Download citation
Download citation
link to html
Thymine crystallizes from 50% hydrogen peroxide to give the title hydrogen peroxide water solvate, C5H6N2O2·0.55H2O2·0.45H2O. The disordered peroxide and water mol­ecules occupy the same positions. Thymine mol­ecules are linked together by N—H...O hydrogen bonds forming chains parallel to the ac diagonal. Hydrogen peroxide mol­ecules are combined by O—H...O hydrogen bonds to give chains parallel to the c axis. Both kinds of chains are organized in a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807053585/rz2169sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807053585/rz2169Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667478

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 120 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • Disorder in main residue
  • R factor = 0.045
  • wR factor = 0.108
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT077_ALERT_4_C Unitcell contains non-integer number of atoms .. ? PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 13.00 Perc. PLAT432_ALERT_2_C Short Inter X...Y Contact O2 .. C2 .. 3.01 Ang.
Alert level G PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 3
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 5 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Hydrogen bonding plays the main role in forming crystals of peroxosolvates. It was supposed that it might be possible to design stable hydrogen peroxide carriers by maximizing the number of hydrogen bonds in the structure (Adams & Ramdas, 1978). Moreover, hydrogen peroxide complexes are of great importance for various biochemical processes (Rojkind et al., 2002). Previously, the structure of adenine hydrogen peroxide adduct was determined (Serra et al., 1992). Herein we report the structure of the title compound as part of our study of organic hydrogen peroxide solvates (Churakov et al., 2005, 2006).

In the structure of the title compound, thymine molecules exhibit the expected planar molecular geometry (Fig. 1). Centrosymmetrically related thymine molecules are linked together by N1—H11···O3 and N2—H21···O3 (Table 1) hydrogen bonds forming chains parallel to ac diagonal (Fig. 2).

The H2O2 molecule has a skew conformation with H—O—O—H torsion angle equal to 113 (4)°. The O—O bond length (1.453 (4) Å) is somewhat shorter than that observed in crystalline hydrogen peroxide (1.461 (3) Å; Savariault & Lehmann, 1980). The disordered peroxide and water molecules occupy the same positions in the crystal lattice. A similar disorder was observed in the structures of hydrogen peroxide water solvates of PPh4+ and AsPh4+ halides (Churakov et al., 2005). Hydrogen peroxide molecules are combined by strong O2—H2···O1 hydrogen bonds to give chains parallel to the c axis.

Both kinds of chains are organized in a three-dimensional network by peroxide–thymine O1—H1···O4 interactions (Fig. 4). Thus, the H2O2 molecule is involved in three hydrogen bonds with adjacent molecules, forming two donor and one acceptor interactions. The inclusion of the disordered water molecule does not break the packing motif while it forms three somewhat longer hydrogen bonds with the same neighbouring molecules.

Related literature top

For general background, see: Adams & Ramdas (1978); Churakov et al. (2005, 2006); Rojkind et al. (2002); Savariault & Lehmann (1980); Serra et al. (1992).

Experimental top

The crystals of the title compound were obtained by cooling down to -18° a saturated solution of thymine in 50% hydrogen peroxide. The experimental data were measured at 120 K due to the instability of the compound at ambient conditions.

Refinement top

All hydrogen atoms were located in a difference Fourier map. The hydrogen peroxide H1 and H2 atoms were refined with the same Uiso and the H1—O1 and H2—O2 distances restrained to be approximately equal (SADI instruction in XL software). The water hydrogen atoms H3 and H4 were also refined with the same Uiso and the H3—O12 and H4—O12 distances restrained (SADI).

Structure description top

Hydrogen bonding plays the main role in forming crystals of peroxosolvates. It was supposed that it might be possible to design stable hydrogen peroxide carriers by maximizing the number of hydrogen bonds in the structure (Adams & Ramdas, 1978). Moreover, hydrogen peroxide complexes are of great importance for various biochemical processes (Rojkind et al., 2002). Previously, the structure of adenine hydrogen peroxide adduct was determined (Serra et al., 1992). Herein we report the structure of the title compound as part of our study of organic hydrogen peroxide solvates (Churakov et al., 2005, 2006).

In the structure of the title compound, thymine molecules exhibit the expected planar molecular geometry (Fig. 1). Centrosymmetrically related thymine molecules are linked together by N1—H11···O3 and N2—H21···O3 (Table 1) hydrogen bonds forming chains parallel to ac diagonal (Fig. 2).

The H2O2 molecule has a skew conformation with H—O—O—H torsion angle equal to 113 (4)°. The O—O bond length (1.453 (4) Å) is somewhat shorter than that observed in crystalline hydrogen peroxide (1.461 (3) Å; Savariault & Lehmann, 1980). The disordered peroxide and water molecules occupy the same positions in the crystal lattice. A similar disorder was observed in the structures of hydrogen peroxide water solvates of PPh4+ and AsPh4+ halides (Churakov et al., 2005). Hydrogen peroxide molecules are combined by strong O2—H2···O1 hydrogen bonds to give chains parallel to the c axis.

Both kinds of chains are organized in a three-dimensional network by peroxide–thymine O1—H1···O4 interactions (Fig. 4). Thus, the H2O2 molecule is involved in three hydrogen bonds with adjacent molecules, forming two donor and one acceptor interactions. The inclusion of the disordered water molecule does not break the packing motif while it forms three somewhat longer hydrogen bonds with the same neighbouring molecules.

For general background, see: Adams & Ramdas (1978); Churakov et al. (2005, 2006); Rojkind et al. (2002); Savariault & Lehmann (1980); Serra et al. (1992).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of the title compound, showing the numbering scheme adopted. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The hydrogen bonded (dashed lines) chains of thymine molecules in the title compound parallel to the ac diagonal. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 - x, 1 - y, 2 - z; (ii) -x, 1 - y, 1 - z; (iii) 1 + x, y, 1 + z].
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The hydrogen bonded (dashed lines) chains of H2O2 molecules in the title compound parallel to the c axis. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, 0.5 - y, -0.5 + z; (ii) x, 0.5 - y, 0.5 + z; (iii) x, y, -1 + z].
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The three-dimensional hydrogen bonded network (dashed lines) in the title compound. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds are omitted.
Thymine hydrogen peroxide 0.55-solvate 0.45-hydrate top
Crystal data top
C5H6N2O2·0.55H2O2·0.45H2OF(000) = 321.6
Mr = 152.93Dx = 1.542 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1539 reflections
a = 6.5047 (16) Åθ = 3.3–29.5°
b = 19.194 (5) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 5.6190 (13) ÅT = 120 K
β = 110.078 (5)°Prism, colourless
V = 658.9 (3) Å30.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K
diffractometer
1733 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1174 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.038
ω scansθmax = 29.0°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 78
Tmin = 0.974, Tmax = 0.987k = 2523
4556 measured reflectionsl = 67
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.108H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0537P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1733 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
147 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C5H6N2O2·0.55H2O2·0.45H2OV = 658.9 (3) Å3
Mr = 152.93Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 6.5047 (16) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
b = 19.194 (5) ÅT = 120 K
c = 5.6190 (13) Å0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
β = 110.078 (5)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K
diffractometer
1733 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
1174 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.974, Tmax = 0.987Rint = 0.038
4556 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0453 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.108H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1733 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
147 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.5189 (2)0.43892 (7)0.7551 (3)0.0193 (3)
N20.1954 (2)0.43931 (7)0.4159 (2)0.0201 (3)
O30.22793 (17)0.50240 (5)0.77214 (19)0.0214 (3)
O40.81449 (18)0.37725 (6)0.7577 (2)0.0269 (3)
C10.3077 (2)0.46216 (7)0.6531 (3)0.0180 (3)
C20.2878 (3)0.39447 (8)0.2885 (3)0.0206 (3)
C30.4944 (2)0.37063 (7)0.3883 (3)0.0187 (3)
C40.6227 (2)0.39384 (7)0.6405 (3)0.0192 (3)
C50.5985 (3)0.32256 (9)0.2523 (3)0.0239 (4)
O10.0489 (5)0.26290 (15)0.7488 (6)0.0323 (7)0.55
O20.2145 (5)0.29347 (15)0.6611 (7)0.0320 (7)0.55
H10.040 (7)0.302 (2)0.740 (9)0.057 (11)*0.55
H20.183 (8)0.269 (2)0.503 (8)0.057 (11)*0.55
O120.1421 (8)0.2877 (2)0.7417 (7)0.0324 (8)0.45
H30.041 (10)0.320 (2)0.711 (10)0.049 (13)*0.45
H40.124 (11)0.269 (3)0.592 (10)0.049 (13)*0.45
H220.191 (3)0.3837 (9)0.119 (3)0.025 (5)*
H530.501 (3)0.3136 (9)0.082 (4)0.030 (5)*
H520.638 (3)0.2786 (10)0.342 (4)0.032 (5)*
H110.590 (3)0.4559 (10)0.893 (4)0.031 (5)*
H510.738 (3)0.3440 (10)0.241 (3)0.029 (5)*
H210.055 (4)0.4561 (11)0.337 (4)0.043 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0163 (6)0.0200 (6)0.0183 (7)0.0007 (5)0.0018 (5)0.0030 (5)
N20.0142 (6)0.0223 (6)0.0207 (7)0.0020 (5)0.0020 (5)0.0018 (5)
O30.0169 (6)0.0230 (6)0.0224 (6)0.0026 (4)0.0044 (5)0.0034 (4)
O40.0182 (6)0.0316 (6)0.0263 (6)0.0081 (5)0.0016 (5)0.0019 (5)
C10.0152 (7)0.0163 (7)0.0205 (8)0.0012 (5)0.0036 (6)0.0014 (6)
C20.0204 (8)0.0218 (7)0.0190 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0059 (6)0.0007 (6)
C30.0205 (8)0.0170 (7)0.0196 (8)0.0012 (6)0.0081 (6)0.0001 (6)
C40.0188 (7)0.0171 (7)0.0223 (8)0.0018 (6)0.0079 (6)0.0034 (6)
C50.0241 (8)0.0241 (8)0.0237 (9)0.0028 (7)0.0082 (7)0.0000 (7)
O10.0287 (15)0.0302 (15)0.0441 (17)0.0045 (12)0.0201 (14)0.0113 (12)
O20.0252 (15)0.0292 (14)0.0436 (19)0.0035 (11)0.0143 (14)0.0008 (12)
O120.026 (2)0.037 (2)0.032 (2)0.0122 (18)0.0064 (18)0.0006 (17)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.3689 (19)C3—C41.446 (2)
N1—C41.385 (2)C3—C51.500 (2)
N1—H110.82 (2)C5—H530.965 (19)
N2—C11.3544 (19)C5—H520.972 (19)
N2—C21.382 (2)C5—H511.016 (19)
N2—H210.93 (2)O1—O21.453 (4)
O3—C11.2453 (18)O1—H10.93 (4)
O4—C41.2361 (18)O2—H20.97 (4)
C2—C31.346 (2)O12—H30.87 (5)
C2—H220.968 (18)O12—H40.89 (5)
C1—N1—C4126.05 (14)C4—C3—C5118.65 (14)
C1—N1—H11115.0 (14)O4—C4—N1118.51 (14)
C4—N1—H11118.8 (14)O4—C4—C3125.46 (14)
C1—N2—C2121.90 (13)N1—C4—C3116.03 (13)
C1—N2—H21118.0 (13)C3—C5—H53111.0 (11)
C2—N2—H21120.0 (13)C3—C5—H52110.7 (11)
O3—C1—N2123.11 (13)H53—C5—H52109.1 (15)
O3—C1—N1121.37 (14)C3—C5—H51110.4 (10)
N2—C1—N1115.51 (14)H53—C5—H51107.8 (14)
C3—C2—N2123.03 (15)H52—C5—H51107.7 (16)
C3—C2—H22123.9 (10)O2—O1—H1100 (3)
N2—C2—H22113.0 (10)O1—O2—H299 (2)
C2—C3—C4117.47 (14)H3—O12—H4105 (5)
C2—C3—C5123.88 (14)
C2—N2—C1—O3179.79 (14)C1—N1—C4—O4179.59 (14)
C2—N2—C1—N11.2 (2)C1—N1—C4—C31.0 (2)
C4—N1—C1—O3179.41 (14)C2—C3—C4—O4179.46 (15)
C4—N1—C1—N21.5 (2)C5—C3—C4—O40.2 (2)
C1—N2—C2—C30.4 (2)C2—C3—C4—N10.1 (2)
N2—C2—C3—C40.1 (2)C5—C3—C4—N1179.10 (14)
N2—C2—C3—C5179.33 (14)H1—O1—O2—H2113 (4)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.93 (4)1.75 (4)2.683 (3)173 (5)
O12—H3···O4i0.87 (5)1.93 (5)2.764 (4)160 (5)
O2—H2···O1ii0.97 (4)1.52 (4)2.446 (5)159 (4)
O12—H4···O1ii0.89 (5)1.92 (5)2.798 (5)172 (6)
N1—H11···O3iii0.82 (2)2.01 (2)2.8347 (18)178.1 (18)
N2—H21···O3iv0.93 (2)1.90 (2)2.8204 (18)170.3 (18)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x+1, y+1, z+2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H6N2O2·0.55H2O2·0.45H2O
Mr152.93
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)6.5047 (16), 19.194 (5), 5.6190 (13)
β (°) 110.078 (5)
V3)658.9 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.13
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.20 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART 1K
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.974, 0.987
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4556, 1733, 1174
Rint0.038
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.682
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.045, 0.108, 1.02
No. of reflections1733
No. of parameters147
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.23, 0.24

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2003), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.93 (4)1.75 (4)2.683 (3)173 (5)
O12—H3···O4i0.87 (5)1.93 (5)2.764 (4)160 (5)
O2—H2···O1ii0.97 (4)1.52 (4)2.446 (5)159 (4)
O12—H4···O1ii0.89 (5)1.92 (5)2.798 (5)172 (6)
N1—H11···O3iii0.82 (2)2.01 (2)2.8347 (18)178.1 (18)
N2—H21···O3iv0.93 (2)1.90 (2)2.8204 (18)170.3 (18)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1, y, z; (ii) x, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x+1, y+1, z+2; (iv) x, y+1, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds