Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by T. C. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246104 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 19 November 2004
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.139601
©2005 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by T. C. Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246104 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.139601
©2005 American Physical Society