Liquid-Nitrogen-Cooled Ca+ Optical Clock with Systematic Uncertainty of 3×1018

Yao Huang, Baolin Zhang, Mengyan Zeng, Yanmei Hao, Zixiao Ma, Huaqing Zhang, Hua Guan, Zheng Chen, Miao Wang, and Kelin Gao
Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 034041 – Published 15 March 2022

Abstract

We present a liquid-nitrogen-cooled Ca+ optical clock with an overall systematic uncertainty of 3.0×1018. In contrast to the room-temperature Ca+ optical clock that we have reported previously, the cryogenic black-body radiation (BBR) shield in vacuum is cooled to 82±5 K using liquid nitrogen. We also implement an ion trap with a reduced heating rate and improved laser cooling. This allows the ion temperature to fall to the Doppler-cooling limit during the clock operation and the systematic uncertainty associated with the secular (thermal) motion of the ion is reduced to <1×1018. The uncertainty arising from the probe laser light shift and the servo error is also reduced to <1×1019 and 4×1019 with the hyper-Ramsey method and the higher-order servo algorithm, respectively. By comparing the output frequency of the cryogenic clock to that of a room-temperature clock, the differential BBR shift between the two is determined with a fractional statistical uncertainty of 7×1018. The differential BBR shift is used to calculate the static differential polarizability and the result is found to be in excellent agreement with our previous measurement using a different method. This work suggests that the BBR shift of optical clocks can be suppressed well in a liquid-nitrogen environment. Systems similar to what is presented here can also be used to suppress the BBR shift significantly in other types of optical clocks, such as Yb+, Sr+, Yb, Sr, etc.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 7 April 2021
  • Revised 23 December 2021
  • Accepted 3 January 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.034041

© 2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

Yao Huang1,2, Baolin Zhang1,2,3, Mengyan Zeng1,2,4, Yanmei Hao1,2, Zixiao Ma1,2,3, Huaqing Zhang1,2,3, Hua Guan1,2,*, Zheng Chen1,2,3, Miao Wang1,2,3, and Kelin Gao1,2,†

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Atomic Frequency Standards, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 4Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

  • *guanhua@apm.ac.cn
  • klgao@apm.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 17, Iss. 3 — March 2022

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×