Origin of the Difference of the Coverage-Dependent Vibrational Shift for S on Ni(100) and O on Ni(100)

Charles W. Bauschlicher, Jr. and Paul S. Bagus
Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 349 – Published 28 January 1985
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

The p(2×2) and c(2×2) coverages of S on Ni(100) are studied with a cluster model. Consistent with a recent lattice-dynamics study, the chemical contribution (rigid Ni lattice) to the coverage-dependent shift of the S vibrational energy is of opposite sign to that for O. Analysis of the cluster wave functions suggests that S becomes less negatively charged with coverage, while O becomes more ionic; however, this effect is small.

  • Received 15 June 1984

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.349

©1985 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Charles W. Bauschlicher, Jr.

  • NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035

Paul S. Bagus

  • IBM Research Laboratory, San Jose, California 95193

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 54, Iss. 4 — 28 January 1985

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×