Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A Cadaveric Study Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Blockade
  1. Jason Ivanusic, PhD*,
  2. Yasutaka Konishi, MD, and
  3. Michael J. Barrington, PhD, MBBS, FANZCA,§
  1. *Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne
  2. Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
  3. Department of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
  4. §Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
  1. Address correspondence to: Michael J. Barrington, PhD, MBBS, FANZCA, Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria Parade, PO Box 2900 Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia (e-mail: Michael.Barrington{at}svha.org.au).

Abstract

Background and Objectives Erector spinae block is an ultrasound-guided interfascial plane block first described in 2016. The objectives of this cadaveric dye injection and dissection study were to simulate an erector spinae block to determine if dye would spread anteriorly to the involve origins of the ventral and dorsal branches of the spinal nerves.

Methods In 10 unembalmed human cadavers, 20 mL of 0.25% methylene blue dye was injected bilaterally into the plane between the fifth thoracic transverse process and erector spinae muscle. An in-plane ultrasound-guided technique with the transducer orientated longitudinally was used. During dissection, superficial and deep muscles were identified, and extent of dye spread was documented in cephalocaudal and lateral directions. The ventral and dorsal rami of spinal nerves and dorsal root ganglion at each level were examined to determine if they were stained by dye.

Results There was extensive cephalocaudad and lateral spread of dye deep and superficial to the erector spinae muscles. Except for 1 injection (from 20), the ventral rami were not stained by the dye. In only 2 injections did the dye track posteriorly through the costotransverse foramen to the dorsal root ganglion. In all other cases, the dorsal root ganglia were not involved in the dye injection. The dye stained the dorsal rami posterior to the costotransverse foramen.

Conclusions There was no spread of dye anteriorly to the paravertebral space to involve origins of the ventral and dorsal branches of the thoracic spinal nerves. Dorsal ramus involvement was posterior to the costotransverse foramen.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding was from departmental resources only. Support was provided by the Imaging and Posters Unit at the Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, and Anastasia Arsenoulis from FUJIFILM SonoSite, Inc, which provided an ultrasound machine.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.