Abstract
Fitness landscape mapping and the prediction of evolutionary trajectories on these landscapes are major tasks in evolutionary biology research. Evolutionary dynamics is tightly linked to the landscape topography, but this relation is not straightforward. Here, we analyze a fitness landscape of a yeast tRNA gene, previously measured under four different conditions. We find that the wild type allele is sub-optimal, and 8%-10% of its variants are fitter. We rule out the possibilities that the wild type is fittest on average on multiple conditions or located on a local fitness maximum. Instead, we find that the wild type is mutationally robust (‘flat’), while more fit variants are typically mutationally fragile. Similar observations of mutational robustness or flatness have been so far made in very few cases, predominantly in viral genomes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
Steepness measure was replaced by fragility measure for gene robustness. The last part of the earlier manuscript was removed.