Nonvanishing effect of detuning errors in dynamical-decoupling-based quantum sensing experiments

J. E. Lang, T. Madhavan, J.-P. Tetienne, D. A. Broadway, L. T. Hall, T. Teraji, T. S. Monteiro, A. Stacey, and L. C. L. Hollenberg
Phys. Rev. A 99, 012110 – Published 9 January 2019

Abstract

Characteristic dips appear in the coherence traces of a probe qubit when dynamical decoupling (DD) is applied in synchrony with the precession of target nuclear spins, forming the basis for nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The frequency of the microwave control pulses is chosen to match the qubit transition but this can be detuned from resonance by experimental errors, hyperfine coupling intrinsic to the qubit, or inhomogeneous broadening. The detuning acts as an additional static field which is generally assumed to be completely removed in Hahn echo and DD experiments. Here we demonstrate that this is not the case in the presence of finite pulse-durations, where a detuning can drastically alter the coherence response of the probe qubit, with important implications for sensing applications. Using the electronic spin associated with a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond as a test qubit system, we analytically and experimentally study the qubit coherence response under CPMG and XY8 dynamical decoupling control schemes in the presence of finite pulse-durations and static detunings. Most striking is the splitting of the NMR resonance under CPMG, whereas under XY8 the amplitude of the NMR signal is modulated. Our work shows that the detuning error must not be neglected when extracting data from quantum sensor coherence traces.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 10 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.012110

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

General Physics

Authors & Affiliations

J. E. Lang1,*, T. Madhavan2, J.-P. Tetienne2,†, D. A. Broadway2,3, L. T. Hall2, T. Teraji4, T. S. Monteiro1, A. Stacey2,3, and L. C. L. Hollenberg2,3

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
  • 2School of Physics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • 3Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, School of Physics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
  • 4National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan

  • *jacob.lang.14@ucl.ac.uk
  • jtetienne@unimelb.edu.au

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 1 — January 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×