Quantum initial conditions for inflation and canonical invariance

F. J. Agocs, L. T. Hergt, W. J. Handley, A. N. Lasenby, and M. P. Hobson
Phys. Rev. D 102, 023507 – Published 1 July 2020

Abstract

We investigate the transformation of initial conditions for primordial curvature perturbations under two types of transformations of the associated action: simultaneous redefinition of time and the field to be quantized, and the addition of surface terms. The latter encompasses all canonical transformations, whilst the time and field redefinition is a distinct, noncanonical transformation since the initial and destination systems use different times. Actions related to each other via such transformations yield identical equations of motion and preserve the commutator structure. They further preserve the time evolution of expectation values of quantum operators unless the vacuum state also changes under the transformation. These properties suggest that it is of interest to investigate vacuum prescriptions that also remain unchanged under canonical transformations. We find that initial conditions derived via minimizing the vacuum expectation value of the Hamiltonian and those obtained using the Danielsson vacuum prescription are not invariant under these transformations, whereas those obtained by minimizing the local energy density are invariant. We derive the range of physically distinct initial conditions obtainable by Hamiltonian diagonalization, and illustrate their effect on the scalar primordial power spectrum and the cosmic microwave background under the “just enough inflation” model. We also generalize the analogy between the dynamics of a quantum scalar field on a curved, time-dependent spacetime and the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation. We argue that the invariance of the vacuum prescription obtained by minimizing the renormalized stress-energy tensor should make it the preferred procedure for setting initial conditions for primordial perturbations. All other procedures reviewed in this work yield ambiguous initial conditions, which is problematic both in theory and in practice.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 19 February 2020
  • Accepted 27 May 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023507

© 2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & AstrophysicsParticles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

F. J. Agocs1,2,*, L. T. Hergt1,2,†, W. J. Handley1,2,‡, A. N. Lasenby1,2,§, and M. P. Hobson1,∥

  • 1Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, J.J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 2Kavli Institute for Cosmology, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, United Kingdom

  • *fa325@cam.ac.uk
  • lh561@cam.ac.uk
  • wh260@cam.ac.uk
  • §a.n.lasenby@mrao.cam.ac.uk
  • mph@mrao.cam.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 2 — 15 July 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×