Skip to main content
Log in

Bacterial and primary production in the pelagic zone of the Kara Sea

  • Marine Biology
  • Published:
Oceanology Aims and scope

Abstract

Data on the bacterial and primary production, which were obtained simultaneously for the same water samples, are presented for three regions of the Kara Sea. The samples were collected for the transect westwards of the Yamal Peninsula, along the St. Anna Trough, and the transect in Ob Bay. Direct counts of the DAPI-stained bacterial cells were performed. The bacterial production and grazing rates were determined using a direct method when metabolic inhibitors vancomycin and penicillin were added. The primary production rates were estimated using the 14C method.

The average primary production was 112.6, 58.5, and 28.7 mg C m−2 day−1, and the bacterial production was 12.8, 48.9, and 81.6 mg C m−2 day−1 along the Yamal Peninsula, the St. Anna Trough, and Ob Bay, respectively. The average bacterial carbon demand was 34.6, 134.5, and 220.4 mg C m−2 day−1 for these regions, respectively. The data obtained lead us to conclude that the phytoplankton-synthesized organic matter is generally insufficient to satisfy the bacterial carbon demand and may be completely assimilated via the heterotrophic processes in the marine ecosystems. Therefore, the bacterial activity and, consequently, the amount of the synthesized biomass (i.e., the production) both depend directly on the phytoplankton’s condition and activity. We consider these relationships to be characteristics of the Kara Sea’s biota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. I. Vedernikov, A. B. Demidov, and A. I. Sud’bin, “Primary Production and Chlorophyll in the Kara Sea in September 1993,” Okeanologiya 34(5), 693–703 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. G. Vinberg, Yu. G. Kabanova, O. I. Koblents-Mishke, et al., Guidelines to Determination of Primary Production of Organic Matter in Water Bodies by the Radiocarbon Method (Izd. Belorus. Univ., Minsk, 1960) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. E. Vinogradov, V. I. Vedernikov, E. A. Romankevich, and A. A. Vetrov, “Components of the Carbon Cycle in the Russian Arctic Seas: Primary Production and Flux of Corg from the Photic Layer,” Okeanologiya 40(2), 221–233 (2000) [Oceanology 40 (2), 204–215 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. E. Vinogradov and E. A. Shushkina, Functioning of Planktonic Communities in the Epipelagic Zones of the Ocean (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. N. Mitskevich and B. B. Namsaraev, “Abundance and Distribution of Bacterioplankton in the Kara Sea in September 1993,” Okeanologiya 34(5), 704–708 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. D. Romanova and A. F. Sazhin, “Relationship between the Volume of a Bacterial Cell and the Content of Carbon in It,” Okeanologiya 50(4), 556–565 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. N. Sukhanova, “Report of the Phytoplankton and Primary Production Team,” in Report on Work in Cruise 54 of R/V “Akademik Mstislav Keldysh”, Vol. 3: Team Leader Reports (Archive of Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2007), pp. 29–38.

  8. I. N. Sukhanova, M. V. Flint, S. A. Mosharov, and V. M. Sergeeva, “Phytoplanktonic Community Structure and Primary Production in the Ob Estuary and in Adjacent Shelf,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 785–800 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. V. Flint, “Cruise 54 of R/V “Akademik Mstislav Keldysh” in the Kara Sea,” Okeanologiya 50(5), 677–682 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. M. W. Amon and B. Meon, “The Biogeochemistry of Dissolved Organic Matter and Nutrients in Two Large Arctic Estuaries and Potential Implications for Our Understanding of the Arctic Ocean System,” Mar. Chem. 92, 311–330 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Caron, “Technique for Enumeration of Heterotrophic Nanoplankton Using Epifluorescence Microscopy, and Comparison with Other Procedures,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 46, 491–498 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. J. Cole, S. Findlay, and M. L. Pace, “Bacterial Production in Fresh and Saltwater Ecosystems: A Cross-System Overview,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 43, 1–10 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. W. Ducklow and C. A. Carlson, “Oceanic Bacterial Production,” Adv. Microb. Ecol. 12, 113–181 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. W. Duclow and F. K. Shiah, Aquatic Microbiology: An Ecological Approach, Ed. by T. G. Ford (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, 1993), pp. 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. E. Hobbie, R. J. Daley, and S. Jasper, “Use of Nucklepore Filters for Counting Bacteria by Fluorescence Microscopy,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35(5), 1225–1228 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. A. Hoff, Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Ed. by P. F. Kemp et al. (Lewis Publ., Boca Raton, Fla., 1993), pp. 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O. Holm-Hansen and B. Riemann, “Chlorophyll a Determination: Improvements in Methodology,” Oikos 30, 438–447 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Meon and R. M. W. Amon, “Heterotrophic Bacterial Activity and Fluxes of Dissolved Free Amino Acids and Glucose in the Arctic Rivers Ob, Yenisei and the Adjacent Kara Sea,” Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 37, 121–135 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Nagata, Microbial Ecology of the Oceans, Ed. by D. L. Kirchman (Wiley, New York, 2000), pp. 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. Nejstgaard, L. J. Naustvoll, and A. F. Sazhin, “Correcting for Underestimation of Microzooplankton Grazing in Bottle Incubation Experiments with Mesozooplankton,” Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 221, 59–75 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Pabi, G. L. van Dijken, and K. L. Arrigo, “Primary Production in the Arctic Ocean, 1998-2006,” J. Geophys. Res. 113(C08005), doi:10.1029/2007JC004578 (2008).

  22. R. B. Rivkin, M. R. Anderson, and Lajzerowicz, “Microbial Processes in Cold Ocean. 1. Relationship between Temperature and Bacterial Growth Rate,” Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 10, 243–254 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Sakshaug, The Organic Carbon Cycle in the Arctic Ocean, Ed. by R. Stein and R. W. Macdonald (Springer, Berlin, New York, 2004), pp. 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. F. Sherr, E. B. Sherr, T. L. Andrew, et al., “Trophic Interactions between Heterotrophic Protozoa and Bacterioplankton in Estuarine Water Analyzed with Selective Metabolic Inhibitors,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 32, 169–179 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. V. Subba and T. Platt, “Primary Production of Arctic Waters,” Polar Biol. 3, 191–201 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Weisse, “The Microbial Loop in the Red Sea: Dynamics of Pelagic Bacteria and Heterotrophic Nanoflagellates,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 55, 241–250 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. F. Sazhin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.F. Sazhin, N.D. Romanova, S.A. Mosharov, 2010, published in Okeanologiya, 2010, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 801–808.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sazhin, A.F., Romanova, N.D. & Mosharov, S.A. Bacterial and primary production in the pelagic zone of the Kara Sea. Oceanology 50, 759–765 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437010050127

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437010050127

Keywords

Navigation