To read this content please select one of the options below:

Continuous product innovation: A comparison of key elements across different contingency sets

Ross L. Chapman (Ross L. Chapman is based at the InCITe Research Centre, Faculty of Business, University of Western Sydney Macarthur, PO Box 555, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia. E‐mail: r.chapman@uws.edu.au)
Charles Edward O’Mara (Charles Edward O’Mara is based at the InCITe Research Centre, Faculty of Business, University of Western Sydney Macarthur, PO Box 555, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.)
Stefano Ronchi (RStefano Ronchi is at the Politecnico di Milano, Department of Management and Manufacturing, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano. E‐mail: stefano.ronchi@polimi.it)
Mariano Corso (Mariano Corso is at the Università degli studi di Pisa, Via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 Pisa. E‐mail: mariano.corso@polimi.it)

Measuring Business Excellence

ISSN: 1368-3047

Article publication date: 1 September 2001

1635

Abstract

This paper discusses results from an international study of continuous improvement in product innovation. The empirical research is based upon a theoretical model of continuous product innovation (CPI) that identifies contingencies, behaviours, levers and performances relevant to improving product innovation processes. As successful knowledge management is widely recognised as a key capability for firms to successfully develop CPI, companies have been classified according to identified contingencies and the impact of these contingencies on key knowledge management criteria. Comparative analysis of the identified groups of companies has demonstrated important differences between the learning behaviours found present in the two groups thus identified, and in the levers used to develop and support these behaviours. The selection of performance measures by the two groups has highlighted further significant differences in the way the two groups understand and measure their CPI processes. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of appropriate mechanisms for firms with similar contingency sets to improve their approaches to organisational learning and product innovation.

Keywords

Citation

Chapman, R.L., O’Mara, C.E., Ronchi, S. and Corso, M. (2001), "Continuous product innovation: A comparison of key elements across different contingency sets", Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005866

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2001, MCB UP Limited

Related articles