Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees

  1. Ricarda Scheiner1,3,
  2. Anthea Kuritz-Kaiser1,
  3. Randolf Menzel2, and
  4. Joachim Erber1
  1. 1Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Ökologie, FR 1-1, D-10587 Berlin, Germany2 Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie, D-14195 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

In tactile learning, sucrose is the unconditioned stimulus and reward, which is usually applied to the antenna to elicit proboscis extension and which the bee can drink when it is subsequently applied to the extended proboscis. The conditioned stimulus is a tactile object that the bee can scan with its antennae. In this paper we describe the quantitative relationships between gustatory antennal stimulation, gustatory proboscis stimulation, and tactile learning and memory. Bees are 10-fold more responsive to sucrose solutions when they are applied to the antenna compared to proboscis stimulation. During tactile conditioning, the sucrose solution applied to the proboscis determines the level of acquisition, whereas antennal input is of minor importance. Bees differing in their gustatory responsiveness measured at the antenna differ strongly in their tactile acquisition and memory. We demonstrate how these differences in tactile acquisition and memory can be greatly reduced by calculating equal subjective rewards, based on individual gustatory responsiveness.

Footnotes

  • Article and publication are at http://www.learnmem.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/lm.98105.

    • Accepted October 6, 2005.
    • Received May 6, 2005.
| Table of Contents