Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Cardiac Electric Near-Field Measurements to Determine Activation Times

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper, we described the behavior of the cardiac electric near-field, E, parallel to the tissue surface during continuous conduction. We found that TE, the time at which the peak near-field, \(\hat E\), occurs, is an accurate marker of local activation time. Examination of experimentally recorded E vector loops revealed a large variety of morphologies. We postulated that propagation around an obstacle could lead to the observed deviations in loop morphology. The purpose of this study was to determine if this was plausible, and if so, whether TE remains an accurate time marker of local activation under these conditions. We used a monodomain computer model of a sheet of cardiac tissue with a central conduction obstacle immersed in an unbounded volume conductor. Activation times \(T_{I_m } \), TΦ, and TE were derived from the transmembrane current Im, the extracellular potential Φ e, and E, respectively. The obstacle led to deformations of the vector loops, morphologically similar to those observed experimentally, particularly during the initial and terminal phases, and to a lesser degree near the time of \(\hat E\). Despite these loop deformations, TE was an accurate time marker of local activation. We found that TE was significantly closer to \(T_{I_m } \) than TΦ. We concluded that isochrone maps computed from TE better reflect intracellular activation patterns than those computed from TΦ. For a given electrode spacing of 60 μm, the sensitivity to noise of E was significantly less than that of \(\dot \phi _e \). Hence, TE was less affected by noise than TΦ2003 Biomedical Engineering Society.

PAC2003: 8719Nn, 8719Hh, 8780Tq

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, K. P., R. Walker, R. R. Ershler, M. Fuller, T. Dustman, R. Menlove, S. V. Karwandee, and R. L. Lux. Determination of local myocardial electrical activation for activation sequence mapping. A statistical approach. Circ. Res.69:898–917, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azene, E. M., N. A. Trayanova, and E. Warman. Wave-front-obstacle interactions in cardiac tissue: A computational study. Ann. Biomed. Eng.29:35–46, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arisi, G., E. Macchi, C. Corradi, R. L. Lux, and B. Taccardi. Epicardial excitation during ventricular pacing. Circ. Res.71:840–849, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bayly, P. V., B. H. K. Knight, G. M. Rogers, R. E. Hillsley, R. E. Ideker, and W. M. Smith. Estimation of conduction velocity vector fields from epicardial mapping data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.45 5:563–571, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabo, C., A. M. Pertsov, W. T. Baxter, J. M. Davidenko, R. A. Gray, and J. Jalife. Wave-front curvature as a cause of slow conduction and block in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ. Res.75:1014–1028, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Efimov, I. R., D. T. Huang, J. M. Rendt, and G. Salama. Optical mapping of repolarization and refractoriness from intact hearts. Circulation90:1469–1480, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fast, V. G., and A. G. Kleber. Microscopic conduction in cultured strands of neonatal rat heart cells measured with voltage-sensitive dyes. Circ. Res.73:914–925, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geselowitz, D. B., R. C. Barr, M. S. Spach, and W. T. Miller, III. The impact of adjacent isotropic fluids on electrograms from anisotropic cardiac muscle—A modeling study. Circ. Res.51:602–613, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gillis, A. M., V. G. Fast, S. Rohr, and A. G. Kleber. Spatial changes in transmembrane potential during extracellular electrical shocks in cultured monolayers of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. Circ. Res.79:676–690, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goette, A., T. Staack, C. Rocken, M. Arndt, J. C. Geller, C. Huth, S. Ansorge, H. U. Klein, and U. Lendeckel. Increased expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and angiotensin-converting enzyme in humanatria during atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35:1669–1677, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofer, E., G. Urban, M. S. Spach, I. Schafferhofer, G. Mohr, and D. Platzer. Measuring activation patterns of the heart at a microscopic size scale with thin-film sensors. Am. J. Physiol.266:H2136–H2145, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hooke, N., C. S. Henriquez, P. Lanzkron, and D. Rose. Linear algebraic transformations of the bidomain equations: Implications for numerical methods. Math. Biosci.120:127–145, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horner, S. M., Z. Vespalcova, and M. J. Lab. Electrode for recording direction of activation, conduction velocity, and monophasic action potential of myocardium. Heart Circ. Physiol.41:H1917–H1927, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Isomoto, S., M. Fukatani, A. Konoe, M. Tanigawa, O. A. Centurion, S. Seto, T. Hashimoto, M. Kadena, A. Shimizu, and K. Hashiba. The influence of advancing age on the electrophysiological changes of the atrial muscle induced by programed atrial stimulation. Jpn. Circ. J.56:776–782, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kadish, A. H., J. F. Spear, J. H. Levine, R. F. Hanich, C. Prood, and E. N. Moore. Vector mapping of myocardial activation. Circulation74:603–615, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knisley, S. B., T. F. Blitchington, B. C. Hill, A. O. Grant, W. M. Smith, T. C. Pilkington, and R. E. Ideker. Optical measurements of transmembrane potential changes during electric field stimulation of ventricular cells. Circ. Res.72:255–270, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leon, L. J., and F. X. Witkowski. Calculation of transmembrane current from extracellular potential recordings: A model study. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.6:379–390, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, C., and Y. Rudy. A model of the ventricular cardiac action potential. Depolarization and their interaction. Circ. Res.68:1501–1526, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maglaveras, N., J. M. T. de Bakker, F. J. L. van Capelle, C. Pappas, and M. J. Janse. Activation delay in healed myocardial infarction: A comparison between model and experiment. Am. J. Physiol.269:H1441–H1449, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muzikant, A. L., and C. S. Henriquez. Validation of three-dimensional conduction models using experimental mapping: Are we getting closer?Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.69:205–223, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ndrepepa, G., E. B. Caref, H. Yin, N. el-Sherif, and M. Restivo. Activation time determination by high-resolution unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms in the canine heart. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.6:174–188, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pertsov, A. Scale of geometric structures responsible for discontinuous propagation in myocardial tissue. In: Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart, edited by P. M. Spooner, R. W. Joyner, and J. Jalife. Armonk: Futura, 1997, pp. 273–293.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Plank, G., and E. Hofer. Model study of vector-loop morphology during electrical mapping of microscopic conduction in cardiac tissue. Ann. Biomed. Eng.28:1244–1252, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rohr, S., and J. P. Kucera. Optical recording system based on a fiber optic image conduit: Assessment of microscopic activation patterns in cardiac tissue. Biophys. J.75:1062–1075, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spach, M. S.Relating the sodium current and conductance to the shape of transmembrane and extracellular potentials by simulation: Effects of propagation boundaries. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.10:743–755, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spach, M. S., and P. C. Dolber. Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at microscopic level in human cardiac muscle: Evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ. Res.58:356–371, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spooner, P. M., R. W. Joyner, and J. Jalife. Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart. Armonk: Futura, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Starobin, J. M., Y. I. Zilberter, E. M. Rusnak, and C. F. Starmer. Wavelet formation in excitable cardiac tissue: The role of wave-front-obstacle interactions in initiating high-frequency fibrillatory-like arrhythmias. Biophys. J.70:581–594, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suenson, M.Interaction between ventricular cells during the early part of excitation in the ferret heart. Acta Physiol. Scand.125:81–90, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Windisch, H., W. Müller, and H. A. Tritthart. Fluorescence monitoring of rapid changes in membrane potential in heart muscle. Biophys. J.48:877–884, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Witkowski, F. X., K. M. Kavanagh, P. A. Penkoske, and R. Plonsey. estimation of cardiac transmembrane current. Circ. Res.72:424–439, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Worley, S. J., W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker. Construction of a multipolar electrode system referenced and anchored to endocardium for study of arrhythmias. Am. J. Physiol.250:H530–H536, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plank, G., Hofer, E. Use of Cardiac Electric Near-Field Measurements to Determine Activation Times. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 31, 1066–1076 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1603258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.1603258

Navigation