Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T17:35:22.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gated Communities in Law's Gaze: Material Forms and the Production of a Social Body in Legal Adjudication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article focuses on the legal geography of gated communities. Sociolegal research has paid comparatively little attention to how specific material forms fare within legal contexts. Drawing on work in legal geography and in science and technology studies, this article isolates judicial decisions that deal with the borders of gated communities from other cases involving private homeowner associations. By focusing on these boundary disputes in which outsiders are excluded from the area, this article finds that courts are resisting the localism presented by gated communities and are instead articulating a social imaginary in which the landscape flows uninterrupted by the exclusionary presence of gates. In contrast to the privatopia literature, this article finds that courts are not complicit in promoting neoliberal visions of community. The social imaginary being developed by courts resists the spatial differentiation of gated communities, producing in its place a thoroughly modern polity in which legal, economic, and political relations flow easily between those inside and outside the gate.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alexander, Gregory. 1989. Dilemmas of Group Autonomy: Residential Associations and Community. Cornell Law Review 75 (1): 161.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arabian, Armand. 1995. Condos, Cats, and CC&Rs: Invasion of the Castle Common. Pepperdine Law Review 23 (1): 130.Google Scholar
Baker, Debra. 2000. Slamming the Door: NJ Court Lets Homeowners Turn Down Renters, Buyers on Megan's Law List. ABA Journal 86 (1): 2425.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. Mark Ritter . London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bible, Douglas, and Hsieh, Chengho. 2001. Gated Communities and Residential Property Values. Appraisal Journal 69 (2): 140–45.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, Stefan. 2000. Lawn and Order: Gated Communities and Social Interaction in Dana Point, California. PhD diss., Department of Geography, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Blakely, Edward, and Gail Snyder, Mary. 1997. Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 1998. Landscapes of Property. Law & Society Review 32 (3): 567612.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2004. Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2005. The Borrowed View: Privacy, Propriety, and the Entanglements of Property. Law & Social Inquiry 30 (4): 617–61.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas, and Bakan, Joel. 1992. Spacing Out: Towards a Critical Geography of Law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 30 (3): 661–90.Google Scholar
Brigham, John, and Gordon, Diana. 1996. Law in Politics: Struggles over Property and Public Space on New York City's Lower East Side. Law & Social Inquiry 21 (2): 265–83.Google Scholar
Callies, David, Franzese, Paula, and Kai Guth, Heidi. 2003. Ramapo Looking Forward: Gated Communities, Covenants, and Concerns. Urban Lawyer 35 (1): 177202.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 2004. Europe Wrestling with Technology. Economy & Society 33 (1): 121–34.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Padraic. 1999. Gated Community Can Exclude Tier 3 Megan's Law Registrants. New Jersey Law Journal 158 (8): 669.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 1995. Law's Community: Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch. 2003. The Craft of Property. California Law Review 91 (6): 1517–72.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Heller, Michael. 2001. The Liberal Commons. Yale Law Journal 110 (4): 549624.Google Scholar
Dale, Karen. 2005. Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Control. Organization 12 (5): 649–78.Google Scholar
Damstra, Richard. 2001. Don't Fence Us Out: The Municipal Power to Ban Gated Communities and the Federal Takings Clause. Valparaiso University Law Review 35 (3): 525–60.Google Scholar
Darian‐Smith, Eve. 1995. Rabies Rides the Fast Train: Transnational Interactions in Post‐Colonial Times. Law and Critique 6 (1): 7594.Google Scholar
Dear, Michael. 2002. Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a Debate. City & Community 1 (1): 532.Google Scholar
Dossett, William. 1992. Concerned Citizens of Brunswick County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Holden Beach Enterprises: Preserving Beach Access through Public Prescription. North Carolina Law Review 70 (4): 1289–333.Google Scholar
Dovey, Kim. 1999. Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duane Morris, LLP. 2000. New Jersey Report: NJ Superior Court Permits Exclusion for Megan's Law Offenders. Duane, Morris & Heckscher, Real Estate Review, Spring, 4.Google Scholar
Cove, Duncans Incorporated. The Courts on Mattie's Orchard. http://web.archive.org/web/20031205112502/http://duncanscove.com/Brochure.htm (accessed March 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Egan, Timothy. 1995. Many Seek Security in Private Communities. New York Times, September 3, A1.Google Scholar
Ferrell, David. 1985. Locking Up: Hollywood Hills Community Seeks to Shut out Crime with Mechanical Gates. Los Angeles Times, May 23, Westside Section, part 9, 1.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard. 1994. The Boundaries of Race: Political Geography in Legal Analysis. Harvard Law Review 107 (8): 1841–921.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard. 1999. Law's Territory (A History of Jurisdiction). Michigan Law Review 97 (4): 843930.Google Scholar
Franzese, Paula. 2002. Does It Take a Village? Privatization, Patterns of Restrictiveness and the Demise of Community. Villanova Law Review 47 (3): 553–94.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2000. The Culture of High Crime Societies: Some Preconditions of Recent “Law and Order” Policies. British Journal of Criminology 40 (3): 347–75Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Henry. 1999. A Test of the Power to Exclude. New Jersey Law Journal 156 (5): 361.Google Scholar
Greene, Abner. 1996. Kiryas Joel and Two Mistakes about Equality. Columbia Law Review 96 (1): 186.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin, and Ericson, Richard. 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–22.Google Scholar
Hansen, Homes. Aventura Bay Townhomes. http://www.hansenhomesaventura.com/aventurabaytownhomes.html (accessed March 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael. 1999. The Boundaries of Private Property. Yale Law Journal 108 (6): 1163–224.Google Scholar
Hook, Derek, and Vrdoljak, Michele. 2002. Gated Communities, Heterotopia and a “Rights” of Privilege: A “Heterotopology” of the South African Security‐Park. Geoforum 33 (2): 195219.Google Scholar
Isin, Engin, Osborne, Thomas, and Rose, Nikolas. 1998. Governing Cities: Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Advanced Liberalism. Urban Studies Working Paper (No. 19), York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Jones, Trevor, and Newburn, Tim. 1999. Urban Change and Policing: Mass Private Property Re‐Considered. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 7 (2): 225–44.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 1995. Residential Associations as State Actors: Regulating the Impact of Gated Communities on Nonmembers. Yale Law Journal 105 (3): 761–94.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Molnár, Virág. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28:167–95.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2002. La Fabrique du Droit: Une Ethnographie du Conseil d'Etat [The Factory of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'État] . Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Denise, and Low, Setha. 1990. The Built Environment and Spatial Form. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:453505.Google Scholar
Low, Setha. 2001. The Edge and the Center: Gated Communities and the Discourse of Urban Fear. American Anthropologist 103 (1): 4558.Google Scholar
Low, Setha. 2004. Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge Google Scholar
Madison, Michael. 2005. Law as Design: Objects, Concepts, and Digital Things. Case Western Reserve Law Review 56 (2): 381478.Google Scholar
Mawani, Renisa. 2005. Genealogies of the Land: Aboriginality, Law, and Territory in Vancouver's Stanley Park. Social & Legal Studies 14 (3): 315–39.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Evan. 1994. Privatopia: Homeowners Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, Penelope. 1992. Citizens Group Sues to Keep Streets in Neighborhood from Being Gated. Los Angeles Times, May 19, B2.Google Scholar
McMillan, Penelope. 1993. Judge Disallows Gates Blocking Public Streets. Los Angeles Times, January 23, A1.Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald. 1996. Anomalous Zones. Stanford Law Review 48 (5): 1197–234.Google Scholar
Owens, John. 1997. Westec Story: Gated Communities and the Fourth Amendment. American Criminal Law Review 34 (3): 1127–60.Google Scholar
Peñalver, Eduardo. 2005. Property as Entrance. Virginia Law Review 91 (8): 1889–972.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. 1995. Making a Social Body: British Cultural Formation, 1830–1864. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pue, W. Wesley. 1990. Wrestling with Law: (Geographical) Specificity vs. (Legal) Abstraction. Urban Geography 11 (6): 566–85.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1989. French Modern: Norms and Forms of the Social Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1998. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reichman, Uriel. 1976. Residential Private Governments: An Introductory Survey. University of Chicago Law Review 43 (2): 253306.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 1999. Models and Documents: Artefacts of International Legal Knowledge. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48 (4): 805–25.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2002. Scales and Spaces. City and Community 1 (1): 4850.Google Scholar
Schragger, Richard. 2001. The Limits of Localism. Michigan Law Review 100 (2): 371472.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Rebecca. 1997. Public Gated Residential Communities: The Rosemont, Illinois, Approach and Its Constitutional Implications. Urban Lawyer 29 (1): 123–44.Google Scholar
Sealey, Geraldine. 2000. “A Wholesale Dilemma: Megan's Law Creates Confusion in Real Estate Market,” abcnews.com, January 18. http://web.archive.org/web/20031005034711/http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/meganslaw000118.html (accessed March 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Siegel, Steven. 1998. The Constitution and Private Government: Toward the Recognition of Constitutional Rights in Private Residential Communities Fifty Years after Marsh v. Alabama . William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (2): 461564.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 2006. Governing Green Laboratories: Trust and Surveillance in the Cultures of Science. The 2006 John Ll. J. Edwards Memorial Lecture, October 17, University of Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, and Ewick, Patricia. 2003. The Architecture of Authority: The Place of Law in the Space of Science. In The Place of Law, ed. Sarat, Austin, Douglas, Lawrence, and Umphrey, Martha, 75108. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Soja, Edward. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2002. Modern Social Imaginaries. Public Culture 14 (1): 91124.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Law's Dream of a Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture 14 (1): 4990.Google Scholar
Wilson‐Doenges, Georjeanna. 2000. An Exploration of Sense of Community and Fear of Crime in Gated Communities. Environment and Behavior 32 (5): 597611.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, 391 U.S. 308 (1968).Google Scholar
Bein v. Brechtel‐Jochim Group, 6 Cal. App. 4th 1387 (1992); review denied, August 20, 1992.Google Scholar
Bixby Hill Community Association v. Rancho Los Alamitos Foundation. No. B156650 (Super. Ct. No. BC 258460), 2002 WL 1767429 (Cal.App. 2d Dist. 2002).Google Scholar
Blum v. Sea Gate Association, 253 A.D. 172 (N.Y. 1938).Google Scholar
Board of Managers of Le Trianon Condominium v. 1439 Realty, 186 A.D.2d 437 (N.Y. 1st Dep't 1992).Google Scholar
Citizens Against Gated Enclaves v. Whitley Heights Civic Association, 28 Cal. Rptr. 2d 451 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1994).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Fisher, 56 Pa. D. & C. 4th 143 (2001), affirmed, 821 A.2d 132 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2003), appeal denied, 575 Pa. 683 (2003).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Whritenour, 751 A.2d 687 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2000), appeal denied, 563 Pa. 701 (2000).Google Scholar
Concerned Citizens of Brunswick County Taxpayers Association v. Holden Beach Enterprises, 329 N.C. 37 (Sup. Ct. 1991).Google Scholar
Costine v. St. Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York, 173 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. 1st Dep't 1991).Google Scholar
Dore v. County of Ventura, 23 Cal. App. 4th 320 (2d Dist. 1994).Google Scholar
Drabinsky v. Seagate Association, 239 N.Y. 321 (1925).Google Scholar
Duffy v. St. Vincent's Hospital, 198 A.D.2d 31 (N.Y. 1st Dep't 1993).Google Scholar
Erit Realty v. Sea Gate Association, 223 A.D. 768 (N.Y. 1928), affirmed, 249 N.Y. 52 (1928), rehearing denied, 249 N.Y. 417 (1928).Google Scholar
Figueroa v. Fernandez, 921 F. Supp. 889 (D.P.R. 1996).Google Scholar
Fulop v. Sea Gate Association, 214 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. 1995), appeal denied, 216 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1995).Google Scholar
Guttenberg Taxpayers and Rentpayers Association v. Galaxy Towers Condominium Association, 296 N.J. Super. 101 (App. Div. 1995).Google Scholar
Harbor Company v. Copelan, 256 Ga. App. 79 (2002).Google Scholar
King v. Wood. No. A092363. Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. C98–01944, 2002 WL 15892 (Cal.App. 1st Dist. 2002).Google Scholar
Klink v. Township Council of Monroe, 181 N.J. Super. 25 (App.Div. 1981).Google Scholar
Laguna Publishing Company v. Golden Rain Foundation, 182 Cal. Rptr. 813 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1192 (1982).Google Scholar
Lake Arrowhead v. Jolliffe, 263 Neb. 354 (2002).Google Scholar
Landry and Landry v. Hilton Head Plantation Property Owners, 317 S.C. 200 (Ct. App. 1994).Google Scholar
Long Island Owners' Association v. Davidson, 965 S.W.2d 674 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi, 1998), petition for review denied, December 3, 1998.Google Scholar
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946).Google Scholar
Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Association, 471 A.2d 355 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1984).Google Scholar
Mayfield Heights v. Woodhawk Club Condominium Owners Association. No. 98–4163, 205 F.3d 1339 (Table), 2000 WL 191700 (6th Cir. February 3, 2000), cert denied, 531 U.S. 924 (2000).Google Scholar
Mulligan v. Panther Valley Property Owners Association (1999), WRN‐188–99 (N.J. Super. Ct, Warren County), reversed in part, 337 N.J. Super. 293 (App. Div. 2001).Google Scholar
New Jersey v. Kolcz, 114 N.J. Super. 408 (Cty. Ct. 1971).Google Scholar
New Jersey v. Panther Valley Property Owners Association, 307 N.J. Super. 319 (App. Div. 1998).Google Scholar
Norton v. Morningside Community Association. No. E027407 (Super.Ct. No. 089723), 2001 WL 1661568 (Cal.App. 4th Dist. 2001).Google Scholar
Oak Park Trust and Savings Bank v. Therkildsen, 209 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Penn Forest Township v. Bear Creek Lakes Civic Association, 147 Pa. Commw. 134 (1992).Google Scholar
Peres v. Sea Gate Association, 24 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. 2d Dep't 1965).Google Scholar
Richardson v. Deerwood Club, 589 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1991), rehearing denied, 16 Fla. L. Weekly D 3084 (Dist. Ct. App. 1st Dist. December 13, 1991).Google Scholar
Rocky Ridge Ranch Property Owners' Association v. Areaco Investment Company, 993 S.W.2d 553 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).Google Scholar
Rushfeldt v. Metropolitan Dade County, 630 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 3d Dist. 1994), review denied, 639 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1994).Google Scholar
Russell v. Palos Verdes Properties, 218 Cal. App. 2d 754 (2d Dist. 1963).Google Scholar
Stars' Desert Inn Hotel and Country Club v. Hwang, 105 F.3d 521 (9th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
Stover v. Las Vegas International Country Club Estates Home Owners Association, 95 Nev. 66 (Sup. Ct. 1979).Google Scholar
Surfside Colony v. California Coastal Commission, 226 Cal. App. 3d 1260 (4th Dist. 1991), rehearing denied, 91 D.A.R. 1996 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. February 14, 1991).Google Scholar
United States v. Harris. No. 99–5435, 6 Fed.App'x 304, 2001 WL 259159 (6th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
Uston v. Resorts International Hotels, 445 A.2d 370 (N.J. Dist. Ct. 1982).Google Scholar
West v. Slick, 313 N.C. 33 (Sup. Ct. 1985).Google Scholar
Wheeler v. State, 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 2546 (Dallas 1996).Google Scholar
William G. Mulligan Foundation for the Control of First Aid Squadders and Roving Paramedics v. Brooks, 312 N.J. Super. 353 (App. Div. 1998).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

California Vehicle Code. Cal. Veh. Code section 21101.6 (West Supp. 1995). Operative January 1, 1990.Google Scholar
New Jersey Condominum Act. N.J.S.A. 46:8B‐1. Eff. January 7, 1970.Google Scholar