Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neurophysiological Characteristics of Alternative Uses Task Performance by Means of ERP and ERS/ERD Data Analysis Depending on the Subject’s Productivity and Originality Levels

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an EEG/ERP study involving 44 subjects (26 m : 18 f, mean age 20 ± 1.8 y.o.) who participated in modified Alternative Uses Task (AUT, “create the most original uses”) and the control task (“name the objects related to different categories”) performance. The subjects were presented with 7–8 objects/category names in AUT and control task, respectively, and were to perform ten attempts (repetitions) with each stimulus. Each trial lasted for 5400 ms. The blocks of ten stimulus repetitions of creative/control tasks were randomized, so that each subject was presented with 70–80 creative and 70–80 control trials. The general group of subjects was divided according to their productivity in verbal AUT and originality in nonverbal Torrance “sketches” subtest. The high-productivity group (on the basis of AUT answers) was characterized by lower negativity of ERP amplitudes in the central and parietal areas for N300–N400 and higher P600 amplitudes in the frontal area during AUT vs the control CATEGORIES task. The low-productivity group was characterized by lower P200 amplitude and more negative N300–N400 amplitudes in frontal areas during AUT vs the control task. We assumed that a greater productivity is associated with activation of the semantic network, whereas the participants with lower productivity have visual attention mechanisms involved, which is probably less effective for task performance. In AUT compared to the control task was demonstrated the EEG desynchronization in the frequency range of 7–9 Hz in the frontal areas at 356–564 ms after the stimulus presentation in the high-productivity group. There were no differences between the conditions observed in the low-productivity group. AUT performance by the group with a high nonverbal originality level (Torrance “sketches”) was characterized by greater desynchronization of EEG at 5–8 Hz after stimulus presentation (before 296 ms) in the frontal and parietal areas in comparison with the low-originality group of subjects. Thus, it was assumed that productivity and originality during divergent thinking task performance (AUT) have different effects on the parameters of ERP and EEG synchronization/desynchronization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Fink, A., Benedek, M., and Grabner, R.H., Creativity meets neuroscience: experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking, Methods, 2007, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietrich, A. and Kanso, R., A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight, Psychol. Bull., 2010, vol. 136, no. 5, p. 822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Runco, M.A. and Jaeger, G.J., The standard definition of creativity, Creat. Res. J., 2012, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shemyakina, N.V., Danko, S.G., Nagornova, Zh.V., et al., Changes in the power and coherence spectra of the EEG rhythmic components during solution of a verbal creative task of overcoming a stereotype, Hum. Physiol., 2007, vol. 33, no. 5, p. 524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Camarda, A., Salvia, É., Vidal, J., et al., Neural basis of functional fixedness during creative idea generation: an EEG study, Neuropsychologia, 2018, vol. 118, part A, p. 4.

  6. Shemyakina, N.V. and Nagornova, Z.V., EEG “signs” of verbal creative task fulfillment with and without overcoming self-induced stereotypes, Behav. Sci., (Basel). 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 17.

  7. Sternberg, R.J., The nature of creativity, Creat. Res. J., 2006, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bechtereva, N.P., The usefulness of psychophysiology in the maintenance of cognitive life, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2009, vol. 73, no. 2, p. 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen, P.R., Guilford, J.P., Merrifield, P.R., and Wilson, R.C., Alternate Uses, Beverly Hills: Sheridan Psychological Service, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guilford, J.P., The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plucker, J.A. and Makel, M.C., Assessment of Creativity: The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbot, B., Hass, R.W., and Reiter-Palmon, R., Creativity assessment in psychological research: (re)setting the standards, Psychol. Aesth., Creat., Arts, 2019, vol. 13, no. 2. p. 233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hao, X., Geng, F., Wang, T., et al., Relations of creativity to the interplay between high-order cognitive functions: behavioral and neural evidence, Neuroscience, 2021, vol. 473, p. 90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bitsch, F., Berger, P., Fink, A., et al., Antagonism between brain regions relevant for cognitive control and emotional memory facilitates the generation of humorous ideas, Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 10685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu, K., Qiao, X., Yun, Q., and Hao, N., Educational diversity and group creativity: evidence from fNIRS hyperscanning, NeuroImage, 2021, vol. 243, p. 118564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abraham, A., Rutter, B., and Hermann, C., Conceptual expansion via novel metaphor processing: an ERP replication and extension study examining individual differences in creativity, Brain Lang., 2021, vol. 221, p. 105007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens, C.E. and Zabelina, D.L., Classifying creativity: applying machine learning techniques to divergent thinking EEG data, NeuroImage, 2020, vol. 219, p. 116990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chrysikou, E.G., Jacial, C., Yaden, D.B., et al., Differences in brain activity patterns during creative idea generation between eminent and non-eminent thinkers, NeuroImage, 2020, vol. 220, p. 117011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Perchtold-Stefan, C.M., Papousek, I., Rominger, C., et al., Humor comprehension and creative cognition: shared and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms as indicated by EEG alpha activity, NeuroImage, 2020, vol. 213, p. 116695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu, K., Teng, J., and Hao, N., Gender of partner affects the interaction pattern during group creative idea generation, Exp. Brain Res., 2020, vol. 238, no. 5, p. 1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rominger, C., Papousek, I., Perchtold, C.M., et al., Creativity is associated with a characteristic U-shaped function of alpha power changes accompanied by an early increase in functional coupling, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 2019, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Petersen, T. and Puthusserypady, S., Assessing tDCS placebo effects on EEG and cognitive tasks, 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2019, p. 4509.

  23. Agnoli, S., Zanon, M., Mastria, S., et al., Predicting response originality through brain activity: an analysis of changes in EEG alpha power during the generation of alternative ideas, NeuroImage, 2020, vol. 207, p. 116385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hertenstein, E., Waibel, E., Frase, L., et al., Modulation of creativity by transcranial direct current stimulation, Brain Stimul., 2019, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, X., Duan, H., Kann, Y., et al., The creative thinking cognitive process influenced by acute stress in humans: an electroencephalography study, Stress, 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kraus, B., Cadle, C., Simon-Dack, S., EEG alpha activity is moderated by the serial order effect during divergent thinking, Biol. Psychol., 2019, vol. 145, p. 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, M., Hao, N., Ku, Y., et al., Neural correlates of serial order effect in verbal divergent thinking, Neuropsychologia, 2017, vol. 99, p. 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heinonen, J., Numminen, J., and Hlushchuk, Y., Default mode and executive networks areas: association with the serial order in divergent thinking, PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 9. e0162234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marmpena, M., Dimitriadis, S.I., Thakor, N., and Bezerianos, A., Phase to amplitude coupling as a potential biomarker for creative ideation: an EEG study, 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016, p. 383.

  30. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., et al., To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas, NeuroImage, 2014, vol. 88, no. 100, p. 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kröger, S., Rutter, B., Hill, H., et al., An ERP study of passive creative conceptual expansion using a modified alternate uses task, Brain Res., 2013, vol. 1527, p. 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., and Neubauer, A.C., Tackling creativity at its roots: evidence for different patterns of EEG alpha activity related to convergent and divergent modes of task processing, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2012, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fink, A., Graif, B., and Aljoscha, C., Brain correlates underlying creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in professional vs. novice dancers, NeuroImage, 2009, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fink, A., Grabner, R.H., Benedek, M., et al., The creative brain: investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2009, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pfurtscheller, G., Quantification of ERD and ERS in the time domain, in Event-Related Desynchronization, Handbook of Electroencephalic and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1999, vol. 6, p. 89.

  36. Guilford, J.P., Creativity, Am. Psychol., 1950, vol. 5, p. 444.

  37. Runco, M.A. and Acar, S., Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential, Creat. Res. J., 2012, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martindale, C. and Hines, D., Creativity and cortical activation during creative, intellectual and EEG feedback tasks, Biol. Psychol., 1975, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Martindale, C., Hines, D., Mitchell, L., et al., EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity, Pers. Individ. Differ., 1984, vol. 5, p. 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mölle, M., Marshall, L., Wolf, B., et al., EEG complexity and performance measures of creative thinking, Psychophysiology, 1999, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Martindale, C. and Armstrong, J., EEG complexity and performance measures of creative thinking, Psychophysiology, 1999, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jausovec, N. and Jausovec, K., EEG activity during the performance of complex mental problems, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2000, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Razumnikova, O.M., Creativity related cortex activity in the remote associates task, Brain Res. Bull., 2007, vol. 73, nos. 1—3, p. 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gruzelier, J., A theory of alpha/theta neurofeedback, creative performance enhancement, long distance functional connectivity and psychological integration, Cogn. Process, 2009, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Karakaş, S., A review of theta oscillation and its functional correlates, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2020, vol. 157, p. 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shemyakina, N.V., Potapov, Y.G., and Nagornova, Zh.V., Dynamics of EEG frequency structure during sketching in ecological conditions and non-verbal creative tasks fulfillment by a professional artist: case study, Hum. Physiol., 2022, vol. 48, no. 5 (in press).

  47. Cruz-Garza, J.G., Sujatha Ravindran, A., Kopteva, A.E., et al., Characterization of the stages of creative writing with mobile EEG using generalized partial directed coherence, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2020, vol. 14, p. 577651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Williams, C.C., Kappen, M., Hassall, C.D., et al., Thinking theta and alpha: mechanisms of intuitive and analytical reasoning, NeuroImage, 2019, vol. 189, p. 574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Eisma, J., Rawls, E., Long, S., et al., Frontal midline theta differentiates separate cognitive control strategies while still generalizing the need for cognitive control, Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 14641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Herweg, N.A., Solomon, E.A., and Kahana, M.J., Theta oscillations in human memory, trends Cogn. Sci., 2020, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 208.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kwiatkowski, J., Vartanian, O., and Martindale, C., Creativity and speed of mental processing, Empirical Stud. Arts., 1999, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bechtereva, N.P., Korotkov, A.D., Pakhomov, S.V., et al., PET study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2004, vol. 53, no. 1, p. 11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Flaherty, A.W., Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive, J. Comp. Neurol., 2005, vol. 493, no. 1, p. 147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Beaty, R.E., Creativity and the default network: a functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest, Neuropsychologia, 2014, vol. 64, p. 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Beaty, R.E., The neuroscience of musical improvisation, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2015, vol. 51, p. 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bitsch, F., Berger, P., Nagels, A., et al., The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in social decision-making, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2018, vol. 39, no. 7, p. 3072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wertz, C.J., Chohan, M.O., Flores, R.A., and Jung, R.E., Neuroanatomy of creative achievement, NeuroImage, 2020, vol. 209, p. 116487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mednick, T. and Mednick, F.M., Creative thinking and level of intelligence, J. Creat. Behav. 1967, vol. 1, p. 428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Voronin, A.N. and Galkina, T.V., Diagnosis of verbal creativity (adaptation of Mednick RAT), in Metody psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki (Methods of Psychological Diagnosis), Moscow: Inst. Psichol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1994, no. 2, p. 40.

  60. Tunik, E.E., Test Torrensa: diagnostika kreativnosti (Torrance Test: Diagnosis of Creativity), St. Petersburg: IMATON, 1998.

  61. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., and Karp, S.A., A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vigario, R.N., Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1997, vol. 103, no. 3, p. 395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jung, T.P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., et al., Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2000, vol. 111, no. 10, p. 1745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Tereshchenko, E.P., Ponomarev, V.A., Kropo-tov, Yu.D., and Müller, A., Comparative efficiencies of different methods for removing blink artifacts in analyzing quantitative electroencephalogram and event-related potentials, Hum. Physiol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 241. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119709020157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tallon-Baudry, C. and Bertrand, O., Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation, Trends Cogn. Sci., 1999, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tunik, E.E., Diagnostika kreativnosti: test E. Torrensa, adaptirovannyi variant (Diagnosis of Creativity: E. Torrance Test, Adapted Version), St. Petersburg: Rech’, 2006.

  67. Silvia, P.J., Beaty, R.E., Nusbaum, E.C., et al., Creative motivation: creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking, Biol. Psychol., 2014, vol. 102, p. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shemyakina, N.V., Nagornova, Zh.V., and Danko, S.G., What do we measure—creativity or task complexity? Psychophysiology, 2009, vol. 46, no. 1, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Danko, S.G., Shemyakina, N.V., Nagornova, Zh.V., and Starchenko, M.G., Comparison of the effects of the subjective complexity and verbal creativity on EEG spectral power parameters, Hum. Physiol., 2009, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. von Helversen, B., Gendolla, G.H.E., Winkielman, P., et al., Exploring the hardship of ease: subjective and objective effort in the ease-of-processing paradigm, Motiv. Emotion, 2008, vol. 32, no. 1, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Yang, C.L., Zhang, H., Duan, H., and Pan, H., Linguistic focus promotes the ease of discourse integration processes in reading comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials, Front. Psychol., 2019, vol. 9, p. 2718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Landi, N. and Perfetti, C.A., An electrophysiological investigation of semantic and phonological processing in skilled and less-skilled comprehenders, Brain Lang., 2007, vol. 102, no. 1, p. 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., and Jacobs, A.M., Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading, Brain Res., 2006, vol. 1084, no. 1, p. 89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Lee, H., Lee, Y., Tae, J., and Kwon, Y., Advantage of the go/no-go task over the yes/no lexical decision task: ERP indexes of parameters in the diffusion model, PLoS One, 2019, vol. 14, no. 7, p. e0218451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Donahoo, S.A., Pfeifer, V., and Lai, V.T., Cursed concepts: new insights on combinatorial processing from ERP correlates of swearing in context, Brain Lang., 2022, vol. 226, p. 105079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bridger, E.K., Bader, R., Kriukova, O., et al. The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400, NeuroImage, 2012, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Stróżak, P., Abedzadeh, D., and Curran, T., Separating the FN400 and N400 potentials across recognition memory experiments, Brain Res., 2016, vol. 1635, p. 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Jończyk, R., Kremer, G.E., Siddique, Z., and van Hell, J.G., Engineering creativity: prior experience modulates electrophysiological responses to novel metaphors, Psychophysiology, 2020, vol. 57, no. 10, p. e13630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Hill, H., et al., Can clouds dance? 2. An ERP investigation of passive conceptual expansion, Brain Cogn., 2012, vol. 80, no. 3, p. 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tang, S., Jia, L., Ren, J., et al., Reactive control in evaluating appropriately or inappropriately novel ideas: evidence from electrophysiological measures, Psychophysiology, 2022, vol. 59, no. 7, p. e14010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Rataj, K., Nazareth, D.S., and van der Velde, F., Use a spoon as a spade? Changes in the upper and lower alpha bands in evaluating alternate object use, Front. Psychol., 2018, no. 9, p. 1941.

  82. Sandkühler, S. and Bhattacharya, J., Deconstructing insight: EEG correlates of insightful problem solving, PLoS One, 2008, vol. 3, no. 1, p. e1459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-28-02073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

    Zh. V. Nagornova, V. A. Galkin, V. A. Vasen’kina, A. V. Grokhotova & N. V. Shemyakina

Authors
  1. Zh. V. Nagornova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. A. Galkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. A. Vasen’kina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. V. Grokhotova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. V. Shemyakina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zh. V. Nagornova or N. V. Shemyakina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All studies were carried out in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent updates and approved by the local bioethical committee of Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg). Each participant provided a voluntary written signed informed consent after explaining the potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the upcoming study.

Additional information

Translated by M. Batrukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagornova, Z.V., Galkin, V.A., Vasen’kina, V.A. et al. Neurophysiological Characteristics of Alternative Uses Task Performance by Means of ERP and ERS/ERD Data Analysis Depending on the Subject’s Productivity and Originality Levels. Hum Physiol 48, 609–632 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S036211972270013X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S036211972270013X

Keywords:

Search

Navigation