To read this content please select one of the options below:

A systemic risk management model for SMEs under financial crisis

Simona Mihai Yiannaki (Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus)

International Journal of Organizational Analysis

ISSN: 1934-8835

Article publication date: 5 October 2012

4464

Abstract

Purpose

The “business‐risk” relationship across countries does not fit exactly into a “model” nor does it have a pure palliative effect. Following this idea, the purpose of this research is to reinforce a comparative study on small to medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) handling both risk and crisis management according to a new tailored model of a balance scorecard (BS). This new model of risk and crisis management aims at improving both SMEs' management adaptation and performance across all of crisis' stages, something not attempted so far in the literature.

Design/methodology/approach

The application of such a BS comes from the author's experience as a banker financing various SMEs industries, as a bank consultant on risk management, yet primarily from the results of a survey performed on a set of Romanian and Cypriot SMEs, equal‐proportionally selected from the area of trading, manufacturing, and services. The data regard the period 12/2008‐06/2011 as representative for the latest global financial crisis affecting the entire European Union region, too.

Findings

Coincidently or not, this study's results show a significant improvement of the financial performance of the SMEs who employed this model compared to those who did not.

Originality/value

This model's simplicity appeals to managers and regulators in understanding important business risks and crisis related phenomena. Backed by this idea, this research underpins a comparative study on SMEs handling risk and crisis management according to a new tailored model of a BS.

Keywords

Citation

Mihai Yiannaki, S. (2012), "A systemic risk management model for SMEs under financial crisis", International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 406-422. https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831211268607

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles