Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T13:18:38.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“A Very Eden of the Innate Rights of Man”? A Marxist Look at the European Union Treaties and Case Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

In this paper I approach the European Union Treaties (Rome and Maastricht) and the European Court of Justice's jurisprudence from a Marxist standpoint. I argue that the treaties and case law of the European Union (EU) revolve around the rights of things (commodities), rather than of people. People primarily gain rights within the EU by demonstrating that they embody exchange value and are therefore personified commodities; people are not accorded rights merely for being human. In essence, the treaties and case law have enshrined Marx's notion of commodity fetishism, which Marx asserted to be a social mystification, into transparent law. Focusing on the grand scheme of the treaties' jurisdiction in this manner also illuminates the role of the court as it struggles to balance the demands of capital's self-valorization with fundamental human rights. I then consider the consequences of this balancing act for the EU integration process. I argue that this phenomenon as a whole also carries implications for EU civil society and for notions of legal equality among persons.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackers, Louise. 1994. Women, Citizenship, and European Community Law: The Gender Implications of the Free Movement Provisions. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 16: 391406.Google Scholar
Bieber, Roland, Dehousse, Renaud, Pinder, John and Weiler, Joseph, eds. 1988. 1992: One European Market? Baden Baden, Ger.: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Bieber, Roland, Dehousse, Renaud, Pinder, John and Weiler, Joseph. 1988. Back to the Future: Policy, Strategy, and Tactics of the White Paper on the Creation of a Single European Market. In Bieber, et al., eds. 1988.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1982. The Wheels of Commerce: Civilization and Capitalism 15th to 18th Century. Vol. 2. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica, and Weiler, Joseph, eds. 1985. Integration through Law. Vol. 1, bk. 3, Forces and Potential for a European Identity. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 1993a. A Single Market for Goods. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (CEC). 1993b. Consumer Rights in the Single Market. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Coppel, Jason. 1994. Rights, Duties and the End of Marshall. Modem Law Review 57 (6): 859–79.Google Scholar
Coppel, Jason, and O'Neill, Aidan. 1992. The European Court of Justice: Taking Rights Seriously Legal Studies 12: 227–45.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul. 1992. Once upon a Time in the West: Direct Effect and the Federalization of EEC Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (4): 453–79.Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, and de Burca, Grainne. 1995. EC Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtin, Deirdre, and O'Keeffe, David, eds. 1992. Constitutional Adjudication in European Community and National Law. Dublin: Butterworth.Google Scholar
De Burca, Grainne. 1993. Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (3): 283–19.Google Scholar
De Burca, Grainne. 1995. The Language of Rights and European Integration. In Shaw and More 1995.Google Scholar
D'Oliveira, Hans Ulrich Jessurun. 1995. Union Citizenship: Pie in the Sky? In Rosas and Antola 1995.Google Scholar
Easson, Alex. 1989. Legal Approaches to European Integration: The Role of Court and Legislator in the Completion of the European Common Market. Journal of European Integration 12 (2–3): 101–19.Google Scholar
Economist. 1996a. The Big Squeeze. Economist, 7 September, pp. 6970.Google Scholar
Economist. 1996b. Chalk and Cheese. Economist, 5 October, pp. 4849.Google Scholar
Economist. 1997. A Little EMU Enlightenment. Economist, 22 February, p. 88.Google Scholar
European Economic Community (EEC). 1957. Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community. Rome.Google Scholar
European Free Trade Association (EFTA). 1992. The EEA Agreement. EEA Bulletin 21 92. Geneva: Press and Information Service of the EFTA Secretariat.Google Scholar
European Union (EU). 1992. Treaty on European Union. Maastricht.Google Scholar
Everson, Michelle. 1995. The Legacy of the Market Citizen. In Shaw and More 1995.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant. 1985. Migrant Workers and Rights of Mobility in the European Community and the United States: A Study of Law, Community, and Citizenship in the Welfare State. In Cappelletti et al. 1985.Google Scholar
Green, Nicholas, Hartley, Trevor, Usher, John. 1991. The Legal Foundations of the Single European Market. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Greif, Aver, Milgrom, Paul, and Weingast, Barry. 1990. The Merchant Gild as a Nexus of Contracts. Working Paper Number 70. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford Law School.Google Scholar
Henning, C. Randall, Hochreiter, Eduard, and Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, eds. 1994. Reviving the European Union. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Hindley, Brian, and Howe, Martin. 1996. Better Off Out? The Benefits or Costs of EU Membership. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Holland, Stuart. 1980. UnCommon Market: Capital, Class, and Power in the European Community. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. G. 1992. Is the Court of Justice of the European Communities a Constitutional Court? In Curtin and O'Keeffe 1992.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. University Park, Pa.: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, John. 1988. Democracy and Civil Society. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Kommers, David, and Waelbroeck, Michel. 1985. Legal Integration and the Free Movement of Goods: The American and European Experience. In Cappelletti et al. 1985.Google Scholar
Lysen, Goran. 1992. Introduction till EG-Rdtten [Introduction to EC Law]. Uppsala, Sweden: Iustus Förlag.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1984. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. Federico. 1989. The Making of a Constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review 26: 595614.Google Scholar
Mancini, G. Federico. 1992. The Free Movement of Workers in the Case-Law of the European Court of Justice. In Curtin and O'Keeffe.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1967. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978. On the Jewish Question. In Tucker 1978.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1990. Capital Vol. 1. Trans. Fowkes, Ben. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. 1978. The Communist Manifesto. In Tucker 1978.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1990. The Gift. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
McGee, Andrew, and Weatherill, Stephen. 1990. The Evolution of the Single Market. Modem Law Review 53 (5): 578–96.Google Scholar
Meehan, Elizabeth. 1993. Citizenship and the European Community. Newbury Park, Cal.: 1993.Google Scholar
O'Leary, Siofra. 1995. The Social Dimension of Community Citizenship. In Rosas and Antola 1995.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Aidan. 1994. Decisions of the EC] and Their Constitutional Implications. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Thomas. 1994. European Union and the EFTA Countries: Enlargement and Integration. New York: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Phelan, Diarmuid Rossa. 1992. Right to Life of the Unborn v Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court of Justice and the Normative Shaping of the European Union. The Modem Law Review 55 (5): 670–89.Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe. 1996. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rigaux, François. 1992. EEC Competence in the Cultural Field. Forum Internationale 17: 314.Google Scholar
Rosas, Allan, and Antola, Esko, eds. 1995. A Citizen's Europe: In Search of a New Order. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shaw, Jo, and More, Gillian, eds. 1995. New Legal Dynamics of European Union. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1988. Protectionism, the American Supreme Court, and Integrated Markets. In Bieber, et al., eds. 1988.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert, ed. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ward, Ian. 1996a. The Margins of European Law. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Ian. 1996b. A Critical Introduction to European Law. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Forms of Creation of Rights. In Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1986. Eurocracy and Distrust: Some Questions Concerning the Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Fundamental Human Rights within the Legal Order of the European Communities. Washington Law Review 61: 1103–42.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1991. The Transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–83.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph. 1993. Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (4): 417–46.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph, and Lockhart, Nicolas. 1995. “Taking Rights Seriously” Seriously: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence. Common Market Law Review 32: 5194, 579–627.Google Scholar
Weiner, Merle. 1990. Fundamental Misconceptions about Fundamental Rights: The Changing Nature of Women's Rights in the EEC and Their Application in the United Kingdom. Harvard International Law Journal 31 (2): 565610.Google Scholar