Smooth- and rough-wall boundary layer structure from high spatial range particle image velocimetry

D. T. Squire, C. Morrill-Winter, N. Hutchins, I. Marusic, M. P. Schultz, and J. C. Klewicki
Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 064402 – Published 7 October 2016

Abstract

Two particle image velocimetry arrangements are used to make true spatial comparisons between smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers at high Reynolds numbers across a very wide range of streamwise scales. Together, the arrangements resolve scales ranging from motions on the order of the Kolmogorov microscale to those longer than twice the boundary layer thickness. The rough-wall experiments were obtained above a continuous sandpaper sheet, identical to that used by Squire et al. [J. Fluid Mech. 795, 210 (2016)], and cover a range of friction and equivalent sand-grain roughness Reynolds numbers (12000δ+ 18000, 62ks+104). The smooth-wall experiments comprise new and previously published data spanning 6500δ+17000. Flow statistics from all experiments show similar Reynolds number trends and behaviors to recent, well-resolved hot-wire anemometry measurements above the same rough surface. Comparisons, at matched δ+, between smooth- and rough-wall two-point correlation maps and two-point magnitude-squared coherence maps demonstrate that spatially the outer region of the boundary layer is the same between the two flows. This is apparently true even at wall-normal locations where the total (inner-normalized) energy differs between the smooth and rough wall. Generally, the present results provide strong support for Townsend's [The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1956), Vol. 1] wall-similarity hypothesis in high Reynolds number fully rough boundary layer flows.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 28 June 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.064402

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

D. T. Squire*, C. Morrill-Winter, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

M. P. Schultz

  • Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland 21402-5042, USA

J. C. Klewicki

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia and Mechanical Engineering Department, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA

  • *squired@unimelb.edu.au

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 1, Iss. 6 — October 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Fluids

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×