensively tested against numerical simulations (Mesinger & Furlanetto 2007; Mesinger, Furlanetto & Cen 2011; Zahn et al. 2011). Our simulation box is 200 Mpc on a side with a resolution of 5003. We resolve haloes down to a minimum mass of |$M_{{\rm min}}\gtrsim 5\times 10^8\, {\rm M}_{\odot}$|, consistent with the expected cooling threshold at |$z$| ∼ 7 (Sobacchi & Mesinger 2013). The simulations present minor modifications of those used in Dijkstra et al. (2011, specifically the simulated redshift has been changed for the problem at hand, and the minimum mass has been increased by a factor of ∼5 to account for photoionization feedback). These modified simulations will be described in detail in a subsequent work, Mesinger et al., in preparation. We note that the new |$p(\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})$| look very similar to those we obtained with the original simulations that were used in Dijkstra et al. (2011).

3 RESULTS

3.1 Evolution in the Lyα fraction from redshift evolution in fesc(z)

Fig. 1 shows cumulative Lyα EW-PDFs of drop-out galaxies with −20.25 < MUV < −18.75 (left-hand panel) and −21.75 < MUV < −20.25 (right-hand panel). The black squares (red filled circles) represent data points at |$z$| = 6 (|$z$| = 7) from the compilation by Ono et al. (2012). This figure also shows an example of a model in which the observed redshift evolution of the Lyα EW-PDF can be mimicked completely with a redshift-dependent fesc(|$z$|).

Figure 1.

This figure shows cumulative Lyα EW distributions for a sample of UV-faint (left-hand panel) and UV-bright (right-hand panel) drop-out selected galaxies. Black filled squares/red filled circles represent observations at |$z$| ∼ 6 /|$z$| ∼ 7 (taken from Ono et al. 2012). The black solid line represents a models at |$z$| = 6 assuming (i) that p6(fesc) is a Gaussian with σ = 0.3 and 〈fesc〉 = 0.65, and that (ii) P0(EW) ∝ exp [− EW/EW0]. Here, we took EW0 = 110 Å/EW0 = 55 Å to match the UV-faint/UV-bright data. Red dotted lines represent predictions if we only modify P7(EW) such that Δ〈fesc〉 = 0.1 (i.e. 〈fesc〉 = 0.75). This figure illustrates that it is possible to explain the observed drop in Lyα fraction completely with a modest increase in fesc, the escape fraction of ionizing photons, provided that fesc for LAE is already high at |$z$| ≈ 6.

Figure 2.

This figure compares predicted Lyα LFs to observations at |$z$| = 5.7 (blue filled circles, taken from Ouchi et al. 2008), at 6.5 ( red filled squares, taken from Ouchi et al. 2010) and |$z$| = 7.0 (green diamonds, taken from Ota et al. 2010). The black solid line represents our model at |$z$| = 5.7 which uses the |$z$| = 6 EW-PDF shown as the black solid in the left-hand panel of Fig. 1. The blue and red dotted lines represent predicted LFs at |$z$| = 6.5 and 7.0 when we assume the same redshift evolution in fesc as in Fig. 1. The blue and red dashed lines assume no evolution in the Lyα EW-PDFs (see the text). This figure shows that the model that reproduced the observed drop in the Lyα fraction (shown in Fig. 1), also naturally reproduces the observed evolution in the Lyα LFs of LAEs.

The black solid line in the left-hand panel shows a model EW-PDF at |$z$| = 6 which assumes (i) that p6(fesc) is Gaussian with a standard deviation σ = 0.3 and 〈fesc〉 = 0.65, and that (ii) P0(EW) ∝ exp [− EW/EW0], where we took EW0 = 110 Å to match the |$z$| = 6 data. These model parameters were chosen to quantitatively illustrate our main point.6 The black solid line shown in the right-hand panel represents the same model, but with EW0 = 55 Å. This reduced value7 of EW0 reflects that the Lyα fraction decreases towards brighter MUV.

The red dotted lines represent a model in which we only modified P7(EW) such that 〈fesc, 7〉 = 0.75, i.e. Δ〈fesc〉 = 0.1. This model can fully explain the observed reduction of the Lyα EW-PDF and the drop in the Lyα fraction.

3.2 Evolution in the LFs from redshift evolution in fesc(z)

We also show the impact of a changing fesc on the Lyα LF of Lyα emitters (LAEs). For this exercise, we follow the procedure of Dijkstra & Wyithe (2012), who constructed Lyα LFs by combining observed UV-LFs of drop-out selected galaxies with observed Lyα equivalent width distributions. Dijkstra & Wyithe (2012) found that this procedure reproduces observed LFs of LAEs well following inclusion of a rescaling by a factor of F = 0.5 (for a detailed discussion we refer the interested reader to Dijkstra & Wyithe 2012). Importantly, the redshift evolution of the LFs of LAEs was reproduced well at all redshifts |$z$| ≳ 3, which is important for the analysis presented here.

The differential Lyα LF, denoted by |$\frac{{\rm d}n}{{\rm d}\log L_{\alpha }}{\rm d}\log L_{\alpha }$|, measures the comoving number density of galaxies with (the logarithm of their) Lyα luminosities in the range |$\log L_{\alpha } \pm {\rm d}\log L_{\alpha }/2$|, and is given by
\begin{eqnarray*} \nonumber \frac{\rm{d}n}{\rm{d}\log L_{\alpha }}=F\int _{M_{\rm min}}^{M_{\rm max}}{\rm d}M_{\rm uv}{\phi (M_{\rm UV},z)}{\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d} \log L_{\alpha }}(M_{\rm uv},z)}. \end{eqnarray*}
Here, |$\phi (M_{\rm UV}){\rm d}M_{\rm UV}$| denotes the comoving number density of drop-out selected galaxies with absolute magnitudes in the range |$M_{\rm UV} \pm {\rm d}M_{\rm UV}/2$|, for which we adopted the Schechter function parametrization given by table 1 in Bouwens et al. (2012a). The distribution of Lyα luminosity is |$\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d} \log L_{\alpha }}(M_{\rm uv})=\ln 10\times {\rm EW}\times \frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}{\rm EW}}(M_{\rm UV})$|. Finally, we have F = 0.5 (as mentioned above). Equation (3) therefore allows us to compute the redshift evolution in the Lyα LF due to both evolution in the UV-LF of drop-out galaxies, and the redshift evolution of |$\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}{\rm EW}}$| (i.e. the Lyα fraction).

Fig. 2 shows the predicted Lyα LF at |$z$| = 5.7 as the black solid line, where we assumed that |$\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}{\rm EW}}(z=5.7)=\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}{\rm EW}}(z=6.0)$|, and we adopted the |$\frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}{\rm EW}}(z=6.0)$| shown in the left-hand panel of Fig. 1 (i.e. the EW-PDF that described the UV-faint population of drop-out galaxies).8 The model LF fits the observations of Ouchi et al. (2008; blue filled circles) well. The red lines show the predicted LFs at |$z$| = 6.5. The dashed red line assumes that the EW-PDF at |$z$| = 6.5 is the same as at |$z$| = 6, while the dotted red line assumes that fesc evolved from 〈fesc〉 = 0.65 at |$z$| = 6 to 〈fesc〉 = 0.70 at |$z$| = 6.5 (i.e. this corresponds to the model shown in Fig. 1 and we assumed that |$\frac{\rm{d}\langle f_{\rm esc}\rangle }{\rm{d}z}=0.1$| and 〈fesc, 6〉 = 0.65). The data at |$z$| = 6.5 (red filled squares, taken from Ouchi et al. 2010) does not favour any of the models significantly. The blue lines show the predicted LFs at |$z$| = 7.0, where the dotted line shows a model in which the fesc evolved to 〈fesc, 7〉 = 0.75 at |$z$| = 7.0. This model lies much closer to the observations of Ota et al. (2010, green diamonds) than the model which keeps fesc constant. Thus, evolution in the escape fraction of ionizing photons simultaneously explains the observed drop in the Lyα fraction between |$z$| = 6 and 7, and the observed evolution in the Lyα LFs within the same redshift range. More generally, our analysis shows that the drop in the Lyα fraction is quantitatively consistent with the observed evolution in the Lyα LFs of LAEs.

3.3 Evolution in the Lyα fraction from joint redshift evolution in fesc(z) and xH i

The previous section illustrated that a small evolution in fesc from a value of 〈fesc, 6〉 = 0.65 is sufficient to explain the observed decrease in the LAE LF and the fraction of strong Lyα emitting galaxies. However, this high escape fraction may be at odds with constraints obtained from the measurements of the Thomson optical depth to the cosmic microwave background, the photoionization rate of the Lyα forest, and the observed redshift evolution of the UV-LF of drop-out galaxies, which jointly favour values of fesc, 6 ∼ 10–20 per cent (Inoue et al. 2006; Wyithe et al. 2010; Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère 2012; Becker & Bolton 2013; Robertson et al. 2013; also see Finkelstein et al. 2012b). While these estimates rely on uncertain extrapolations9 of the luminosity density in low-luminosity galaxies (and towards higher redshifts), the first direct constraints on fesc in LAEs have recently been reported by Ono et al. (2010) who found fesc, 6 ≲ 0.6 (1 − σ).

Thus, the escape fraction evolution is unlikely to fully explain the observed drop in the Lyα fractions. We therefore examine the specific case in which fesc evolves as fesc(|$z$|) = f0([1 + |$z$|]/5)κ (as in Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère 2012, also see Becker & Bolton 2013), and adopt κ = 4 and f0 = 0.04 (which is consistent with observations, see Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère 2012).10 For f0 = 0.04, we have fesc = 0.15 at |$z$| = 6 and fesc = 0.26 at |$z$| = 7. While this model predicts that Δ〈fesc〉 ∼ 0.1, it does not suffice to fully explain the observed evolution of the EW-PDF. This is due to the smaller value of 〈fesc, 6〉 than what we assumed previously, which gives rise to a weaker impact on the redshift evolution of the EW-PDF (see Sections 1 and 2).

In Fig. 3, we show the cumulative Lyα EW distribution for UV-faint drop-out selected galaxies only (see Fig. 1 for a description of the lines and data points; the following results are quantitatively the same for the UV-bright galaxies). The black solid line now represents a model in which (i) P6(fesc) is a Gaussian with 〈fesc, 6〉 = 0.15 and σ = 0.3, and (ii) P0(EW) ∝ exp [− EW/EW0], where EW0 = 55 Å (note that it was11 EW0 = 110 Å in the model studied in Section 3 for the UV-faint sample). The red dotted lines show the predicted changes in the EW-PDF under the assumption that the drop is entirely due to a changing ionization state of the IGM (as in Dijkstra et al. 2011; Jensen et al. 2013).12 The upper/lower red dotted line corresponds to |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.2$|/|$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.5$|. The blue dashed line represents a model in which Δ〈fesc〉 = 0.11 in addition to having |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.2$|. This model is virtually indistinguishable from the model with |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.5$| and no evolution in fesc. Thus, extrapolation of the observed evolution in fesc is equivalent to having an additional |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.3$| between |$z$| = 6 and 7 in effecting the properties of Lyα flux and EW.

Figure 3.

This figure shows the cumulative Lyα EW distribution for UV-faint drop-out selected galaxies (see Fig. 1 for a description of the lines and data points, and the text for details on the models). Here, the upper/lower red dotted line represents a model in which we modify the EW-PDF by having the IGM opacity increase due to an increase in the globally averaged neutral fraction, |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.17$|/|$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.5$|. The dashed blue lines represents a model in which in addition fesc evolves as fesc(|$z$|) = 0.04([1 + |$z$|]/5)4 in addition to having |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.17$|. This figure shows that mild evolution in both |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$| and fesc can mimic a more rapid evolution in |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$| and thus explain the observed drop in Lyα fractions. The grey solid lines show predictions if we extrapolated the redshift evolution of fesc to |$z$| = 8, while also changing the globally averaged neutral fraction to |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.3$|. This prediction is still at odds with recently inferred fraction at |$z$| = 8 by Treu et al. (2013, represented by the upper limit at EW = 25 Å). The models can be made more consistent with this upper limit if we shift the predicted EW-PDFs by ΔEW= −25 Å (shown by the grey dotted line, see the text).

The grey solid line represents the model in which the redshift evolution in fesc is extrapolated to |$z$| = 8. In this model, we additionally assume that the globally averaged neutral fraction, |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$|, has evolved further to |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}=0.3$|. Fig. 3 shows that an evolving fesc(|$z$|) has a dramatic impact on the predicted Lyα fraction at |$z$| = 8. However, even these models do not reproduce the recently inferred Lyα fraction at |$z$| = 8 by Treu et al. (2013; represented by the upper limit at EW=25 Å). This ‘failure’ can be partially remedied by requiring that |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}} \gg 0.3$| at |$z$| = 8, which would again require a very rapid evolution in |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$|. It may also be related to the fact that our models assume that all drop-out galaxies have a Lyα emission line with EW > 0, i.e. that P0(EW > 0) = 1. While this assumption is consistent with observations of drop-out galaxies at |$z$| = 6, the observational uncertainties allow us to relax this assumption and shift the intrinsic distribution by, say, ΔEW=−25 Å, which would imply that P0(EW > 0) < 1 as observed in |$z$| ∼ 3 drop-out galaxies (Shapley et al. 2003). While the escape fraction of Lyα photons increases with redshift, it is unclear whether P0(EW > 0) = 1 at |$z$| ≥ 6. If we apply a shift of ΔEW=−25 Å to the predictions at |$z$| = 8, then our model predictions lie much closer to the upper limit at |$z$| = 8 (as shown by the grey dotted line).

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 A mass/luminosity-dependent fesc(z)?

A caveat is that the observationally inferred redshift evolution of fesc adopted in Section 3.3, refers to an average over the entire galaxy population. It has been argued that the inferred redshift evolution may be driven by a mass and/or luminosity dependence of the escape fraction (Alvarez et al. 2012; Ferrara & Loeb 2013). In this scenario, fesc decreases towards higher masses and/or luminosities, and the population averaged escape fraction reflects the redshift evolution of the luminosity and/or mass functions. Support for the mass and/or luminosity dependence of the escape fraction is provided by the observationally inferred escape fraction of LAEs at |$z$| = 3 of |$f_{\rm esc}\sim 0.1{\rm -}0.3$|, which is significantly higher than the inferred fraction for the more massive LBGs where fesc ∼ 0.05 (e.g. Iwata et al. 2009; Nestor et al. 2011).

This suggests that assuming a uniform fesc(|$z$|) is not realistic. However, the higher inferred escape fraction of LAEs at |$z$| = 3 of |$f_{\rm esc}(z=3)\sim 0.1{\rm -}0.3$| may imply that we need a less rapid evolution in fesc(|$z$|) to have a significant impact on the redshift evolution of the Lyα fraction: we showed that Δ〈fesc〉 = 0.1 can either help explain the observed drop in the Lyα fraction between |$z$| = 6 and 7 if 〈fesc, 6〉 = 0.15, or explain the complete evolution when 〈fesc, 6〉 = 0.15. If fesc(|$z$|) increases continuously between |$z$| = 3 and 6, then 〈fesc, 6〉 may be large enough that only a small additional change may have a significant impact. As mentioned in Section 1, the decreasing covering factor of low-ionization absorption lines with redshift does suggest that escape fraction increases with redshift for a fixed galaxy population (Jones et al. 2012, 2013).

4.2 Lyα transport and escape, and a bimodal p(fesc)

The observed Lyα flux of a galaxy not only depends on fesc, but also on the effective escape fraction of Lyα photons from the galaxies to the observer, |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$|. Thus, we have |$L_{\alpha } \propto f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}(1-f_{\rm esc})$|. The effective escape fraction |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$| includes the fraction of Lyα photons that escape from the ISM of galaxies, but also the fraction that is subsequently transmitted through the IGM (e.g. Dijkstra & Jeeson-Daniel 2013). Both of these processes may depend on the value of fesc, i.e. |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}= f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}(f_{\rm esc})$| (see discussion in Section 4.3).

The escape of Lyα photons from a dusty ISM, for example, is a complex process which depends on the dust content of the ISM, as well as its kinematics (e.g. Atek et al. 2008; Hayes et al. 2011). Irrespective of these complexities, the escape of ionizing photons requires low column density (|$N_{\rm H\,\small {I}} {<} 10^{17}$| cm−2) sightlines out of the galaxy. If these low H i-column density paths are surrounded by higher column density sightlines which are opaque to ionizing photons (as in the ‘blow-out’ model proposed by Nestor et al. 2011), then we may expect Lyα photons to scatter and preferentially escape along these same paths (see Behrens, Dijkstra & Niemeyer 2014 for a more detailed investigation of this effect). This can introduce a correlation between the escape fractions of Lyα and ionizing photons. In the most extreme case, individual galaxies would have a bimodal distribution for p(fesc) which contains peaks at fesc = 0 and 1. Interestingly, there is observational support for such a bimodality in observations of star forming galaxies, which indicate that a small fraction has a large fesc, while a large fraction practically has fesc = 0 (Shapley et al. 2006; Nestor et al. 2011; Vanzella et al. 2012). However, even in this scenario it is the escape fraction averaged13 over all sightlines, |$f^{\Omega }_{\rm esc}$|, that is relevant for powering nebular emission (and also for reionizing the Universe). The models described in this paper therefore also describe a scenario in which |$f^{\Omega }_{\rm esc}$| is distributed as a Gaussian.

It is nevertheless good to keep in mind that our scenario does not describe the more extreme situation in which |$f^{\Omega }_{\rm esc}$| has a bimodal distribution, i.e. it does not describe a scenario in which some galaxies have fesc ≫ 0 while others have fesc = 0 in all directions. In this scenario – which appears to be at odds with observed covering factors of low-ionization absorption line systems in drop-out galaxies, which are typically <1 (see e.g. Heckman et al. 2011; Jones et al. 2013) – an increase in fesc(|$z$|) with |$z$| translates to an increase in the fraction of galaxies with fesc ≫ 0. This would also reduce the fraction of star-forming galaxies that produce Lyα photons. However, the overall reduction in the number density of LAEs would be weaker than in our models.

4.3 Dependence of |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$| on fesc

The discussion above shows that the effective escape fraction of Lyα photons can depend on fesc (and therefore possibly on MUV as in Forero-Romero et al. 2012). If ionizing photons escape anisotropically, then so do Lyα photons. However, the first calculations of this effect have been reported only recently (Behrens et al. 2014). The precise correlation this may introduce between fesc and |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$| is complex (it depends e.g. on the geometry of the low column density holes, outflow properties), and has therefore not been quantified yet. If we assume for simplicity that |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly} \propto f_{\rm esc}^y$|, then we expect the observed Lyα luminosity to increase with fesc until |$f_{\rm esc,pk}=\frac{y}{y+1}$|, after which it decreases.

The correlation between |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$| and fesc likely originates mostly at the ISM-level: subsequent resonant scattering in the IGM occurs off residual H i, whose number density is affected by the value of fesc (see e.g. Haardt & Madau 2012 and fig. 4 of Dijkstra, Lidz & Wyithe 2007a, for how this affects the IGM opacity). However, resonant scattering in the IGM depends sensitively on the assumed Lyα spectral line profile. Scattering off H i in galactic outflows typically redshifts the Lyα photons out of resonance as they escape from the galaxy, which strongly reduces the importance of resonant scattering in the IGM (see fig. 1 and the discussion in section 3.1 of Dijkstra et al. 2011). Ignoring the dependence of the IGM transmission on fesc is therefore reasonable.

In short, ignoring a plausible correlation between |$f^{\rm eff}_{\rm esc,Ly}$| and fesc is a shortcoming of the model that will need to be addressed in future work. Interestingly, it may help us explain why a monotonously evolving fesc can give rise to a non-monotonic redshift dependence of the Lyα fraction, with a turn-over occurring near the redshifts of interest. For example, ff fesc(|$z$| = 3) ∼ 1 per cent (consistent with upper limits by Vanzella et al. 2010) and fesc(|$z$| = 6) ∼ 15 per cent (as in Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère 2012), then the inferred |$f_{\rm esc,Ly}^{\rm eff}$| from Dijkstra & Jeeson-Daniel (2013) and Hayes et al. (2011), implies that |$y \sim 0.3{\rm -}0.5$|, which corresponds to |$f_{\rm esc,pk} \sim 0.2{\rm -}0.3$|. We would have a peak in Lyα luminosity near the fesc and redshift of interest.

5 CONCLUSION

We have investigated whether the observed reduction in Lyα flux from galaxies at |$z$| > 6 can be explained by an evolving escape fraction of ionizing photons (fesc). Our study was motivated by (i) a growing consensus in the literature that fesc must have been higher at high redshift, and (ii) the fact that it appears difficult to explain the observed reduction in Lyα flux with reionization alone. We found that we can reproduce the median observed drop in the Lyα fraction, as well as the observed evolution of the LAE LFs, with a small increase in fesc of Δfesc ≲ 0.1, as long as the escape fraction is large (fesc ∼ 0.65) at |$z$| ∼ 6. Models with redshift evolution of fesc that are more consistent with indirect constraints derived from observations, combined with a small evolution in global neutral fraction of |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}\sim 0.2$| between |$z\sim 7\,{\rm and }\,6$| also suppress the |$z$| ∼ 7 Lyα flux at the observed level. Our study demonstrates that an evolving escape fraction of ionizing photons from galaxies modifies the observed equivalent widths of Lyα galaxies at a level comparable to that expected from reionization, and provides a plausible part of the explanation for evolution in the Lyα emission of high-redshift galaxies.

Finally, we expect the Lyα spectral line shape to evolve with redshift in models that invoke the IGM to explain the reduced Lyα flux from |$z$| > 6 galaxies (see fig. 5 of Dijkstra et al. 2007), while this is not obviously the case for models that invoke evolution of fesc. Interestingly, Hu et al. (2010) have shown that the observed Lyα line shape of a stack of |$z$| ∼ 6.5 galaxies is practically identical to that at |$z$| = 5.7. We will investigate the implications of this result in future work.

This research was conducted by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-Sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), through project number CE 110001020. MD acknowledges financial support from DAAD. We thank an anonymous referee for constructive comments that improved the presentation of this work.

1

If the star formation rate is tied to the formation of dark matter structures (it is difficult to imagine that it can be faster than this), then it is limited by the growth of the collapsed mass. Even when one ignores recombinations in LLSs, which slow down the late stages of reionization (e.g. Furlanetto & Mesinger 2009; Alvarez & Abel 2012; Sobacchi & Mesinger in preparation), and when one assumes that the rapidly growing exponential tail of the mass function is driving the late stages of reionization, then one still gets a ≲ 50 per cent change in |$x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$| over Δ|$z$| = 1 (e.g. see fig. 1 in Lidz et al. 2007). Relaxing both of these extreme assumptions slows down the evolution further.

2

Of course, individual galaxies at |$z$| > 6 can be dusty (see e.g. Finkelstein et al. 2013, for an example at |$z$| = 7.5 with weak Lyα emission).

3

Dijkstra et al. (2011) computed |$\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}$|-PDFs, |$P_7(\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})$|, as part of their analysis, and this could also be folded into the calculation. Dijkstra et al. (2011) further assumed that |$\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM,6}=1$|. Under these assumptions we have |$P_7({\rm EW}) \propto \int d\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}\ P_7(\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})P_6({\rm EW}/\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM})$|.

4

We denote differential and cumulative probability distributions with lower and upper case letters, respectively. That is, we denote |$p(x) \equiv \frac{\rm{d}P}{\rm{d}x}$|.

5

This (again) assumes that |$\mathcal {T}_{\rm IGM}(z=6)=1$|. This assumption is conservative in the sense that it maximizes the impact of reionization (see Dijkstra et al. 2011, for a discussion).

6

We stress that: (i) the choice σ = 0.3 is a bit arbitrary, but intermediate between having negligible dispersion and having such a large dispersion that p(ffesc) approaches a uniform distribution. We have verified that our main conclusions are not affected by the precise choice of σ; (ii) EW0 corresponds to the scalelength of P0(EW). As we mentioned in Section 2, we use equation (1) to compute P6(EW). In contrast, previous works adopted an exponential function for P6(EW), which generally has a different scalelength than P0(EW).

7

Coincidentally the scalelength EW0 = 55 Å in P0(EW) for the sample of bright drop-out galaxies is close to the scale-length of EW0 = 50 Å adopted in Dijkstra et al. (2011) for the function P6(EW), the observed EW-distribution of |$z$| ∼ 6 drop-out galaxies (from Stark et al. 2010).

8

The majority of |$z$| ∼ 5.7 LAEs have MUV ≳ −20.5, where LAEs are detected only marginally in the continuum (see fig. 22 of Ouchi et al. 2008). A proper calculation would take into account that there are UV-bright LAEs (MUV ≲ −21.0) for which P(EW) is different. However, because there are fewer of these galaxies, the impact of the assumed P(EW) at bright MUV only has little impact on the bright end of the Lyα LF. We have repeated our analysis with the MUV-dependent P(EW) given by Dijkstra & Wyithe (2012) and obtained practically the same results.

9

Fig. 8 of Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère (2012) shows the constraint on fesc(|$z$| = 7) as a function of the minimum UV-luminosity to which they extrapolate the observed UV-LFs. Notably, the constraint fesc(|$z$| = 7) ∼ 20 per cent includes all galaxies with MUV < −13.0 and thus involves extrapolating the UV-LF by 4–5 mag. (also see Grazian et al. 2011)

10

The evidence for such a dramatic evolution in fesc can be ameliorated however with, e.g. (i) a luminosity (i.e. halo mass) dependence of fesc (as in e.g. Ferrara & Loeb 2013); (ii) an (evolving) contribution of very faint dwarf galaxies; and/or (iii) a loosening of the kinetic Sunyaev–Zeldovich reionization constraints used in the analysis for Kuhlen & Faucher-Giguère (2012), which Mesinger, McQuinn & Spergel (2012) show are insensitive to the end stages of reionization. We return to the issue of (i) in the next section, but (ii), in particular, is not surprising, as pointed out by Alvarez, Finlator & Trenti (2012). A population of dwarf galaxies near the atomic cooling threshold with moderate values of fesc could reionize the Universe at |$z$| ∼ 10. Photoionization feedback from reionization itself would subsequently suppress star formation in galaxies around this mass scale (e.g. Sobacchi & Mesinger 2013), so that they no longer contribute to the ionizing emissivity at |$z$| ∼ 4.

11

We have to pick a different EW0 because we changed p6(fesc). For the new choice for p6(fesc) the predicted EW-PDF |$P_6(\rm EW)$| differs from that shown in Fig. 1.

12

It is worth noting that if the IGM is not fully neutral even at |$z$| ≈ 6 (which is consistent with current observations e.g. McGreer, Mesinger & Fan 2011; Schroeder, Mesinger & Haiman 2013), then the |$\Delta x_{\rm H\,\small {I}}$| required to match observations is decreased (McQuinn et al. 2007b; Mesinger & Furlanetto 2008; Dijkstra et al. 2011).

13

In the extreme scenario in which fesc = 1 along certain sightlines, and fesc = 0 otherwise, the angle-averaged escape fraction |$f^{\Omega }_{\rm esc}$| is just the sky-covering factor of low column density ‘holes’, i.e. |$f^{\Omega }_{\rm esc}=\Omega _{\rm hole}/4 \pi$|.

REFERENCES

Alvarez
M. A.
Abel
T.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
747
 pg. 
126
 
Alvarez
M. A.
Finlator
K.
Trenti
M.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
759
 pg. 
L38
 
Atek
H.
Kunth
D.
Hayes
M.
Östlin
G.
Mas-Hesse
J. M.
A&A
2008
, vol. 
488
 pg. 
491
 
Atek
H.
Kunth
D.
Schaerer
D.
Hayes
M.
Deharveng
J. M.
Östlin
G.
Mas-Hesse
J. M.
A&A
2009
, vol. 
506
 pg. 
L1
 
Becker
G. D.
Bolton
J. S.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
436
 pg. 
1023
 
Behrens
C. J.
Dijkstra
M.
Niemeyer
J.
A&A
2014
, vol. 
563
 pg. 
A77
 
Bolton
J. S.
Haehnelt
M. G.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
429
 pg. 
1695
 
Bolton
J. S.
Haehnelt
M. G.
Warren
S. J.
Hewett
P. C.
Mortlock
D. J.
Venemans
B. P.
McMahon
R. G.
Simpson
C.
MNRAS
2011
, vol. 
416
 pg. 
L70
 
Bouwens
R. J.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012a
, vol. 
752
 pg. 
L5
 
Bouwens
R. J.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012b
, vol. 
754
 pg. 
83
 
Caruana
J.
Bunker
A. J.
Wilkins
S. M.
Stanway
E. R.
Lacy
M.
Jarvis
M. J.
Lorenzoni
S.
Hickey
S.
MNRAS
2012
, vol. 
427
 pg. 
3055
 
Caruana
J.
Bunker
A. J.
Wilkins
S. M.
Stanway
E. R.
Lorenzoni
S.
Jarvis
M. J.
Elbert
H.
2013
 
preprint (arXiv:1311.0057)
Cen
R.
Haiman
Z.
Mesinger
A.
ApJ
2005
, vol. 
621
 pg. 
89
 
Clément
B.
, et al. 
A&A
2012
, vol. 
538
 pg. 
A66
 
Dijkstra
M.
Jeeson-Daniel
A.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
435
 pg. 
3333
 
Dijkstra
M.
Wyithe
J. S. B.
MNRAS
2010
, vol. 
408
 pg. 
352
 
Dijkstra
M.
Wyithe
J. S. B.
MNRAS
2012
, vol. 
419
 pg. 
3181
 
Dijkstra
M.
Lidz
A.
Wyithe
J. S. B.
MNRAS
2007a
, vol. 
377
 pg. 
1175
 
Dijkstra
M.
Wyithe
J. S. B.
Haiman
Z.
MNRAS
2007b
, vol. 
379
 pg. 
253
 
Dijkstra
M.
Mesinger
A.
Wyithe
J. S. B.
MNRAS
2011
, vol. 
414
 pg. 
2139
 
Fernandez
E. R.
Shull
J. M.
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
731
 pg. 
20
 
Ferrara
A.
Loeb
A.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
431
 pg. 
2826
 
Finkelstein
S. L.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012a
, vol. 
756
 pg. 
164
 
Finkelstein
S. L.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012b
, vol. 
758
 pg. 
93
 
Finkelstein
S. L.
, et al. 
Nature
2013
, vol. 
502
 pg. 
524
 
Fontana
A.
, et al. 
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
725
 pg. 
L205
 
Forero-Romero
J. E.
Yepes
G.
Gottlöber
S.
Prada
F.
MNRAS
2012
, vol. 
419
 pg. 
952
 
Furlanetto
S. R.
Zaldarriaga
M.
Hernquist
L.
ApJ
2004
, vol. 
613
 pg. 
1
 
Furlanetto
S. R.
Mesinger
A.
MNRAS
2009
, vol. 
394
 pg. 
1667
 
Grazian
A.
, et al. 
A&A
2011
, vol. 
532
 pg. 
A33
 
Haardt
F.
Madau
P.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
746
 pg. 
125
 
Haiman
Z.
Spaans
M.
ApJ
1999
, vol. 
518
 pg. 
138
 
Hayes
M.
Schaerer
D.
Östlin
G.
Gran
M.-H.J.
Miguel Atek
H.
Kunth
D.
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
730
 pg. 
8
 
Heckman
T. M.
, et al. 
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
730
 pg. 
5
 
Hu
E. M.
Cowie
L. L.
McMahon
R. G.
ApJ
1998
, vol. 
502
 pg. 
L99
 
Hu
E. M.
Cowie
L. L.
Barger
A. J.
Capak
P.
Kakazu
Y.
Trouille
L.
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
725
 pg. 
394
 
Inoue
A. K.
Iwata
I.
Deharveng
J.-M.
MNRAS
2006
, vol. 
371
 pg. 
L1
 
Iwata
I.
, et al. 
ApJ
2009
, vol. 
692
 pg. 
1287
 
Jensen
H.
Laursen
P.
Mellema
G.
Iliev
I. T.
Sommer-Larsen
J.
Shapiro
P. R.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
428
 pg. 
1366
 
Jones
T.
Stark
D. P.
Ellis
R. S.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
751
 pg. 
51
 
Jones
T.
Ellis
R. S.
Schenker
M. A.
Stark
D. P.
ApJ
2013
, vol. 
779
 pg. 
52
 
Kashikawa
N.
, et al. 
ApJ
2006
, vol. 
648
 pg. 
7
 
Kornei
K. A.
Shapley
A. E.
Erb
D. K.
Steidel
C. C.
Reddy
N. A.
Pettini
M.
Bogosavljević
M.
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
711
 pg. 
693
 
Kuhlen
M.
Faucher-Giguère
C.-A.
MNRAS
2012
, vol. 
423
 pg. 
862
 
Laursen
P.
Sommer-Larsen
J.
Razoumov
A. O.
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
728
 pg. 
52
 
Lidz
A.
McQuinn
M.
Zaldarriaga
M.
Hernquist
L.
Dutta
S.
ApJ
2007
, vol. 
670
 pg. 
39
 
McGreer
I. D.
Mesinger
A.
Fan
X.
MNRAS
2011
, vol. 
415
 pg. 
3237
 
McQuinn
M.
Lidz
A.
Zahn
O.
Dutta
S.
Hernquist
L.
Zaldarriaga
M.
MNRAS
2007a
, vol. 
377
 pg. 
1043
 
McQuinn
M.
Hernquist
L.
Zaldarriaga
M.
Dutta
S.
MNRAS
2007b
, vol. 
381
 pg. 
75
 
Mesinger
A.
Furlanetto
S.
ApJ
2007
, vol. 
669
 pg. 
663
 
Mesinger
A.
Furlanetto
S.
MNRAS
2008
, vol. 
386
 pg. 
1990
 
Mesinger
A.
Haiman
Z.
ApJ
2007
, vol. 
660
 pg. 
923
 
Mesinger
A.
Furlanetto
S.
Cen
R.
MNRAS
2011
, vol. 
407
 pg. 
1328
 
Mesinger
A.
McQuinn
M.
Spergel
D.
MNRAS
2012
, vol. 
422
 pg. 
1403
 
Miralda-Escude
J.
ApJ
1998
, vol. 
501
 pg. 
15
 
Mitra
S.
Ferrara
A.
Choudhury
T. R.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
428
 pg. 
L1
 
Nestor
D. B.
Shapley
A. E.
Steidel
C. C.
Siana
B.
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
736
 pg. 
18
 
Ono
Y.
Ouchi
M.
Shimasaku
K.
Dunlop
J.
Farrah
D.
McLure
R.
Okamura
S.
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
724
 pg. 
1524
 
Ono
Y.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
744
 pg. 
83
 
Ota
K.
, et al. 
PASJ
2010
, vol. 
62
 pg. 
1167
 
Ouchi
M.
, et al. 
ApJS
2008
, vol. 
176
 pg. 
301
 
Ouchi
M.
, et al. 
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
723
 pg. 
869
 
Pentericci
L.
, et al. 
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
743
 pg. 
132
 
Rahmati
A.
Schaye
J.
Pawlik
A. H.
Raicevic
M.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
431
 pg. 
2261
 
Robertson
B. E.
, et al. 
ApJ
2013
, vol. 
768
 pg. 
71
 
Santos
M. R.
MNRAS
2004
, vol. 
349
 pg. 
1137
 
Schaerer
D.
A&A
2003
, vol. 
397
 pg. 
527
 
Schenker
M. A.
Stark
D. P.
Ellis
R. S.
Richard
S.
Robertson
B. E.
Dunlop
J. S.
McLure
R. J.
Kneib
J.-P.
Richard
J.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
744
 pg. 
179
 
Schroeder
J.
Mesinger
A.
Haiman
Z.
2013
, vol. 
428
 pg. 
3058
 
Shapley
A. E.
Steidel
C. C.
Pettini
M.
Adelberger
K. L.
ApJ
2003
, vol. 
588
 pg. 
65
 
Shapley
A. E.
Steidel
C. C.
Pettini
M.
Adelberger
K. L.
Erb
D. K.
ApJ
2006
, vol. 
651
 pg. 
688
 
Sobacchi
E.
Mesinger
A.
MNRAS
2013
, vol. 
432
 pg. 
3340
 
Sobacchi
E.
Mesinger
A.
MNRAS
2014
 
preprint (arXiv:1402.2298)
Stark
D. P.
Ellis
R. S.
Chiu
K.
Ouchi
M.
Bunker
A.
MNRAS
2010
, vol. 
408
 pg. 
1628
 
Stark
D. P.
Ellis
R. S.
Ouchi
M.
ApJ
2011
, vol. 
728
 pg. 
L2
 
Taylor
J.
Lidz
A.
MNRAS
2013
pg. 
2740
 
Treu
T.
Trenti
M.
Stiavelli
M.
Auger
M. W.
Bradley
L. D.
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
747
 pg. 
27
 
Treu
T.
Schmidt
K. B.
Trenti
M.
Bradley
L. D.
Stiavelli
M.
ApJ
2013
, vol. 
775
 pg. 
L29
 
Vanzella
E.
, et al. 
ApJ
2010
, vol. 
725
 pg. 
1011
 
Vanzella
E.
, et al. 
ApJ
2012
, vol. 
751
 pg. 
70
 
Wyithe
J. S. B.
Loeb
A.
Nature
2004
, vol. 
427
 pg. 
815
 
Wyithe
J. S. B.
Hopkins
A. M.
Kistler
M. D.
Yüksel
H.
Beacom
J. F.
MNRAS
2010
, vol. 
401
 pg. 
2561
 
Zahn
O.
Mesinger
A.
McQuinn
M.
Trac
H.
Cen
R.
Hernquist
L. E.
MNRAS
2011
, vol. 
414
 pg. 
727