Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve: Single Neuron Strength-Duration Functions in Deafened Animals

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Destruction of cochlear hair cells initiates degenerative changes within auditory nerve fibres (ANFs), including loss of peripheral processes and demyelination of the cell body. These changes are likely to affect the biophysical processes involved in action potential generation to an electrical stimulus. We measured the strength–duration relationship in acutely deafened (100% ANF survival) versus long-term deafened cochleae (∼15% ANF survival) by recording from single neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). Input/output functions were constructed for 22 ICC neurons in response to stimulation of the auditory nerve using biphasic current pulses of 20–1000 μs/phase. Strength–duration curves were derived and found to be of the same general form for both acute and long-term deafened cochleae. While there was an increase in rheobase for neurons from long-term versus acute deafened cochleae, this increase was not statistically significant (p=0.097). In contrast, chronaxie—which is related to the membrane time constant—was significantly shorter in the long-term deafened cochleae (p=0.004). This presumably reflects a shift in the site of action potential initiation to the larger diameter, heavily myelinated central axon as a result of the pathology. These changes in the site of action potential generation have implications for the delivery of charge to ANFs via cochlear implants. © 2001 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC01: 4364Me, 4364Pg, 8719Nn, 8717Nn

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

RFERENCES

  1. Abbas, P. J., and C. J. Brown. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: Refractory properties and strengthduration functions. Hear. Res. 51:139–148, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bostock, H.. The strength-duration relationship for excitation of myelinated nerve: computed dependence on membrane parameters. J. Physiol. (London) 341:59–74, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bostock, H., T. A. Sears, and R. M. Sherratt. The spatial distribution of excitability and membrane current in normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. J. Physiol. (London) 341:41–58, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colombo, J., and C. W. Parkins. A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hear. Res. 31:287–312, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardie, N. A., and R. K. Shepherd. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem. Hear. Res. 128:147–165, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishikawa, M., T. Ohira, N. Yamaguchi, M. Takase, H. Bertalanffy, T. Kawase, and S. Toya. Strength-duration curve of conductive spinal cord evoked potentials in cats. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100:261–268, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Javel, E., and R. K. Shepherd. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: III Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear. Res. 140:45–76, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koles, Z. J., and M. A. Rasminsky. A computer simulation of conduction in demyelinated nerve fibres. J. Physiol. (London) 227:351–364, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leake, P. A., and G. T. Hradek. Cochlear pathology of longterm neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear. Res. 33:11–34, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liberman, M. C., and M. E. Oliver. Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve. Correlations with functional properties. J. Comp. Neurol. 223:163–176, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Loeb, G. E., M. W. White, and W. M. Jenkins. Biophysical considerations in electrical stimulation of the auditory nervous system. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405:123–136, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. McKay, C. M., and H. J. McDermott. Perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:998–1009, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McNeal, D. R.. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 23:329–337, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, A. L., D. W. Smith, and B. E. Pfingst. Across species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses. Hear. Res. 135:47–55, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nowak, L. G., and J. Bullier. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements. Exp. Brain Res. 118:477–488, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parkins, C. W., and J. Colombo. Auditory-nerve singleneuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes. Hear. Res. 31:267–285, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parkins, C. W., and L. Li, Comparison of the strength-duration functions elicited from cochlear implants recorded from the inferior colliculus, viiith nerve single neurons, and behaviorally. In: Advances in Cochlear Implants, edited by I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer and E. S. Hochmair. Wein: Manz, 1994, pp. 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pfingst, B. E., D. R. DeHaan, and L. A. Holloway. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1857–1866, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rank, J. B.. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review. Brain Res. 98:417–437, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shepherd, R. K., and E. Javel. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear. Res. 108:112–144, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shepherd, R. K., and E. Javel. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties. Hear. Res. 130:171–188, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shepherd, R. K., J. H. Baxi, and N. A. Hardie. Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. J. Neurophysiol. 82:1363–1380, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, D. W., and C. C. Finley. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical and strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:2228–2237, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spoendlin, H.. Factors inducing retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 112:76–82, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tasaki, I.. New measurements of the capacity and the resistance of the myelin sheath and the nodal membrane of the isolated frog nerve fiber. Am. J. Physiol. 181:639–650, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  26. van den Honert, C., and J. T. Mortimer. The response of the myelinated nerve fiber to short duration biphasic currents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 7:117–125, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  27. van den Honert, C., and P. H. Stypulkowski. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14:225–243, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Voorhees, C. R., W. D. Voorhees, L. A. Geddes, J. D. Bourland, and M. Hinds. The chronaxie for myocardium and motor nerve in the dog with chest-surface electrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:624–628, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Communications Research Centre, Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

    Robert K. Shepherd, Natalie A. Hardie & Jagir H. Baxi

Authors
  1. Robert K. Shepherd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalie A. Hardie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jagir H. Baxi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shepherd, R.K., Hardie, N.A. & Baxi, J.H. Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve: Single Neuron Strength-Duration Functions in Deafened Animals. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 29, 195–201 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1355276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1355276

Search

Navigation