Abstract
In a recent paper, we described the behavior of the cardiac electric near-field, E, parallel to the tissue surface during continuous conduction. We found that TE, the time at which the peak near-field, \(\hat E\), occurs, is an accurate marker of local activation time. Examination of experimentally recorded E vector loops revealed a large variety of morphologies. We postulated that propagation around an obstacle could lead to the observed deviations in loop morphology. The purpose of this study was to determine if this was plausible, and if so, whether TE remains an accurate time marker of local activation under these conditions. We used a monodomain computer model of a sheet of cardiac tissue with a central conduction obstacle immersed in an unbounded volume conductor. Activation times \(T_{I_m } \), TΦ, and TE were derived from the transmembrane current Im, the extracellular potential Φ e, and E, respectively. The obstacle led to deformations of the vector loops, morphologically similar to those observed experimentally, particularly during the initial and terminal phases, and to a lesser degree near the time of \(\hat E\). Despite these loop deformations, TE was an accurate time marker of local activation. We found that TE was significantly closer to \(T_{I_m } \) than TΦ. We concluded that isochrone maps computed from TE better reflect intracellular activation patterns than those computed from TΦ. For a given electrode spacing of 60 μm, the sensitivity to noise of E was significantly less than that of \(\dot \phi _e \). Hence, TE was less affected by noise than TΦ.© 2003 Biomedical Engineering Society.
PAC2003: 8719Nn, 8719Hh, 8780Tq
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, K. P., R. Walker, R. R. Ershler, M. Fuller, T. Dustman, R. Menlove, S. V. Karwandee, and R. L. Lux. Determination of local myocardial electrical activation for activation sequence mapping. A statistical approach. Circ. Res.69:898–917, 1991.
Azene, E. M., N. A. Trayanova, and E. Warman. Wave-front-obstacle interactions in cardiac tissue: A computational study. Ann. Biomed. Eng.29:35–46, 2001.
Arisi, G., E. Macchi, C. Corradi, R. L. Lux, and B. Taccardi. Epicardial excitation during ventricular pacing. Circ. Res.71:840–849, 1992.
Bayly, P. V., B. H. K. Knight, G. M. Rogers, R. E. Hillsley, R. E. Ideker, and W. M. Smith. Estimation of conduction velocity vector fields from epicardial mapping data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.45 5:563–571, 1998.
Cabo, C., A. M. Pertsov, W. T. Baxter, J. M. Davidenko, R. A. Gray, and J. Jalife. Wave-front curvature as a cause of slow conduction and block in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ. Res.75:1014–1028, 1994.
Efimov, I. R., D. T. Huang, J. M. Rendt, and G. Salama. Optical mapping of repolarization and refractoriness from intact hearts. Circulation90:1469–1480, 1994.
Fast, V. G., and A. G. Kleber. Microscopic conduction in cultured strands of neonatal rat heart cells measured with voltage-sensitive dyes. Circ. Res.73:914–925, 1993.
Geselowitz, D. B., R. C. Barr, M. S. Spach, and W. T. Miller, III. The impact of adjacent isotropic fluids on electrograms from anisotropic cardiac muscle—A modeling study. Circ. Res.51:602–613, 1982.
Gillis, A. M., V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber. Spatial changes in transmembrane potential during extracellular electrical shocks in cultured monolayers of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Circ. Res.79:676–690, 1996.
Goette, A., T. Staack, C. Rocken, M. Arndt, J. C. Geller, C. Huth, S. Ansorge, H. U. Klein, and U. Lendeckel. Increased expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme in humanatria during atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35:1669–1677, 2000.
Hofer, E., G. Urban, M. S. Spach, I. Schafferhofer, G. Mohr, and D. Platzer. Measuring activation patterns of the heart at a microscopic size scale with thin-film sensors. Am. J. Physiol.266:H2136–H2145, 1994.
Hooke, N., C. S. Henriquez, P. Lanzkron, and D. Rose. Linear algebraic transformations of the bidomain equations: Implications for numerical methods. Math. Biosci.120:127–145, 1994.
Horner, S. M., Z. Vespalcova, and M. J. Lab. Electrode for recording direction of activation, conduction velocity, and monophasic action potential of myocardium. Heart Circ. Physiol.41:H1917–H1927, 1997.
Isomoto, S., M. Fukatani, A. Konoe, M. Tanigawa, O. A. Centurion, S. Seto, T. Hashimoto, M. Kadena, A. Shimizu, and K. Hashiba. The influence of advancing age on the electrophysiological changes of the atrial muscle induced by programed atrial stimulation. Jpn. Circ. J.56:776–782, 1992.
Kadish, A. H., J. F. Spear, J. H. Levine, R. F. Hanich, C. Prood, and E. N. Moore. Vector mapping of myocardial activation. Circulation74:603–615, 1986.
Knisley, S. B., T. F. Blitchington, B. C. Hill, A. O. Grant, W. M. Smith, T. C. Pilkington, and R. E. Ideker. Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. Circ. Res.72:255–270, 1993.
Leon, L. J., and F. X. Witkowski. Calculation of transmembrane current from extracellular potential recordings: A model study. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.6:379–390, 1995.
Luo, C., and Y. Rudy. A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization and their interaction. Circ. Res.68:1501–1526, 1991.
Maglaveras, N., J. M. T. de Bakker, F. J. L. van Capelle, C. Pappas, and M. J. Janse. Activation delay in healed myocardial infarction: A comparison between model and experiment. Am. J. Physiol.269:H1441–H1449, 1995.
Muzikant, A. L., and C. S. Henriquez. Validation of three-dimensional conduction models using experimental mapping: Are we getting closer?Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.69:205–223, 1998.
Ndrepepa, G., E. B. Caref, H. Yin, N. el-Sherif, and M. Restivo. Activation time determination by high-resolution unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms in the canine heart. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.6:174–188, 1995.
Pertsov, A. Scale of geometric structures responsible for discontinuous propagation in myocardial tissue. In: Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart, edited by P. M. Spooner, R. W. Joyner, and J. Jalife. Armonk: Futura, 1997, pp. 273–293.
Plank, G., and E. Hofer. Model study of vector-loop morphology during electrical mapping of microscopic conduction in cardiac tissue. Ann. Biomed. Eng.28:1244–1252, 2000.
Rohr, S., and J. P. Kucera. Optical recording system based on a fiber optic image conduit: Assessment of microscopic activation patterns in cardiac tissue. Biophys. J.75:1062–1075, 1998.
Spach, M. S.Relating the sodium current and conductance to the shape of transmembrane and extracellular potentials by simulation: Effects of propagation boundaries. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.10:743–755, 1985.
Spach, M. S., and P. C. Dolber. Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at microscopic level in human cardiac muscle: Evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ. Res.58:356–371, 1986.
Spooner, P. M., R. W. Joyner, and J. Jalife. Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart. Armonk: Futura, 1997.
Starobin, J. M., Y. I. Zilberter, E. M. Rusnak, and C. F. Starmer. Wavelet formation in excitable cardiac tissue: The role of wave-front-obstacle interactions in initiating high-frequency fibrillatory-like arrhythmias. Biophys. J.70:581–594, 1996.
Suenson, M.Interaction between ventricular cells during the early part of excitation in the ferret heart. Acta Physiol. Scand.125:81–90, 1985.
Windisch, H., W. Müller, and H. A. Tritthart. Fluorescence monitoring of rapid changes in membrane potential in heart muscle. Biophys. J.48:877–884, 1985.
Witkowski, F. X., K. M. Kavanagh, P. A. Penkoske, and R. Plonsey. estimation of cardiac transmembrane current. Circ. Res.72:424–439, 1993.
Worley, S. J., W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker. Construction of a multipolar electrode system referenced and anchored to endocardium for study of arrhythmias. Am. J. Physiol.250:H530–H536, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plank, G., Hofer, E. Use of Cardiac Electric Near-Field Measurements to Determine Activation Times. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31, 1066–1076 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1603258
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1603258