Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unconscious context control of visual perception of simple stimuli: A study using evoked potentials

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of nonsemantic context on the perception of simple nonverbal visual stimuli has been studied in ten healthy volunteers by the event-related potential (ERP) method. The nonsemantic context was specified by the formation of a memory trace of a test visual stimulus via its repeated presentation without any instruction except gaze fixation. Then, this stimulus randomly alternated with control stimuli that did not form memory traces before their presentation. It has been found that an ERP in the interval 260–340 ms after presentation of a simple nonverbal stimulus significantly differs from the control ERPs. The results suggest that some stages of the processing of visual stimuli may be modified by nonsemantic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forster, K.I., The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming, J. Psycholinguistic Research, 1998, vol. 27, p. 203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer, R., Schubert, T., and Liepelt, R., Accessory Stimuli Modulate Effects of Nonconscious Priming, Percept. Psychophys., 2007, vol. 69, no. 1, p. 9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tulving, E. and Schacter, D.L., Priming and Human Memory Systems, Science, 1990, vol. 247, p. 301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eddy, M., Schmid, A., and Holcomb, P.J., Masked Repetition Priming and Event-Related Brain Potentials: A New Approach for Tracking the Time-Course of Object Perception, Psychophysiology, 2006, vol. 43, no. 6, p. 564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcel, A.J., Conscious and Unconscious Perception: Experiments on Visual Masking and Word Recognition, Cogn. Psychol., 1983, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 197.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, G. and Nobre, A.C., Modulation of Semantic Processing by Spatial Selective Attention, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, vol. 88, no. 3, p. 210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holcomb, P.J., Reder, L., Misra, M., and Grainger, J., The Effects of Prime Visibility on ERP Measures of Masked Priming, Cogn. Brain Res., 2005, vol. 24, p. 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Squire, L.R., Shimamura, A.P., and Graf, P., Independence of Recognition Memory and Priming Effects: a Nemopsychological Analysis, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn, 1985, vol. 11, p. 37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schacter, D.L., Cooper, L.A., and Delaney, S.M., Implicit Memory for Possible and Impossible Objects: Constraints on the Construction of Structural Descriptions, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn, 1991, vol. 17, p. 3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, X.L., Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., and Litkeb, A., Visual Object Priming Differs from Visual Word Priming: An ERP Study, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1997, vol. 102, no. 3, p. 200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osterberg, G., Topography of the Layer of Rods and Cones in the Human Retina, Acta Ophthalm., 1935, no. Suppl. 6, p. 1.

  12. Curcio, C.A., Sloan, K.R., Packer, O., et al., Distribution of Cones in Human and Monkey Retina: Individual Variability and Radial Asymmetry, Science, 1987, vol. 236, p. 579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pazo-Alvarez, P., Cadaveira, F., and Amenedo, E., MMN in the Visual Modality: a Review, Biol. Psychol., 2003, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 199.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Patel, S.H. and Azzam, P.N., Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected Studies of the Event-Related Potential, Int. J. Med. Sci., 2005, vol. 2, p. 147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kotchoubey, B., Event-Related Potentials, Cognition, and Behavior: a Biological Approach, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2006, vol. 30, no. 1, p. 42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Luck, S., An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, Cambridge: MIT-press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson, J.S. and Olshausen, B.A., Timecourse of Neural Signatures of Object Recognition, J. Vision, 2003, vol. 3, p. 499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mecklinger, A. and Meinshausen, R.M., Recognition Memory for Object Form and Object Location: An Event-Related Potential Study, Mem. Cognit., 1998, vol. 26, p. 1068.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Verleger, R., Jaskowski, P., and Wauschkuhn, B., Suspense and Surprise: on the Relationship Between Expectancies and P3, Psychophysiology, 1994, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Scherg, M. and Picton, T.W., Separation and Identification of Event-Related Potential Components by Brain Electric Source Analysis, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, vol. 42,suppl., p. 24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi, S. and Knight, R.T., Anterior and Posterior Association Cortex Contributions To the Somatosensory P300, J. Neurosci., 1991, vol. 11, p. 2039.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Simmons, R.F., Graham, F.K., Miles, M.A., and Chen, X., On the Relationship of the P3a and the Novelty P3, Biol. Psychol., 2001, vol. 56, p. 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Curran, T. and Dien, J., Differentiating Amodal Amiliarity from Modality-Specific ÏEmory Processes: An ERP Study, Psychophysiology, 2003, vol. 40, no. 6, p. 979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman, D., Cognitive Event-Related Potential Components During Continuous Recognition Memory for Pictures, Psychophysiology, 1990, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Begleiter, H., Porjesz, B., and Wang, W., A Neurophysiologic Correlate of Visual Short-Term Memory in Humans, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, vol. 87, p. 46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Curran, T., The Electrophysiology of Incidental and Intentional Retrieval: ERP Old / New Effects in Lexical Decision and Recognition Memory, Neuropsychologia, 1999, vol. 37, p. 771.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Curran, T., Brain Potentials of Recollection and Familiarity, Mem. Cognit., 2000, vol. 20, p. 923.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Allan, K., Wilding, E.L., and Rugg, M.D., Electrophysiological Evidence for Dissociable Processes Contributing To Recollection, Acta Psychol., 1998, vol. 98, p. 231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rugg, M.D., Mark, R.E., Walla, P., et al., Dissociation of the Neural Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Memory, Nature, 1998, vol. 392, p. 595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition, Rugg, M.D. and Coles, M.G.H, Eds., New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Currana, T. and Clearyb, A.M., Using ERPs To Dissociate Recollection from Familiarity in Picture Recognition, Cogn. Brain Res., 2003, vol. 15, p. 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia

    E. V. Levichkina & A. Ya. Kaplan

  2. Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 101447, Russia

    E. V. Levichkina

Authors
  1. E. V. Levichkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ya. Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Levichkina, A.Ya. Kaplan, 2009, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2009, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 27–32.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levichkina, E.V., Kaplan, A.Y. Unconscious context control of visual perception of simple stimuli: A study using evoked potentials. Hum Physiol 35, 152–156 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709020030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709020030

Keywords

Search

Navigation