Skip to main content
Log in

Calculation of the interplanetary magnetic field based on its value in the solar photosphere

  • Published:
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The difficulties associated with calculating the parameters of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) from solar magnetic data have been considered. All conventional calculation patterns and available input databases have been analyzed from a unified standpoint. It has been shown that these assumptions and limitations cannot affect the general structure and dependence on cycle of solar and interplanetary data. At the same time, the measured solar field values are underestimated as a result of the magnetograph signal saturation effect. It has been shown that the correction should depend on the heliocentric observation latitude and cycle phase. The correction method responsible for good agreement between the calculated and measured values has been proposed. The created database makes it possible to quantitatively calculate the magnetic fields in the solar wind near the Earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. D. Altschuler and G. Newkirk, Jr., “Magnetic Fields and the Structure of the Solar Corona,” Sol. Phys. 9, 131–149 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. G. Badalyan, V. N. Obridko, and J. Sykora, “Polarization in the 530.3 nm Emission Line and Coronal Magnetic Field Structure,” Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnate Pleso 32, 175–189 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. G. Badalyan, V. N. Obridko, and J. Sykora, “Relation between the Green-Line Polarization of the Solar Corona and Coronal Magnetic Fields,” Astron. Zh. 76(11), 869–880 (1999) [Astron. Rep. 76 (11), 767 (1999)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Biermann, “Solar Corpuscular Variation and the Interplanetary Gas,” Observatory 77, 109–110 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. L. Demidov, “On the Manifestation of Magnetic Flux Tubes in Observations of the Mean and Background Magnetic Fields of the Sun,” Astron. Soc. Pac. Conf. Series 140, 171–178, (1998a).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. L. Demidov, “The Magnetic Sun from Different Views: A Comparison of the Mean and Background Magnetic Field Observations Made in Different Observatories and in Different Spectral Lines,” J. Astrophys. Astron. 21(3/4), 209–212 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. L. Demidov, “Comparison of Large-Scale Solar Magnetic Fields Observed in Different Spectral Lines,” Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz. 62(9), 1830–1834 (1998b).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. N. Frazier and J. O. Stenflo, “On the Small-Scale Structure of Solar Magnetic Fields,” Sol. Phys. 27, 330–346 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. I. Gopasyuk, V. A. Kotov, A. B. Sevemy, and T. T. Tsap, “The Comparison of the Magnetographic Magnetic Field Measured in Different Spectral Lines,” Sol. Phys. 31, 307–316 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer, The Solar Magnetic Field (Rep. UAG-94, NOAA, Boulder, (1986).

  11. J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer, “The Solar Magnetic Field Measured in Different Spectral Lines,” Sol. Phys. 31, 307–316 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Howard and J. O. Stenflo, “On the Filamentary Nature of Solar Magnetic Fields,” Sol. Phys. 22, 402–417 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. V. Ivanov and V. N. Obridko, “The Cyclic Variations of the CME Velocity,” Sol. Phys. 19, 179–196 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. V. Ivanov, V. N. Obridko, E. V. Nepomnyashchaya, and N. V. Kutilina, “Relevance of CME to the Structure of Large-Scale Solar Magnetic Fields,” Sol. Phys. 184, 369–384 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V. N. Obridko, A. F. Kharshiladze, and B. D. Shelting, “On Calculating the Solar Wind Parameters from the Solar Magnetic Field Data,” Astron. Astrophys. Trans. 11, 65–79 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. N. Obridko and B. D. Shelting, “Cyclic Variation of the Global Magnetic Field Indices,” Sol. Phys. 137, 167–177 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. N. Obridko and B. D. Shelting, “Structure and Cyclic Variations of Open Magnetic Fields,” Sol. Phys. 187, 185–205 (1999a).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. N. Obridko and B. D. Shelting, “Structure of the Heliospheric Current Sheet as Considered over a Long Time Interval (1915–1996),” Sol. Phys. 184, 187–200 (1999b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. V. N. Obridko, Sunspots and Activity Complexes (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. N. Obridko, A. F. Kharshiladze, and B. D. Shelting, “Certain Methodical Problems of Calculating Harmonic Coefficients of Global Magnetic Fields,” in Solar Magnetic Fields and Helioseismology (FTI, St. Petersburg, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. N. Obridko, B. D. Shelting, and A. F. Kharshiladze, “Multiparametric Calculations of the Solar Wind Parameters from Data on the Solar Magnetic Field,” Astron. Vestn. 38(3), 261–272 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. N. Parker, “Dynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields,” Astrophys. J. 128, 664–676 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. H. Shatten, J. M. Wilcox, and N. F. Ness, “A Model of Interplanetary and Coronal Magnetic Fields,” Sol. Phys. 19, 442–455 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. B. Snodgrass, J. M. Kress, and P. R. Wilson, “Observations of the Polar Magnetic Fields during the Polarity Reversals of Cycle 22,” Sol. Phys. 191, 1–19 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. O. Stenflo, “Magnetic Field Structure of the Photospheric Network,” Sol. Phys. 32, 41–63 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. O. Stenflo and M. Vogel, “Global Resonances in the Evolution of the Solar Magnetic Field,” Nature 319(6051), 285–290 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Svalgaard, T. L. Duvall, Jr., and P. M. Scherrer, “The Strength of the Sun’s Polar Field,” Sol. Phys. 58, 225–240 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Sykora, O. G. Badalyan, and V. N. Obridko, “Relationship between the Coronal Shape and the Magnetic Field Topology during the Solar Cycle,” Adv. Space Res. C. 29, 395–400 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. K. Ulrich, “Analysis of Magnetic Flux Tubes on the Solar Surface from Measurements at Mt. Wilson of λ5250 and λ5233,” in Proceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, Boulder, 1987, Ed. by J. L. Linsky and R. E. Stencel (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. H. Wang, S. T. Wu, M. Dryer, et al., “Analyses and Modeling of Coronal Holes Observed by CORONAS-I: MHD Simulation,” in Proceedings of the Third SOLTIP Symposium, Beijing, China, 1996, pp. 41–48.

  31. Y. M. Wang and N. R. Sheeley, “On Potential Field Models of the Solar Corona,” Astrophys. J. 392, 310–319 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Y. M. Wang and N. R. Sheeley, “Solar Implications of ULYSSES Interplanetary Field Measurements,” Astrophys. J. 447, L143–L146 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Y. M. Wang and N. R. Sheeley, “The Long-Term Variation of the Sun’s Open Magnetic Flux,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 505–508 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. G. Wibberenz, I. G. Richardson, and H. V. Cane, “A Simple Concept for Modeling Cosmic Ray Modulation in the Inner Heliosphere during Solar Cycles 20–23,” J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1353 SSH 5-1–SSH 5-15 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.N. Obridko, B.D. Shelting, A.F. Kharshiladze, 2006, published in Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiya, 2006, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 310–319.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Obridko, V.N., Shelting, B.D. & Kharshiladze, A.F. Calculation of the interplanetary magnetic field based on its value in the solar photosphere. Geomagn. Aeron. 46, 294–302 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793206030029

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793206030029

PACS numbers

Navigation