Magnetic phase diagram for Fe3xMnxBO5

F. Damay, J. Sottmann, F. Lainé, L. Chaix, M. Poienar, P. Beran, E. Elkaim, F. Fauth, L. Nataf, A. Guesdon, A. Maignan, and C. Martin
Phys. Rev. B 101, 094418 – Published 16 March 2020

Abstract

The heterometallic ludwigite system Fe3xMnxBO5, recently investigated for its ferroelectric properties, has been studied using synchrotron and neutron diffraction, combined with x-ray absorption near-edge structure and magnetization measurements. The results show that the Pbam crystal structure is preserved with little structural distortions up to x=1.5, and that divalent Mn is substituted preferentially on the 3LL2 sublattice unit. As x increases, and up to Fe2MnBO5, the decoupled magnetic sublattice character of Fe3BO5 is preserved: magnetic order on 3LL1 [k1=(0012), moments along b] survives with reduced magnetic moments, while the correlation length of the magnetic order on 3LL2 [k2=(000), moments along a] decreases. In contrast, for x=1.5, a k = (0 0 0) magnetic ordering, coupling both sublattices, is observed, with all moments aligned along c. These results provide insight on the physical properties of the system, which are discussed in terms of three main parameters : (i) nonlinear evolution of the substitution on each sublattice, (ii) changes in the direct-exchange and superexchange couplings as Mn2+ (3d5, isoelectronic with Fe3+, is introduced in the structure), and (iii) competing easy-axis anisotropy and magnetic exchanges along the 3LL legs in the decoupled sub-lattice regime. These three parameters are at the origin of an extremely rich (x, T) magnetic phase diagram in the Fe3xMnxBO5 system.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 30 August 2019
  • Revised 6 January 2020
  • Accepted 18 February 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.094418

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

F. Damay1, J. Sottmann2, F. Lainé2, L. Chaix1, M. Poienar3, P. Beran4,5, E. Elkaim6, F. Fauth7, L. Nataf6, A. Guesdon2, A. Maignan2, and C. Martin2

  • 1Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, CEA-CNRS UMR 12, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Normandie Univ, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CNRS, CRISMAT, 14000 Caen, France
  • 3National Institute for Research and Development in Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter, Str. Dr. A. Păunescu Podeanu, nr.144, 300569 Timişoara, Timiş, Romania
  • 4Nuclear Physics Institute, 25068 Rez Near Prague, Czech Republic
  • 5European Spallation Source ERIC, Box 176, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
  • 6Synchrotron Soleil, Saint-Aubin BP 48, 91192 GIF-sur-YVETTE Cedex, France
  • 7CELLS ALBA Synchrotron, Carrer de la Llum 2-26, 08290 Cerdanyola del Vallès, BARCELONA, Spain

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 9 — 1 March 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×