High-pressure versus isoelectronic doping effect on the honeycomb iridate Na2IrO3

V. Hermann, J. Ebad-Allah, F. Freund, I. M. Pietsch, A. Jesche, A. A. Tsirlin, J. Deisenhofer, M. Hanfland, P. Gegenwart, and C. A. Kuntscher
Phys. Rev. B 96, 195137 – Published 20 November 2017

Abstract

We study the effect of isoelectronic doping and external pressure in tuning the ground state of the honeycomb iridate Na2IrO3 by combining optical spectroscopy with synchrotron x-ray diffraction measurements on single crystals. The obtained optical conductivity of Na2IrO3 is discussed in terms of a Mott-insulating picture versus the formation of quasimolecular orbitals and in terms of Kitaev interactions. With increasing Li content x, (Na1xLix)2IrO3 moves deeper into the Mott-insulating regime, and there are indications that up to a doping level of 24% the compound comes closer to the Kitaev limit. The optical conductivity spectrum of single-crystalline αLi2IrO3 does not follow the trends observed for the series up to x=0.24. There are strong indications that αLi2IrO3 is not as close to the Kitaev limit as Na2IrO3 and lies closer to the quasimolecular orbital picture instead. Except for the pressure-induced hardening of the phonon modes, the optical properties of Na2IrO3 seem to be robust against external pressure. Possible explanations of the unexpected evolution of the optical conductivity with isolectronic doping and the drastic change between x=0.24 and x=1 are given by comparing the pressure-induced changes of lattice parameters and the optical conductivity with the corresponding changes induced by doping.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 6 July 2017
  • Revised 9 October 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195137

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

V. Hermann1, J. Ebad-Allah1,2, F. Freund3, I. M. Pietsch3, A. Jesche3, A. A. Tsirlin3, J. Deisenhofer4, M. Hanfland5, P. Gegenwart3, and C. A. Kuntscher1,*

  • 1Experimentalphysik II, Augsburg University, 86159 Augsburg, Germany
  • 2Department of Physics, Tanta University, 31527 Tanta, Egypt
  • 3Experimentalphysik VI, Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism, Augsburg University, 86159 Augsburg, Germany
  • 4Experimentalphysik V, Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism, Augsburg University, 86135 Augsburg, Germany
  • 5European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Boîte Postale 220, 38043 Grenoble, France

  • *christine.kuntscher@physik.uni-augsburg.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 19 — 15 November 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×