125 GeV Higgs boson and electroweak phase transition model classes

Daniel J. H. Chung, Andrew J. Long, and Lian-Tao Wang
Phys. Rev. D 87, 023509 – Published 11 January 2013

Abstract

Recently, the ATLAS and CMS detectors have discovered a bosonic particle which, to a reasonable degree of statistical uncertainty, fits the profile of the Standard Model Higgs. One obvious implication is that models which predict a significant departure from Standard Model phenomenology, such as large exotic (e.g., invisible) Higgs decay or mixing with a hidden sector scalar, are already ruled out. This observation threatens the viability of electroweak baryogenesis, which favors, for example, a lighter Higgs and a Higgs coupled to or mixed with light scalars. To assess the broad impact of these constraints, we propose a scheme for classifying models of the electroweak phase transition and impose constraints on a class-by-class basis. We find that models, such as the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, which rely on thermal loop effects are severely constrained by the measurement of a 125 GeV Higgs. Models which rely on tree-level effects from a light singlet are also restricted by invisible decay and mixing constraints. Moreover, we find that the parametric region favored by electroweak baryogenesis often coincides with an enhanced symmetry point with a distinctive phenomenological character. In particular, enhancements arising through an approximate continuous symmetry are phenomenologically disfavored, in contrast with enhancements from discrete symmetries. We also comment on the excess of diphoton events observed by ATLAS and CMS. We note that although Higgs portal models can accommodate both enhanced diphoton decay and a strongly first-order electroweak phase transition, the former favors a negative Higgs portal coupling whereas the latter favors a positive one, and therefore these two constraints are at tension with one another.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 23 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.023509

© 2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Daniel J. H. Chung1,*, Andrew J. Long1,2,†, and Lian-Tao Wang3,4,‡

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85827-1404, USA
  • 3Department of Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 4Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

  • *danielchung@wisc.edu
  • andrewjlong@asu.edu
  • liantaow@uchicago.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 2 — 15 January 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×