Polycomb complexes redundantly maintain epidermal stem cell identity during development

  1. Elena Ezhkova2
  1. 1The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, Faculty of Health Science, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel;
  2. 2Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Department of Cell, Developmental, and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA;
  3. 3Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA;
  4. 4Department of Cell Biology and Development, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico;
  5. 5Yale Center for Genome Analysis, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA;
  6. 6Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA;
  7. 7Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, USA;
  8. 8Laboratory for Developmental Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (RIKEN-IMS), Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
  9. 9AMED-CREST, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan;
  10. 10Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA;
  11. 11Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA
  1. Corresponding author: elena.ezhkova{at}mssm.edu
  1. 13 These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • 12 Present address: U1036, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), 38000 Grenoble, France.

Abstract

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2 are critical epigenetic developmental regulators. PRC1 and PRC2 largely overlap in their genomic binding and cooperate to establish repressive chromatin domains demarcated by H2AK119ub and H3K27me3. However, the functional contribution of each complex to gene repression has been a subject of debate, and understanding of its physiological significance requires further studies. Here, using the developing murine epidermis as a paradigm, we uncovered a previously unappreciated functional redundancy between Polycomb complexes. Coablation of PRC1 and PRC2 in embryonic epidermal progenitors resulted in severe defects in epidermal stratification, a phenotype not observed in the single PRC1-null or PRC2-null epidermis. Molecular dissection indicated a loss of epidermal identity that was coupled to a strong derepression of nonlineage transcription factors, otherwise repressed by either PRC1 or PRC2 in the absence of its counterpart. Ectopic expression of subsets of PRC1/2-repressed nonepidermal transcription factors in wild-type epidermal stem cells was sufficient to suppress epidermal identity genes, highlighting the importance of functional redundancy between PRC1 and PRC2. Altogether, our studies show how PRC1 and PRC2 function as two independent counterparts, thereby providing a repressive safety net that protects and preserves lineage identity.

Keywords

Footnotes

  • Received October 1, 2020.
  • Accepted January 4, 2021.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Related Article

| Table of Contents

Life Science Alliance